|
[R]. Leipzig, Germen, 1996: 1～52 |
|
[2]
|
Buddenhagen IW, Kelman A. Biological and physiological aspects ofbacterial wilt caused by Pseudom onas solanacearum [J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1964, 2: 203～230 |
|
[3]
|
Stéphane G, Christian B. Ralstonia solanacearum: secrets of a majorpathogen unveiled by analysis of its genome[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2002, 3 ( 3 ) : 111～118 |
|
[4]
|
Cook D,Barlow E, Sequeira L. Genetic diversity of Pseudom onas solanacearum: detection of restriction fragment length polymorphismswith DNA p robes that specify virulence and the hypersensitive response[J]. Mol Plant2Microbe Interact, 1989, 2: 113～121 |
|
[5]
|
Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, et al. Proposal of burkholderiagen. nov. andtransfer of seven species of the genus Pseudom onas homology groupⅡto the new genus. with the type species B urkholderia cepacia ( Palleroni and Holmes1981) comb. nov. [J]. Journal ofMicrobiology andImmunology, 1992, 36: 1 251～1 275 |
|
[6]
|
Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y. Validation of the published names and newcombinations p reviously effectively published outside the IJSB [J].International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1996, 46: 625～626 |
|
[7]
|
吴清平,梁子超. 桉树青枯病病原鉴定和致病力测定[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1988, 9 (3) : 59～67
|
|
[8]
|
林雪坚,吴光金,石明旺,等. 桉树青枯病病原菌的研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 1993, 20 (2) : 6～10
|
|
[9]
|
Dianese J C,DristigM C G, Cruz A P, et al. Suscep tibility to wiltassociated with Pseudom om as solanacearum among six species of Eucalyptus growing in equatorial Brazil[J]. Australian Plant Pathology,1990, 19: 71～76 |
|
[10]
|
Coutinho T A, Roux J, Riedel K H, et al. First reportot bacterialwilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum on eucalyp ts in South Africa[J]. Journal of Forest Pathology, 2000, 30 (4) : 205～210 |
|
[11]
|
Roux J, WingfieldM J, Coutinho TA. et al. Diseases of PlantationEucalyptus in the Republic of Congo [J]. South African Journal ofScience, 2000, 96 (8) : 454～456 |
|
[12]
|
吴光金,林雪坚,李冬,等. 桉树青枯病流行区病菌小种和生物型的鉴定[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2004, 24 (1) : 27～29
|
|
[13]
|
BonasU. Hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria [J]. Current Topics inMicrobiology and Immunology, 1994, 192: 79～98 |
|
[14]
|
Coburn J. Pseudom onas aeruginosa exoenzyme S[J]. Current Topics inMicrobiology and Immunology, 1992, 175: 133～143 |
|
[15]
|
He S Y, Huang H C, A Collmer. Pseudom onas syringae pv. syringae harp inp ss: a p rotein that is secreted via the hrp pathway and elicits the hypersensitive response in p lants [J]. Cell, 1993, 73:1 255～1 266 |
|
[16]
|
Wei ZM, R J Laby, Zumoff C H et al. Harp in, elicitor of the hypersensitive response p roduced by the p lant pathogen Erw inia am ylovora [J]. Science, 1992, 257: 85～88 |
|
[17]
|
Flor H H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concep t [J]. AnnualReview of Phytopathology, 1971, 9: 275～296 |
|
[18]
|
Akiew E. Trevorrow P R. Management of bacterial wilt of tobacco[A]. In: Hayward A C, Hartman G L. BacterialWilt the Diseaseand Its Causative Agent. Pseudom onas solanacearum [M]. CAB Interational. Wallingford, 1994: 179～198 |
|
[19]
|
Hodges C S, Geary T F, Cordell C E. The occurrence of D iaporthecubensis on Eucalyptus in Florida, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico [J].Plant Disease Reporter, 1979, 63: 216～220 |
|
[20]
|
Lee S S. Pathology of trop ical hardwood p lantations in South-eastAsia[J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 2003, 33 ( 3 ) :321～335 |
|
[21]
|
Roux J, Coutinho T A, Mujuni Byabashaija D, et al. Diseases ofp lantation Eucalyptus in Uganda [J]. South African Journal of Science, 2001, 97 (1、2) : 16～18 |
|
[22]
|
曹季丹. 巴西柳桉、巨桉青枯病调查初报[J]. 广西林业科技,1982 (4) : 30～31
|
|
[23]
|
李伟东. 桉树青枯病在海南发病现状及防治措施[J]. 海南林业科技, 1992 (3) : 21～22
|
|
[24]
|
Wu Q P, Liang Z C. Identification and pathogenic tests of the causal organism of the bacterialwilt of Eucalyptus [J]. Journal of ChinaAgricultural University, 1988a, 9: 59～67 |
|
[25]
|
弓明钦,陈羽,王凤珍,等. 外生菌根对桉树青枯病的防治效应[J]. 林业科学研究, 1999, 12 (4) : 339～345
|
|
[26]
|
Grégoire N, JeanMM, Jean B. Congo: rapport de pays pour la conference technique internationale de la FAO sur les ressources phytogenetiques |
|
[27]
|
张民兴,吴光金,林雪坚,等. 桉树青枯病发病规律的研究[J].中南林学院学报, 1996, 16 (2) : 28～32
|
|
[28]
|
Berga Lemaga, Siriri1 D, Ebanyat P. Effect of soil amendments onbacterialwilt incidence and yield of potatoes in southwestern Uganda[J]. African Crop Science Journal, 2001, 9 (1) : 267～278 |
|
[29]
|
Giller K E, Cadish G, Ehaliotis C, et al. Building soil nitrogencap ital in Africa[A]. In: Buresh R J, Sanchez P A, Calhoun F.Rep lenishing Soil Fertility in Africa[M], Soil Science Society ofAmerica Special Publication No. 51 MadisonWisconsin, USA, 1997:151～192 |
|
[30]
|
施仲美,奚富生,何贵整,等. 桉树品系对青枯病抗性及其稳定性的研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2000 (3) : 1～6
|
|
[31]
|
沈文生, 黄乃秀. 桉树抗青枯病的筛选技术[J]. 广西植保,2000, 13 (4) : 34～36
|
|
[32]
|
吴光金,林雪坚,石明旺,等,桉树抗青枯病树种和无性系的鉴定[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003, 23 (4) : 32～34
|
|
[33]
|
何学友. 我国林木青枯病研究概况[J]. 森林病虫通讯, 1997(1) : 43～46
|
|
[34]
|
Ran L X. Supp ression of BacterialWilt in Eucalyptus and BacterialSpeck in A rabidopsis by Fluorescent Pseudom onas spp. Strains: Conditions and Mechanisms [M]. Utrecht University, Utrecht. TheNetherlands ISBN: 90-393-3118-9, 2002: 1～142 |
|
[35]
|
董春,范怀忠. 植物青枯病菌细菌素的产生、性质及其利用[J].微生物通报, 2000, 27 (4) : 302～304
|
|
[36]
|
弓明钦,陈羽,王凤珍. AM菌根化的两种桉树苗对青枯病的抗性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17 (4) : 441～446
|
|
[37]
|
Molina R,Massicotte H, Trappe JM. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community ecological consequences and p ractical imp lications [A]. In: Allen M F. Mycorrhizal Functioning andIntegrative Plant Fungal Process [C]. NewYork: Chapman andHall, 1992: 357～423 |
|
[38]
|
冉隆贤,谷文众,吴光金. 水杨酸诱导桉树抗青枯病的作用及相关酶活性变化[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17 (1) : 12～18
|
|
[39]
|
康耀卫,毛国璋,吕常胜. 利用转座子Tn5诱变植物青枯菌获得胞外蛋白分泌缺失突变株[J]. 植物保护学报, 1995, 22 ( 3 ) :287～288
|
|
[40]
|
张景宁,张清杰,黄自然,等. 柞蚕杀菌肽对桉树青枯病假单胞杆菌的杀菌作用[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1995, 16 (1) : 97～102
|
|
[41]
|
邵志芳,陈伟元,罗焕亮,等. 柞蚕抗菌肽D基因转入桉树培育抗青枯病株系的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38 (2) : 92～98
|
点击查看大图
下载:
