松树分子标记辅助育种研究进展

黄少伟

松树分子标记辅助育种研究进展

黄少伟¹

1.
华南农业大学林学院, 广东广州 510642
基金项目:
广东省科技攻关项目(C20303, 2003C201015) ,国家“十五”科技攻关子课题(2002BA515B0103)

Progress on the Research of Marker-aided Breeding of Pinus spp.

HUANG Shao-wei¹

1.
College of Forestry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China

摘要: 松树是世界上森林生态系统和人工林的重要树种,松树的遗传改良开展早,进展快,成效大。分子标记技术为缩短育种周期,提高育种效率提供了有力的工具。本文回顾了世界上松树分子标记遗传图谱构建、比较遗传作图、数量性状位点定位和标记辅助选择的研究进展。已经构建遗传连锁图的林木有13个属,近40个树种,其中松树占40%,而大多数松树遗传图谱仍然是不完整的,不能覆盖全基因组;比较遗传作图显示松属树种具有高度的遗传保守性;数量性状位点(QTL)定位表明,大多数性状的遗传基础存在着主效基因,为开展分子标记辅助选择提供了良好的基础。杂种松部分重要性状的遗传控制中存在着树种效应,对标记辅助选择和育种策略的制订具有指导意义。
- 松树
- / 遗传图谱
- / 比较遗传作图
- / QTL定位
- / 分子标记辅助选择
Abstract: Pinus spp.are the important species in forest ecosystems and plantations in the world.Genetic improvement of pines started early.Great progress has been made and marked success has been achieved.Molecular marker techniques provided powerful tools to shorten the period and raise the efficiency in tree breeding.The worldwide progress on construction of molecular marker linkage map,comparative mapping,quantitative trait locus(QTL) mapping and marker-aided selection(MAS) in Pinus spp.was reviewed.Genetic linkage maps have been constructed for nearly 40 species of forest trees from 13 genera,in which pine species accounted for 40%.Most of the linkage maps in pines are still incomplete,unable to cover the whole genomes.High level of genetic conservative in pine species has been revealed with comparative mapping.Existence of main effect genes revealed by QTL mapping for most of the economically important traits provided a good basis for MAS.For genetic control of part of the important traits in hybrid pines,"species effect"was found.Implication of "species effect"to MAS and the formulation of breeding strategy was also discussed.
- Pinus spp.
- / linkage map
- / comparative mapping
- / QTL mapping
- / marker-aided selection

[1]	Brown G R, Kadel III E E, BassoniD L, et al. Anchored referenceloci in loblolly p ine (Pinus taeda L.) for integrating p ine genomics[J]. Genetics, 2001, 159: 799～809
[2]	潘志刚,游应天. 湿地松、火炬松、加勒比松引种栽培[M]. 北京:北京科学技术出版社, 1991
[3]	Mckeand S E,Bridgwater F E. Third-generation Breeding Strategy forthe North Carilina State University-Industry Cooperative Tree Imp rovement Program [A]. In: Proc IUFRO Con. S2. 02-07 BreedingTrop ical Trees [C]. 1992: 234～240
[4]	Tarbert J T, Weir R J, Arnold R D. Costs and benefits of a matureFirst-generation loblolly p ine tree imp rovement p rogram [J]. J For,1985, 83: 162～166
[5]	Wier R J, Todd D. Third cycle breeding strategy: a descrip tion andeconomic app raisal for the North Carolina State University-IndustryCooperative Tree Imp rovement Program [A]. In: Proc 24 th Can TreeImp rov Ass [C]. Fredricton, New Brunswich, Canada. August 15- 19, 1993: 41～51
[6]	Shelbourne C J A, Burdon R D, Carson S D, et al. Developmentp lan for radiata p ine breeding [M]. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand, 1986
[7]	Hains R J. Mass p ropagation by cuttings, biotechnologies, and thecap ture of genetic gain [A]. In: Proc AFOCEL-IUFRO Symposium“Mass p roduction technology for genetically imp roved fast growingforest tree species”[C]. Bordeaux, France, 14 - 18 Sep t. 1992, 2:137～150
[8]	NiklesD G. The first 50 years of the evolution of forest tree imp rovement in Queensland [A]. In: DietersM J, Matheson A C,NiklesDG, et al. Tree Imp rovement for Sustainable Trop ical Forestry [C].Proceedings of the QFR I-IUFRO Conference, 27 October-1November1996, Caloundra, Queensland, Australia: 51～64
[9]	Nikles D G. Experience with some Pinus hybrids in Queensland,Australia[A]. In: Dungey H S, DietersM J, Nikles D G. Hybridand Genetics of Forest Trees [C]. Proceedings of QFR I/CRC2SPFSymposium, 9 - 14 Ap ril 2000, Noosa, Queensland, Australia: 27～43
[10]	李宪政, 赵奋成, 张应中,等. 湿地松与加勒比松杂种第一代生长研究初报[J]. 广东林业科技, 1999, 15 (1) : 1～7
[11]	张应中, 赵奋成, 钟岁英,等. 湿地松×加勒比松杂种扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15 (4) : 437～443
[12]	黄少伟. 杂种松重要性状QTL定位与标记辅助选择研究[D].广州:华南农业大学, 2004
[13]	甘四明, 苏晓华. 林木基因组学研究进展[J]. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2006, 32 (2) : 133～142
[14]	HarryD E, Temesgen B,NealeD B. Codominant PCR-basedmarkers for Pinus taeda developed from mapped cDNA clones [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1998, 97: 327～336
[15]	Temesgen T, Brown G R, Harry D E, et al. Genetic mapp ing ofexp ressed sequence tag polymorphism (ESTp) markers in loblollyp ine (Pinus taeda L.) [J]. Theor App l Genet, 2001, 102: 664～675
[16]	Lesp inasse D, Rodier-GoudM, GriverL, et al. A saturated geneticlinkage map of rubber tree (Havea spp.) based on RFLP, AFLP,microsatellite, and isozyme markers [J]. Theor App l Genet,2000, 100: 127～138
[17]	Kaya Z, NealD B. Linkage mapp ing in Turkish p ine (Pinus brutiaTen.) using random amp lified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1995, 44: 110～116
[18]	Li C, Yeh F C. Construction of a framework map in Pinus contortaSubsp. Latifolia using random amp lified polymorphic DNA markers[J]. Genome, 2001, 44: 147～153
[19]	Nelson C D, NanceW L, Doudrick R L. Apartial genetic linkagemap of slash p ine (Pinus elliottii Engelmann var. elliottii) based onrandom amp lified polymorphic DNAs [J]. Theor App l Genet,1993, 87: 145～151
[20]	Travis S E, Ritland K, Whiteham T G, et al. A genetic map ofPinyon p ine (Pinus edulis) based on amp lified fragment length polymorphisms [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1998, 97: 871～880
[21]	DeveyM, Carson S, Nolan M, et al. Random amp lified polymorphic DNA markers tightly linked to a gene for resistance to whitep ine blister rust in sugar p ine [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1995, 92: 2066～2070
[22]	尹佟明, 朱立煌, 黄敏仁. 利用RAPD标记和单株树大配字体构建马尾松的分子标记连锁图谱[J]. 植物学报, 1997, 39(7) : 607～612
[23]	Nelson C D, Kubisiak TL, StineM, et al. A Genetic LinkageMapof Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustrisMill.) Based on Random Amp lified Polymorphic DNAs [J]. Journal of Heredity, 1994, 85: 433～439
[24]	Plomion C, Bahuman N, Durel C E, et al. Genomic mapp ing inmaritime p ine (Pinus pinaster) using RAPD markers [J]. Heredity, 1995, 74: 661～668
[25]	Plomion C, O’MalleyDM, Durel C E1 Genomic mapp ing in maritime p ine (Pinus pinaster) Comparison of two RAPD map s usingselfed and open-pollinated seeds of the same individual [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1995, 90: 1028～1034
[26]	DeveyM E, Bell J C, Smith D N, et al. A genetic map for Pinusradiata based on RFLP, RAPD, and microsatellite markers [J].TheorApp l Genet, 1996, 92: 673～679
[27]	DeveyM, SewellM M, Uren T L, et al. Comparative mapp ing inloblolly and radiata p ine using RFLP and microsatellite markers[J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1999, 99: 656～662
[28]	Yin TM, Wang X R, Anderson B, et al. Nearly comp lete geneticmap s of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots p ine) constructed by AFLPmarker analysis in a full-sib family [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 2003,106: 1075～1083
[29]	Komulainen P, Brown G R, MikkonenM, et al. Comparing ESTbased genetic map s between Pinus sylvestris and Pinus taeda [J].TheorApp l Genet, 2003, 107 (4) : 667～678
[30]	Echt C S, Nelson C D. Linkage mapp ing and genome length ineastern white p ine (Pinus strobes L.) [J]. Theor App l Genet,1997, 94 (8) : 3～37
[31]	DeveyM E, Fiddler TA, Liu B H, et al. A RFLP linkagemap forloblolly p ine based on a three2generation outbred pedigree [J].TheorApp l Genet, 1994, 88: 273～278
[32]	GrooverA M, DeveyM E, Lee J, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing wood specific gravity in an outbred pedigree of loblolly p ine [J]. Genetics, 1994, 138: 1293～1300
[33]	Remington D L, Whetten RW, Liu B H, et al. Construction of anAFLP genetic map with nearly comp lete genome coverage in Pinustaeda [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1999, 98: 1279～1292
[34]	SewellMM, Sherman B K,Neale D B. A consensusmap for loblolly p ine (Pinus taeda L.) I. Construction and integration of individual linkage map s from two outbred three2generation pedigree[J]. Genetics, 1999, 151: 321～330
[35]	SewellM M, Bassoni D L, Megraw R A, et al. Identification ofQTLs influencingwood p roperty traits in loblolly p ine (Pinus taedaL.) I. Physical wood p roperties [J]. Theor App l Genet, 2000,101: 1273～1281
[36]	Zhou Y, Gwaze D P, Bui T, et al. No clustering for linkage mapbased on low-copy and undermethylated microsatellites [J]. Genome, 2003, 45: 809～816
[37]	Kondo T, Terada K, Hayashi E, et al. RAPD markers linked to agene for resistance to p ine needle gallmidge in Japanese black p ine(Pinus thunbergii) [J]. Theor App l Genet, 2000, 100: 391～395
[38]	Hayashi E, Kondo T, Terada K, et al. Linkage map of Japaneseblack p ine based on AFLP and RAPD markers including markerslinked to resistance against the p ine needle gall midge [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 2001, 102: 871～875
[39]	Kim Y Y, Choi H S, Kang B Y. An AFLP2based linkage map ofJapanese red p ine (Pinus densiflora) using hap loid DNA samp les ofmegagametophytes from a single maternal tree [J]. Molecules andCells, 2005, 20 (2) : 201～209
[40]	Dale G. Genetic mapp ing in an interspecific hybrid between Pinuscaribaea and Pinus elliottii [D]. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 1994
[41]	ShepherdM, CrossM, DietersM J, et al. Genetic map s for Pinuselliottii var. elliottii and P. caribaea var. hondurensis using AFLPand microsatellite markers [J]. Theor App l Genet, 2003, 106:1409～1419
[42]	Kubisiak TL, Nelson C D, NanceW L. RAPD linkagemapp ing ina longleaf p ine′slash p ine F1 family [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1995,90: 1119～1127
[43]	Bradshaw H D J, Stettler R F. Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus I. Trip loidy in hybrid pop lar [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1993, 86: 301～307
[44]	Bradshaw H D J, VillarM, Watson B D, et al. Molecular geneticsof growth and development in Populus III. A genetic linkagemap ofa hybrid pop lar composed of RFLP, STS, and RAPD markers [J].TheorApp l Genet, 1994, 89: 167
[45]	Kriebel H B. DNA sequence components of the Pinus strobes nuclear genome [J]. Can J For Res, 1985, 15: 1～4
[46]	Wakamiya I, Newton R J, Johnston J S. Genome size and environment factors in the genus Pinus [J]. Am J Bot, 1993, 80: 1235～1241
[47]	Williams C G. Peculiarity of the p ine genome: relevance for biotechnology p rogram [A]. In: Dungey H S, DietersM J, NiklesDG. Hybrid and Genetics of Forest Trees[C]. Proceedings ofQFR I/CRC-SPF Symposium, 9 - 14 Ap ril 2000, Noosa, Queensland,Australia: 168
[48]	王明庥. 林木遗传育种学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001:336～367
[49]	Sax K, Sax H J. Chromosome number and morphology in the conifers [J]. J Arnold Arbor, 1933, 14: 356～375
[50]	Auckland L, Bui T, Zhou Y, et al. ConiferMicrosatellite Handbook [M]. TexasA&M, College Station, Texas, 2002
[51]	DeveyM, Bell J, Moran G. A set ofmicrosatellite markers for fingerp rinting and breeding app lications in Pinus radiata [J]. Genome, 2001, 45: 984～989
[52]	ShepherdM, CrossM, Maguire TL, et al. Transpecificmicrosatellites for hard p ines [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 2002, 104: 819～827
[53]	WilliamsC G. How will genomicmapp ing shape forest tree breedingstrategy? [A] In: DietersM J,Matheson A C, Nikles D G, et al.Tree Imp rovement for Sustainable Trop ical Forestry [C]. Proceedings of the QFR I2IUFRO Conference, 27 October21November 1996,Caloundra, Queensland, Australia: 464～466
[54]	Lagercrantz U. Comparative mapp ing between A rabidopsis thalianaand B rassica nigra indicates that Brassica genome have evolvedthrough extensive genome rep lication accompanied by chromosomefusions and frequent rearrangements [J]. Genetics, 1998, 150:1217～1228
[55]	Prager EM, FowlerD P, Wilson A C. Rates of evolution of conifers [J]. Evolution, 1976, 30: 637～649
[56]	Krutovsky K V, TroggioM, Brown G R, et al. Comparative mapp ing in the Pinaceae [J]. Genetics, 2004, 168: 447～461
[57]	Pederick L. Chromosomal relationship s among Pinus species [J].Silvi Genet, 1972, 21: 171～180
[58]	ConkleM T. Isozyme variation and linkage in six confiner species[A]. In: Proc of the Symposium on Isozymes in North AmericanForest Trees and Forest Insects[C]. USDA For Serv Gen Tech RepPSW248, 1981: 11～17
[59]	AhujaM, DeveyM, GrooverA, et al. Mapped DNA from loblollyp ine can be used for restriction fragment length polymorphisms inother conifers [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1994, 88: 279～282
[60]	Lerceteau E, Plomion C, Andresson B. AFLP mapp ing and detection of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for economically importanttraits in Pinus sylvestris: a p reliminary study [J]. Mol Breed,2001, 6: 451～458
[61]	Yazdani R, Yeh F C, Rimsha J. Genomic mapp ing of Pinus sylvestris (L.) using random amp lified polymorphic DNA markers [J].For Genet, 1995, 2: 109～116
[62]	LuM Z, Szmidt A E, Wang X2R. Inheritance of RAPD fragmentsin hap loid and dip loid tissue of Pinus sylvestris (L.) [J]. Heredity, 1995, 74: 582～589
[63]	Hurme P, Savolainen O. Comparison of homology and linkage ofRAPD markers between individual trees of Scots p ine (Pinus sylvestris L.) [J]. Mol Ecol, 1999, 8: 15～22
[64]	Echt C S, Vendramin G G, Nelson C D, et al. MicrosatellitesDNAas shared genetic markers among conifer species [J]. Can J ForRes, 1999, 29: 365～371
[65]	Cato S A, Gardner R C, Kent J, et al. A rap id PCR-based methodfor geneticallymapp ing ESTs [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 2001, 102:296～306
[66]	Perry D J, Bousquet J. Sequence-tagged-site markers of arbitrarygenes: development, characterization and analysis of linkage inblzck sp ruce [J]. Genetics, 1998, 149: 1089～1098
[67]	PavyN, Laroche J, Bousquet J, et al. Large-scale statistical analysis of secondary xylem ESTs in p ine [J]. PlantMol Bio, 2005,57: 203～224
[68]	Bradshaw H D J, Foster G S. Marker-aided selection and p ropagation systems in tree: advantages of cloning for studying quantitativeinheritance [J]. Can J For Res, 1992, 22: 1044～1049
[69]	Bradshaw H D J, Stettler R F. Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus IV. Mapp ing QTLs with large effects ongrowth, form, and phenology traits in a forest tree [J]. Genetics,1995, 139: 963～973
[70]	Soller M, Meckmann J S. Marker-based mapp ing of quantitativetrait loci using rep licated p rogenies [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1990,80: 205～208
[71]	苏晓华, 李金花, 陈伯望,等. 杨树叶片数量性状相关联标记及其图谱定位研究[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36 (1) : 33～70
[72]	黄秦军, 苏晓华, 黄烈健,等. 美洲黑杨×青杨木材性状QTLs定位研究[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40 (2) : 55～60
[73]	ByrneM, Murrell J C, Owen J V, et al. Identification and mode ofaction of quantitative trait loci affecting seedling height and leaf areain Eucalyptus nitens [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1997, 94: 674～681
[74]	ByrneM, Murrell J C, Owen J V, et al. Mapp ing of quantitativetrait loci influencing frost tolerance in Eucalyptus nitens [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1997, 95: 975～979
[75]	DeveyM E, Carson S, NolanM, et al. QTL association for densityand diameter in Pinus radiata and the potential formatker-aided selection [A]. In: Wilton A. 49 th Annual meeting of the GeneticsSociety of Australia [C]. GSA, University of New South Wale,Sydney, New SouthWales, Australia, 2002: 28
[76]	Grattapaglia D, Bertolucci F L, Sederoff R R. Genetic mapp ing ofQTls controlling vegetative p ropagation in Eucalyptus grandis andE. urophylla using a p seudo-testcross strategy and RAPD markers[J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1995, 90: 933～947
[77]	Grattapaglia D, Bertolucci F L G, Penchel R, et al. Genetic mapp ing of quantitative trait loci controlling growth and wood qualitytraits in Eucalyptus grandis using a maternal half-sib family andRAPD markers [J]. Genetics, 1996, 144: 1205～1214
[78]	Plomion C, Durel C E. Estimation of the average effects of specificalleles detected by the p seudo-testcrossQTL mapp ing strategy [J].Genet Sel Evol, 1996, 28: 223～235
[79]	Plomion C, Durel C E, O’MalleyD M. Genetic dissection of heightin maritime p ine seedlings raised under accelerated growth conditions [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 1996, 93: 849
[80]	Shepherd M, Chaparro J X, Teasdale R. Genetic mapp ing ofmonoterpene composition in an interspecific eucalyp t hybrid [J].TheorApp l Genet, 1999, 99: 1207～1215
[81]	ShepherdM, CrossM, DietersM J, et al. Branch architecture QTLfor Pinus elliottii var. elliottii ×Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis hybrids [J]. Ann For Sci, 2002, 59: 617～625
[82]	Shepherd M, CrossM, Dieters M J, et al. Genetics of physicalwood p roperties and early growth in a trop ical p ine hybrid [J]. CanJ For Res, 2003, 33: 1923～1932
[83]	Thamarus KA, Groom K, Merrell J, et al. A genetic linkage mapdfor Eucalyptus globuleswith candidate loci forwood, fibre, and floral traits [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 2002, 104: 379～387
[84]	DeveyM E, Groom KA, NolanM F, et al. Detection and verification of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Dothistroma needleblight in Pinus radiate [J]. TheorApp l Genet, 2004, 108: 1056～1063
[85]	Wheeler N C, Jermstad K D, Krutovsky K, et al. Mapp ing ofquantitative trait loci controlling adap tive traits in coastalDouglas-firⅣ. Cold-hardiness QTL verification and candidate gene mapp ing[J]. Mol Breed, 2005, 15: 145～156
[86]	Bradshaw H D J. Case history in genetics of long-lived p lants: molecular app roaches to domestication of a fast-growing forest tree:Populus [A]. In: Paterson A H. MolecularDissection of Comp lexTraits [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1998: 219～228
[87]	Bernatzky R, Mulcahy K L. Marker-aided selection in a backcrossbreeding p rogram for resistance to chestnut blight in the Americanchestnut [J]. Can J For Res, 1992, 22: 1332～1337
[88]	Strauss S H, Lande R, Namkoog G. Limitations ofmolecular-aidedselection in forest tree breeding [J]. Can J For Res, 1992, 22:1050～1061
[89]	ShepherdM, Huang S, Eggler P, et al. Congruence in QTL for adventitious rooting in Pinus elliottii ×Pinus caribaea hybrids resolvesbetween and within-species effects [J]. MolBreed, Published Online: 29 June, 2006 (http: / /dx. doi. org/10. 1007 / s11032-0069006-5)

[1]	张蕴哲 , 刘红霞 , 邬荣领 , 李明亮 , 胡建军 , 尹伟伦 , 韩一凡 . 毛新杨×毛白杨AFLP分子遗传图谱. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16(5): 595-603.
[2]	黄秦军 , 苏晓华 , 张香华 . 利用AFLP和SSR标记构建美洲黑杨×青杨遗传图谱. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17(3): 291-299.
[3]	张照远 , 甘四明 , 李发根 , 李梅 , 翁启杰 , 胡哲森 . EST-CAPS标记在尾叶桉和细叶桉遗传图谱构建中的应用. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(2): 230-234.
[4]	杨宝君 , 胡凯基 , 王秋丽 , 孙玉林 , 吴政民 , 汪企明 . 松树对松材线虫抗性的研究*. 林业科学研究, 1993, 6(3): 249-255.
[5]	花晓梅 , 骆贻颛 , 刘国龙 . 松树Pt菌剂育苗菌根化研究*. 林业科学研究, 1995, 8(3): 258-264.
[6]	花晓梅 , 刘国龙 , 张效林 , 余良富 , 曾平生 , 黄冬青 . 松树截根菌根化育苗和造林的研究*. 林业科学研究, 1995, 8(5): 535-543.
[7]	弓明钦 , 王凤珍 , 陈羽 , 陈应龙 . 松茸菌株对6种松树幼苗的感染及其菌根解剖学研究. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(4): 356-361.
[8]	郑来友 , 李文钿 , 成小飞 , 花晓梅 . 彩色豆马勃与松树形成内外生菌根的研究. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16(3): 262-268.
[9]	陈孝英 , 何礼华 . 松树繁殖新途径—针叶束嫁接技术. 林业科学研究, 1989, 2(2): 109-112.
[10]	沈伯葵 , 葛明宏 , 张明海 , 薛梦澜 , 姚长林 . 松梢枯病及其病原的研究(一). 林业科学研究, 1992, 5(6): 659-664.
[11]	叶建仁 , 解春霞 , 王永银 , 程淑婉 . 松针褐斑病菌致病机制的研究. 林业科学研究, 1998, 11(3): 243-248.
[12]	杨宝君 , 汪来发 , 赵文霞 , 徐福元 , 张培 , 李占鹏 . 松材线虫病的潜伏侵染及松墨天牛传播新途径. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(3): 251-255.
[13]	吕本树 , 姜景民 , 孙海菁 . 火炬松树干通直度遗传变异及选择效果初探. 林业科学研究, 1997, 10(6): 668-672.
[14]	于晓丽 , 李发根 , 翁启杰 , 周长品 , 甘四明 . 桉树扦插生根和生长性状的QTL定位. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(2): 200-204.
[15]	黄海燕 , 杜红岩 , 乌云塔娜 , 朱高浦 . 基于SSR分子标记的杜仲遗传多样性体系建立. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(6): 795-799.
[16]	郭丽琴 , 李友丽 , 饶国栋 , 张建国 . 利用SRAP分子标记分析杨属遗传变异和亲缘关系. 林业科学研究, 2019, 32(3): 88-96. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2019.03.012
[17]	王曦茁 , 汪来发 , 曹业凡 , 胡坚 , 汪祥 , 覃艳 , 王永春 . 以beta-tubulin基因为选择标记的淡紫紫孢菌遗传转化. 林业科学研究, 2023, 36(4): 12-19. doi: 10.12403/j.1001-1498.20230056
[18]	王海林 , 杨文云 , 高成杰 , 李昆 , 熊晖 , 杨发成 . 不同产脂量云南松树脂道解剖学比较研究. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(3): 352-357.
[19]	李斌 , 顾万春 , 夏良放 , 李锡泉 , 干少雄 . 鹅掌楸种源遗传变异和选择评价. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(3): 237-243.
[20]	顾万春 , 王全元 , 张英脱 , 周之和 , 刘德安 . 刺槐次生种源遗传差异及其选择评价. 林业科学研究, 1990, 3(1): 70-75.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3725
HTML全文浏览量: 188
PDF下载量: 2030
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

松树分子标记辅助育种研究进展

Progress on the Research of Marker-aided Breeding of Pinus spp.

计量

松树分子标记辅助育种研究进展

English Abstract

Progress on the Research of Marker-aided Breeding of Pinus spp.

全文HTML

目录

留言板

松树分子标记辅助育种研究进展

Progress on the Research of Marker-aided Breeding of Pinus spp.

计量

出版历程

松树分子标记辅助育种研究进展

English Abstract

Progress on the Research of Marker-aided Breeding of Pinus spp.

全文HTML

目录