Most Viewed
1
1998, 11(1): 58-62.
[Abstract]
[PDF 314KB]2
3
2020, 33(3): 146-155.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.03.019
[FullText HTML]4
2020, 33(3): 172-183.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.03.022
5
2014, 27(2): 219-224.
6
2009, 22(1).
7
2010, 23(3): 411-416.
8
2010, 23(2): 195-201.
9
2021, 34(3): 23-36.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.03.003
10
2018, 31(1): 85-93.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.01.011
11
2012, 25(2): 123-129.
12
2003, 16(3): 366-371.
13
2021, 34(4): 149-155.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.04.018
14
2010, 23(2): 278-282.
15
2014, 27(6): 801-808.
16
2010, 23(3): 393-398.
17
2021, 34(3): 13-22.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.03.002
18
2009, 22(1).
19
2019, 32(3): 1-8.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2019.03.001
20
2018, 31(1): 1-14.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.01.001
- First
- Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next
- Last
- Total:5
- To
- Go
Subvmission Guidelines
Peer Review
Reviewer Online
Office Work
Email alert
RSS