• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Evaluating Natural Forest Management Efficiency

  • Received Date: 2011-06-01
  • According to the structure-based forest management theory, the appraisal indices system of natural forest management efficiency was established from spatial utilization, species diversity, constructive species competition and tree composition, which could be used to depict stand status, and its metewand was given. Relative weight was endowed by The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and then the conception of natural forest management efficiency comprehensive appraisal index was put forward for the first time and applied to four different sampling plots of natural forest, three of them from Dongdapo forest region, Jiaohe, Jilin province, and one from Baihua forest area, Xiaolongshan, Gansu province, China. The results are as following: the stand status was obviously improved after being managed and plot A, B got a mark of "medium" while C and D were "perfect". From high to low, the arrangement of forest management efficiency comprehensive appraisal index was C > D > A > B. This appraisal result abided by the phenomenon detected in the practical field. The forest management efficiency comprehensive appraisal index brought up in this paper could be taken as a way of comprehensive quantitative change of stand state which directly reflects the effort of forest management and affords scientific basis of natural forest management effort.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 惠刚盈, Klaus von Gadow, 胡艳波, 等. 结构化森林经营 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2007: 26-34

    [2] 李 媛, 周宝祥. 吉文林业局森林资源动态及经营效果评价 [J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2011, 34(1): 60-63

    [3] 朱洪革, 王志勇. 国有林权制度改革目标及森林资源状况评价 [J]. 林业经济, 2010(6), 18-21

    [4] 郝世文, 朱晓静. 五岔沟林业局森林资源变化状况及经营效果评价 [J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2009, 32 (5): 39-42

    [5] 宁金魁, 陆元昌, 赵浩彦. 北京西山地区油松人工林近自然化改造效果评价 [J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37 (7): 42-44

    [6] 赵克尊, 林代斌, 胡润田. 东北林业大学帽儿山实验林场森林经营效果分析 [J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2002, 30 (4): 109-113

    [7] 施本俊, 黄永辉. 广西兴安县乡(镇)森林经营效果评价 [J]. 中南林业调查规划, 1994, 48 (7): 26-31

    [8] 张 峰. 北京山区风景游憩林健康经营效果评价. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2009:7

    [9] 张 峰, 彭祚登, 安永兴, 等. 北京西山地区黄栌人工林健康经营效果研究 [J]. 林业科技开发, 2010, 24 (3): 46-48

    [10] 彭祚登, 张 峰, 安永兴, 等. 北京西山地区侧柏人工林健康经营效果研究 [J]. 河北林果研究, 2010, 25 (1): 22-25

    [11]

    Costanza R. The value of Ecosystem Service and Nature Capital in the world [J]. Nature, 1997 (5): 387-341
    [12]

    Daily G C. Nature’s services: social dependence on natural ecosystems [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997
    [13]

    Ian B. Placing money values on the unpriced benefits of forest [J]. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 1991, 85 (3): 152-165
    [14]

    Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method resources for the future [M]. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1989
    [15]

    Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem service and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387 (15): 253-260
    [16]

    Farber S C, Costanza R, Wilson M A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41 (3): 375-392
    [17] 李永宁, 张宾兰, 秦淑英, 等. 郁闭度及其测定方法研究与应用 [J]. 世界林业研究, 2008, 21 (1): 40-45

    [18] 胡艳波, 惠刚盈. 优化林分空间结构的森林经营方法探讨 [J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 (1): 1-8

    [19]

    Hui G Y, Gadow K V. Das Winkelmass-Theoretische überlegungen zum optimalen Standardwinkel [J]. Allgemeine forst u. jagdzeitung, 2002, 173 (9): 173-177
    [20]

    Aguirre O, Hui G Y, Gadow K V, et al. An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighborhood-based variable [J]. Forestry ecology and management, 2003, 183: 137-145
    [21] 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2001:49

    [22]

    Gadow K V, Füldner K. Zur Methodik der Bestandesbeschreibung. Vortrag anlaesslich der Jahrestagung der A G Forsteinrichtung in Klieken b. Dessau, 1992
    [23]

    Gadow K V. Zur Bestandesbeschreibung in der Foresteinrichtung [J]. Forst und Holz, 1993, 48 (21): 602-606
    [24] 惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 赵中华. 基于相邻木关系的树种分隔程度空间测度方法 [J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30 (4): 131-134

    [25]

    Füldner K. Strukturbeschreibung von Buchen-Edellaubholz-Mischwldern. Dissertation, Fakultt für Forstwissenschaften und Waldkologie. Gttingen:Georg-August-University Gttingen, 1995, 146S
    [26] 惠刚盈, 胡艳波. 混交林树种空间隔离程度表达方式的研究 [J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14 (1): 23-27

    [27]

    Hegyi, F. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands [M]//Fries J. Growth models for tree and stand simulation Stockholm, Sweden: Royal College of forestry, 1974:74-90
    [28]

    Holmes M J, Reed D D. Competition indices for mixed species northern hardwoods [J]. Forestry Science, 1991, 37 (5): 1338-1349
    [29] 孙培琦, 赵中华, 惠刚盈, 等. 天然林林分经营迫切性评价方法及其应用 [J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22 (3): 343-348

    [30] 赵焕臣, 许树柏, 和金生, 等. 层次分析法——一种简易的新决策方法 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986:1-105

    [31] 惠刚盈, 赵中华, 胡艳波. 结构化森林经营技术指南 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2010:120-121

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(5117) PDF downloads(1964) Cited by()

Proportional views

Evaluating Natural Forest Management Efficiency

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

Abstract: According to the structure-based forest management theory, the appraisal indices system of natural forest management efficiency was established from spatial utilization, species diversity, constructive species competition and tree composition, which could be used to depict stand status, and its metewand was given. Relative weight was endowed by The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and then the conception of natural forest management efficiency comprehensive appraisal index was put forward for the first time and applied to four different sampling plots of natural forest, three of them from Dongdapo forest region, Jiaohe, Jilin province, and one from Baihua forest area, Xiaolongshan, Gansu province, China. The results are as following: the stand status was obviously improved after being managed and plot A, B got a mark of "medium" while C and D were "perfect". From high to low, the arrangement of forest management efficiency comprehensive appraisal index was C > D > A > B. This appraisal result abided by the phenomenon detected in the practical field. The forest management efficiency comprehensive appraisal index brought up in this paper could be taken as a way of comprehensive quantitative change of stand state which directly reflects the effort of forest management and affords scientific basis of natural forest management effort.

Reference (31)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return