[1] BROOKER R W, MAESTRE F T, CALLAWAY R M, et al. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96(1): 18-34.
[2] 张东梅, 赵文智, 罗维成. 荒漠草原带盐碱地优势植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5):1307-1315. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201805.027
[3] PERALTA G, PERRY G L W, VÁZQUEZ D P, et al. Strength of niche processes for species interactions is lower for generalists and exotic species[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2020, 89(9): 1-28.
[4] 郭佳琦, 陈俊辰, 黄 旬, 等. 喜旱莲子草入侵群落主要物种生态位和种间联结研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8):1607-1616. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.007
[5] MA Y X, WANG Y L, LI G T, et al. HunShanDaKe sand east edge of vegetation ecological niche and interspecific association studies[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 351(1): 012045.
[6] GREIG-SMITH P. Quantitative plant ecology[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1983.
[7] 许金石, 陈 煜, 王国勋, 等. 陕北桥山林区主要木本植物群落种间联结性[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(7):1467-1475. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2014.07.1467
[8] 黄林娟, 于燕妹, 安小菲, 等. 广西大石围天坑群天坑森林主要木本植物种间关联性研究[J]. 广西植物, 2021, 41(5):695-706. doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202008028
[9] 舒 琪, 徐瑞晶, 胡 璇, 等. 海南岛甘什岭青梅群落主要乔木树种生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(9):2689-2697. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202109.040
[10] SETA T, DEMISSEW S, WOLDU Z. Floristic diversity and composition of the Biteyu forest in the Gurage mountain chain (Ethiopia): implications for forest conservation[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2019, 30(1): 319-335. doi: 10.1007/s11676-018-0623-8
[11] 赵 安, 田 青, 周晓雷, 等. 迭山北坡云冷杉林火烧迹地灌木树种种间关联性[J]. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(2):163-170.
[12] LOHBECK M, POORTER L, MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS M, et al. Changing drivers of species dominance during tropical forest succession[J]. Functional Ecology, 2014, 28(4): 1052-1058. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12240
[13] 姚良锦, 姚 兰, 易咏梅, 等. 亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林优势种川陕鹅耳枥和多脉青冈的空间格局[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12):1-11. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20181201
[14] 张 盟, 郑俊鸣, 万佳艺, 等. 福建省东门屿优势木本植物的生态位与种间联结[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2022, 42(1):11-19.
[15] ZHANG L, SU Z Y, CHEN B G. Interspecific relationships in the forest community dominated by Pinus kwangtungensis, an endangered species endemic to China[J]. Frontiers of Forestry in China, 2007, 2(2): 128-135. doi: 10.1007/s11461-007-0021-4
[16] 薛 鸥, 魏天兴. 鹫峰国家森林公园低效人工林林下植物种间关联[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(1):34-42. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2016.01.005
[17] 闫东锋, 张妍妍, 吕康婷, 等. 太行山南麓不同海拔梯度天然林优势树种生态位特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8):1571-1580. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.003
[18] 温鑫鸿, 王其炳, 潘 辉, 等. 天宝岩柳杉群落主要乔木种群的种间联结性[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2022, 42(1):1-10.
[19] MA Y M, LI Q H, PAN S P, et al. Niche and interspecific associations of Pseudoanabaena limnetica-Exploring the influencing factors of its succession stage[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 138: 108806.
[20] 黄永涛, 姚 兰, 艾训儒, 等. 鄂西南两个自然保护区亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林类型及其常绿和落叶物种组成结构分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10):990-1002. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0096
[21] 朱强. 鄂西南七姊妹山常绿落叶阔叶混交林物种多样性格局及维持机制[D]. 恩施: 湖北民族大学, 2020.
[22] 郭秋菊, 陈礼波, 艾训儒, 等. 七姊妹山常绿落叶阔叶混交林中典型群落的结构与多样性分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(1):91-97. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.01.016
[23] 姚良锦, 姚 兰, 易咏梅, 等. 湖北七姊妹山亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林的物种组成和群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(3):275-284. doi: 10.17520/biods.2016180
[24] LEVINS R. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968, 12-25.
[25] SCHOENER T W. Resource partitioning in ecological communities: research on how similar species divide resources helps reveal the natural regulation of species diversity[J]. Science, 1974, 185(4145): 27-39. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4145.27
[26] PIANKA E R. The structure of lizard communities[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 53-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413
[27] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3): 998-1005. doi: 10.2307/1938071
[28] ROUSSET O, LEPART J. Positive and negative interactions at different life stages of a colonizing species (Quercus humilis)[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88(3): 401-412. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00457.x
[29] 张金屯. 数量生态学 (第三版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.
[30] KADMON R, PULLIAM H R. Island biogeography: effect of geographical isolation on species composition[J]. Ecology, 1993, 74(4): 977-981. doi: 10.2307/1940467
[31] BISHARA A J, HITTNER J B. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches[J]. Psychological methods, 2012, 17(3): 399-417. doi: 10.1037/a0028087
[32] 孙杰杰, 江 波, 吴初平, 等. 浙江省檫木林生境与生态位研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3):884-894.
[33] 李一凡, 刘梦芸, 甘先华, 等. 深圳市坝光湿地园银叶树群落优势种生态位特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(11):2171-2178. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.11.004
[34] MILNE G R, MASON C H. An ecological niche theory approach to the measurement of brand competition[J]. Marketing Letters, 1990, 1(3): 267-281. doi: 10.1007/BF00640803
[35] 杨新东, 陈流保, 曾献兴, 等. 广东翁源青云山自然保护区森林群落优势树种的生态位特征[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(6):565-573. doi: 10.11926/jtsb.4214
[36] WALKE B. Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience[J]. Conservation Biology, 1995, 9(4): 747-752. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040747.x
[37] 何友均, 崔国发, 邹大林, 等. 三江源自然保护区玛珂河林区寒温性针叶林优势灌木种间联结研究[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(12):126-129. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2006.12.022
[38] 江常春, 梁希妮, 田 磊, 等. 浙江省常绿阔叶林优势树种种间联结分析[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 45(4):437-445.
[39] 王乃江, 张文辉, 陆元昌, 等. 陕西子午岭森林植物群落种间联结性[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(1):67-78.
[40] JOHNSON D J, BEAULIEU W T, BEVER J D, et al. Conspecific negative density dependence and forest diversity[J]. Science, 2012, 336(6083): 904-907. doi: 10.1126/science.1220269
[41] GU L, O'HARA K L, LI W, et al. Spatial patterns and interspecific associations among trees at different stand development stages in the natural secondary forests on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2019, 9(11): 6410-6421. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5216
[42] JONSSON, B G, MOEN J. Patterns in species associations in plant communities: the importance of scale[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1998, 9(3): 327-332. doi: 10.2307/3237097
[43] 宋育红, 邢建宏, 邓贤兰. 格氏栲自然保护区常绿阔叶林群落优势树种种间联结性分析[J]. 井冈山大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(4):64-70.