蛀干昆虫的寄主选择及其在森林健康评价中的应用

王健敏; 刘 娟; 陈晓鸣; 杨子祥; 叶寿德

蛀干昆虫的寄主选择及其在森林健康评价中的应用

1.
中国林业科学研究院资源昆虫研究所,国家林业局资源昆虫培育与利用重点实验室,云南昆明 650224
基金项目:
云南省应用基础研究重点项目"利用蛀干昆虫诊断森林健康研究"(2006C0015Z),国家林业局948项目(2009-4-37),国家林业局林业公益性行业专项(200804001).

Host Selection of Xylophagous Insects and Its Application in Forest Health Evaluation

1.
Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang 311400, Zheijiang, China

摘要: 森林健康关系到其生态系统的稳定性。各国森林健康问题的侧重点不同,森林健康评价标准和诊断方法不统一,特别是亚健康森林的早期诊断仍然是亟待解决的科学难题。本文综述了蛀干昆虫对寄主植物选择机制和规律的国内外研究进展及其在森林健康评价中的应用前景,根据蛀干昆虫中次期性种类总是与亚健康和衰弱林木相伴的规律,提出了利用蛀干昆虫早期诊断和评价森林健康的思路,以蛀干昆虫种群数量与林木健康状况的相互关系为主,辅以物种间相互作用关系(群落结构、生物多样性)、环境因子(气候变化、土壤性质)等建立数学模型,定量分析和综合评价森林健康及其发展趋势。
- 蛀干昆虫
- / 寄主选择
- / 指示昆虫
- / 森林健康诊断
Abstract: Forest is an important component part of ecosystem and therefore forest health is crucial to the stability of ecosystem. However, different countries has different emphases on forest health, furthermore, evaluation criteria and diagnostic methods of forest health are inconsistency, especially diagnosing sub-healthy forest betimes is still a scientific problem need to be solved urgently. The paper reviewed the host selection mechanisms and rules of xylophagous insects and their application foreground in forest health evaluation. According to the rule that some secondary xylophagous insects always accompany with trees which are sub-healthy or unhealthy, ideas of diagnosing and evaluating forest health betimes using xylophagous insects were posed. Mathematical models would be established based mainly on interactions between quantity of xylophagous insect populations and status of forest health, interspecific interactions(community structure, biodiversity) and environmental factors(climatic change, soil property) were also added as supplementary parameters, in order to quantitatively analyzing and comprehensively evaluating forest health and its developing trend.
- xylophagous insect
- / host selection
- / indicative insect
- / forest health diagnosis

[1]	范志平.森林健康刍议[J].现代农业科技,2007(22):219-222
[2]	王彦辉,肖文发,张星耀.森林健康监测与评价的国内外现状和发展趋势[J].林业科学,2007,43(7):78-85
[3]	朱中华.森林健康理论与实践[J].安徽林业,2008(2):25
[4]	曹国江.关于森林健康问题的探讨[J].世界林业研究,2008,21(2):76-80
[5]	周立江.森林健康内涵及评价指标探讨[J].四川林业科技,2008,29(1):27-30
[6]	萧刚柔.中国森林昆虫[M].第2版,北京:中国林业出版社,1992
[7]	张执中.森林昆虫学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997:321-322
[8]	Linsley E G. Ecology of Cerambycidae[J]. Annu Rev Entomol,1959,4:99-138
[9]	Wood D L. The role of pheromones,kairomones,and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles[J]. Annu Rev Entomol,1982,27:411-446
[10]	Solomon J D. Guide to insect borers of North American broadleaf trees and shrubs. Agric. Handbook No 706[M]. USA, WA-Washington, DC:US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service,1995
[11]	Hanks L M. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles[J]. Annu Rev Entomol,1999, 44:483-505
[12]	Allison J D, Borden J H, Seybold S J. A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) [J]. Chemoecology,2004,14:123-150
[13]	Byers J A. Attraction of bark beetles, Tomicus piniperda, Hylurgops palliatus, and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes [J]. J Chem Ecol, 1992, 18(12):2385-2402
[14]	Tomlin E S, Antonejevic E, Alfaro R I, et al. Changes in volatile terpene and diterpene resin acid composition of resistant and susceptible white spruce leaders exposed to stimulated white pine weevil damage [J]. Tree Physiology, 2000, 20(16):1087-1095
[15]	Schroeder L M, Lindelow A. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol [J].J Chem Ecol,1989,15:807-810
[16]	Gladwin J, Kelsey R G, Peck R W. Response of some scolytids and their predators to ethanol and 4-allylanisole in pine forests of central Oregon [J]. J Chem Ecol,2001,27(4):697-715
[17]	赵涛,李丽莎,周楠.云南松对松小蠹的引诱能力及其挥发物组成[J].东北林业大学学报, 2002,30(4):47-49
[18]	Byers J A. Behavioral mechanisms involved in reducing competition in bark beetles [J]. Holarct Ecol, 1989,12(4):466-476
[19]	Moeck H A, Wood D L, Lindahl K Q Jr. Host selection behavior of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa, with special emphasis on the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis [J].J Chem Ecol, 1981,7(1):49-83
[20]	Gregoire J C, Baisier M, Drumont A, et al. Volatile compounds in the larval frass of Dendroctonus valens and Dendroctonus micans (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) in relation to oviposition by the predator, Rhizophagus grandis(Coleoptera:Rhizophagidae) [J]. J Chem Ecol, 1991,17(10):2003-2019
[21]	Moeck H A. Field test for the primary attraction of the spruce beetle [J]. Envir Can For Sew Bi-mon Res Notes,1978,34:8
[22]	Vite J P, Gara R I. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) [J]. Contr Boyce Thompson Inst,1962,21:251-273
[23]	Borden J H,Bennett R B.A continuously recording flight mile for investigating the effects of volatile substance on the flight of tethered insects [J].Ecol Entomol,1969,62(4):782-785
[24]	Salom S M,Hobson K R.Application of Semiochemicals for Management of Bark Beetle Infestation:Proceeding of an Informal Conference[M].Collingdale:Diane Publishing Company,1998:1-22
[25]	Siegert N W. Host preference and potential impact of pine shoot beetle in Michigan pine stands. Dissertation of masters degree[M]. Department of Forestry, America: Michigan State University, 2000
[26]	Byers J A, Lanne B S, Schlyter F, et al. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles [J]. Naturwissenschaften,1985,72:324-326
[27]	Phillips T W. Reponses of Hylastes salebrosus to turpentine, ethanol, and pheromones of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) [J].Florida Entomologist,1990,73(2):286-292
[28]	Francke W, Bartels J, Meyer H, et al. Semiochemicals from bark beetles: new results, remarks, and reflections [J].J Chem Ecol,1995,21(7):1043-1063
[29]	Byers J A. Novel diffusion-dilution method for release of semiochemcals: Testing pheromone component ratios on western pine beetle [J]. J Chem Ecol, 1988, 14(1):199-212
[30]	Borden J H. Aggregation Pheromones [M]//Kerkut G A. In Behavior. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1985:257-285
[31]	Erbilgin N,Kenneth F,Raffa K F.Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetles to their aggregation pheromones[J].J Chem Ecol,2000,26(11):2527-2548
[32]	周楠,毋亚梅,张立新,等.松小蠹成虫对其信息化合物的触角电位反应[J].云南林业科技,2000,9(3):38-42
[33]	祝传书,赵惠燕.虫害诱导的植物挥发物[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2003,31(1):183-186
[34]	段焰青,叶辉,李青青. 小蠹虫与针叶树木的协同进化关系[M]// 段昌群. 生态科学进展:第三卷. 北京:高等教育出版社,2007,83-95
[35]	叶辉.纵坑切梢小蠹对云南松蛀害研究[J].昆虫学报,1999,42(4):394-400
[36]	Byers J A. Effect of mating on terminating aggregation during host colonization in the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus [J]. J Chem Ecol, 1981,7(6):1135-1147
[37]	Byers J A, Zhang Q H, Birgersson G. Strategies of a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in an olfactory landscape [J]. Naturwissenschaften,2000,87:503-507
[38]	陈辉,李宗波.植物挥发性化合物在小蠹虫寄主选择中的作用[J].福建林学院学报,2006,26(1):87-91
[39]	Schroeder L M.Olfactory recognition of nonhost aspen and birch by conifer bark beetles Tomicus piniperda and Hylurgops palliates [J].J Chem Ecol,1992,18:1583-1593
[40]	杨群芳,周祖基,李庆.植物精油对云南松纵坑切梢小蠹的驱避活性研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2003,25(4):357-359
[41]	Groot P D E.Green leaf volatiles inhibit response of red pine cone beetle Conophthorus resinosae(Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to a sex pheromone [J].Naturwissenschaften,1999,86(2):81-85
[42]	孙晓玲.云杉八齿小蠹化学信息物质的研究 . 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2006
[43]	Campbell S A, Borden J H. Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and non-hosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) [J].Ecol Entomol, 2006,31:437-449
[44]	Kolb T E, Guerard N, Hofstetter R W, et al. Attack preference of Ips pini on Pinus ponderosa in northern Arizona: tree size and bole position [J].Agri For Entomol,2006,8:295-303
[45]	Ye H, Li L S. Preliminary observations on the trunk attacks by Tomicus piniperda (L.) (Col., Scolytidae) on Yunnan pine in Kunming, China [J].J Appl Entomol,1995,119:331-333
[46]	Lawrence J F. Coleoptera[M]//Parker S P. Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. USA,NY-New York: McGraw Hill,1982
[47]	Gardiner L M. Deterioration of fire-killed pine in Ontario and the causal wood-boring beetles [J]. Can Entomol, 1957, 89: 241-263
[48]	Melander A L. Destructive beetles: A note on landscape gardening[J]. Entomol News,1904,15:19-20
[49]	Gardiner L M. Insect attack and value loss in wind-damaged spruce and jack pine stands in northern Ontario [J]. Can J For Res, 1975, 5:387-398
[50]	Belyea R M. Death and deterioration of balsam fir weakened by spruce budworm defoliation in Ontario. Part I. Notes on the seasonal history and habits of insects breeding in severely weakened and dead trees [J]. Can Entomol, 1952, 84:325-335
[51]	Linit M J. Nematode-vector relationships in the pine wilt disease system [J]. J Nematol, 1988, 20:227-235
[52]	樊建庭.松墨天牛交配定位过程中的化学信息物质研究 .北京:中国科学院动物研究所,2006
[53]	Morewood W D, Hein K E, Katinic P J, et al. An improved trap for large wood-boring insects, with special reference to Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) [J]. Can J For Res, 2002, 32:519-525
[54]	Meurer-Grimes B, Tavakilian G. Chemistry of cerambycid host plants. Part I: Survey of Leguminosae-A study in adaptive radiation [J]. Botanical Review, 1997, 63:356-394
[55]	江望锦. 松墨天牛成虫与寄主间化学信息联系机制的初步研究 .南京:南京林业大学,2005
[56]	Trapp S, Croteau R. Defensive resin biosynthesis in conifers [J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 2001, 52:689-724
[57]	Kelsey R G, Joseph G. Ethanol in ponderosa pine as an indicator of physiological injury from fire and its relationship to secondary beetles [J]. Can J For Res, 2003, 33:870-884
[58]	Yamasaki T, Hata K, Okamoto H. Luring of Japanese pine sawyer Monochamus alternatus Hope by paraquat-treated pine tree (Ⅰ) the effect of paraquat and ethephon on pine trees [J]. 日林志,1980,62(3):99-102
[59]	Yamasaki T, Suzuki N. Luring of Japanese pine sawyer Monochamus alternatus Hope by paraquat-treated pine tree (Ⅱ) The attractiveness of volatile oil from lightwood [J]. J Jap For Soc,1982,64(9):340-349
[60]	Fettkother R, Reddy G V P, Noldt U. Effect of host and larval frass volatiles on behavioral response of the old house borer, Hylotrupes bajulus (L.)( Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in a wind tunnel bioassay [J]. Chemoecology, 2000, 10: 1-10
[61]	Higgs M D, Evans D A. Chemical mediators in the oviposition behavior of the house longhorn beetle Hylotrupes bajulus [J]. Experientia,1978, 34:46-47
[62]	Kobayashi F, Yamane A, Ikeda T. The Japanese pine sawyer beetle as the vector of pine wilt disease [J]. Annu Rev Entomol,1984,29: 115-135
[63]	Ikeda T, Yamane A, Enda N, et al. Attractiveness of volatile components of felled pine trees for Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) [J].J Jap For Soc, 1986, 68:15-19
[64]	Phillips T W,Wilkening A J,Atkinson T H,et al. Synergism of turpentine and ethanol as attractants for certain pine-infesting beetles (Coleoptera) [J]. Environ Entomol,1988,17(3):456-462
[65]	Suckling D M, Gibb A R, Daly J M, et al. Behavioral and Electrophysiological Responses of Arhopalus tristis to Burnt Pine and other Stimuli [J]. J Chem Ecol,2001, 27(6):1091-1104
[66]	Travakilian G, Berkov A, Meurer-Grimes B, et al. Neotropical tree species and their faunas of Xylophagous longicorns (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in French Guiana [J]. Bot Rev (Lancaster), 1997,63:303-355
[67]	Yamasaki T, Sato M, Sakoguchi H. (-)-Germacrene D: Masking substance of attractants for the cerambycid beetle,Monochamus alternatus (Hope) [J]. Appl Entomol Zool, 1997, 32(3):423-429
[68]	Sumimoto M, Shiraga M, Kondo T. Ethane in pine needles preventing the feeding of the beetle, Monochamus alternatus [J]. J Insect Physiol, 1975, 21:713-722
[69]	杨宝君,潘宏阳,汤坚,等. 松材线虫病[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2003:61-62
[70]	Islam S Q, Ichiryu J, Sato M, et al. D-Catechin: An oviposition stimulant for the cerambycid beetle, Monochamus alternatus from Pinus densiflora [J]. J Pest Sci, 1997, 22: 338-341
[71]	Allison J D,Borden J H,McIntosh R L,et al. Kairomonal response by four Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to bark beetle pheromones [J]. J Chem Ecol,2001, 27(4):633-646
[72]	Lacey E S, Ginzel M D, Millar J G, et al. Male-produced aggregation pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Neoclytus acuminatus [J]. J Chem Ecol,2004,30(8):1493-1507
[73]	Morewood W D, Simmonds K E, Gries R, et al. Disruption by conophthorin of the kairomonal response of sawyer beetles to bark beetle pheromones [J]. J Chem Ecol, 2003, 29(9):2115-2129
[74]	Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, et al. Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) found in the bark of non-host angiosperms [J]. J Chem Ecol,1999,25(4):805-816
[75]	Anbutsu H, Togashi K. Oviposition behavior and response to the oviposition scars occupied by eggs in Monochamus saltuarius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) [J]. Appl Entomol Zool,1997,32:541-549
[76]	李水清. 松墨天牛驱避化合物质的研究 .北京:中国科学院动物研究所,2006
[77]	Anonymous. Alien Forest Pests. Context for the Canadian Forest Services Science Program[M]. CAN, ON-Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service,1999
[78]	Martinez G S. Interactions between bark beetles(Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and habitat structure in pine forests . Dissertation of Doctor’s Degree in Forest Science. America: Northern Arizona University, 2000
[79]	Castillo J V. Ground beetle community structure as a bioindicator of forest health . Dissertation of Doctor’s Degree in Forest Science. America: Northern Arizona University, 2000
[80]	梁军生,陈晓鸣,王健敏,等.受小蠹虫不同阶段为害的云南松光合生理反应分析[J].林业科学研究,2009,22(3):407-412

[1]	王健敏 , 陈晓鸣 , 冯颖 , 段兆尧 . 两种蛀干昆虫消化酶组成和活性比较. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(2): 171-175.
[2]	范立鹏 , 王军辉 , 于占晶 , 黄范全 , 孔祥波 , 王鸿斌 , 张苏芳 , 张真 . 杨小舟蛾成虫对5种黑杨无性系的寄主选择行为. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(4): 459-465.
[3]	崔丽贤 , 张真 , 黄大庄 . 非寄主挥发物对针叶树小蠹虫作用的研究进展. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(6): 895-904.
[4]	邵鹏鹏 , 杨兵军 , 苏智 , 孙佐翔 , 王卓 , 刘宇婷 , 魏建荣 . 光肩星天牛对沙枣和新疆杨的偏好性. 林业科学研究, 2023, 36(4): 122-128. doi: 10.12403/j.1001-1498.20220595
[5]	杜婷 , 廖怀建 , 石雷 . 蜻蜓目水生昆虫在滇池入湖口湿地水质评价中的指示作用. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(5): 145-152. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.05.020
[6]	曲良建 , 张永安 , 王玉珠 , 郎杏茹 . HaNPV病毒对寄主昆虫的持续作用研究. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(2): 216-220.
[7]	吴坚 . 森林害虫重要天敌——中国蚁属昆虫的研究. 林业科学研究, 1990, 3(1): 1-8.
[8]	刘元福 . 海南岛尖峰岭的热带森林昆虫. 林业科学研究, 1996, 9(3): 239-245.
[9]	马涛 , 冯颖 , 吴兴平 , 张翼鸿 , 马艳 , 王自力 . 蛹虫草的一种寄主昆虫初步调查和主要成分分析. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(1): 63-67.
[10]	陈嘉文 , 刘伟 , 何美长 . 我国森林昆虫资源的开发与利用简述. 林业科学研究, 1996, 9(6): 633-639.
[11]	冯颖 , 陈晓鸣 . 食用昆虫营养价值评述. 林业科学研究, 1999, 12(6): 662-668.
[12]	宋德伟 , 马艳 , 冯颖 , 陈晓鸣 . 昆虫细胞工程研究进展. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17(1): 116-124.
[13]	冯颖 , 陈晓鸣 . 食用昆虫的资源价值与可利用方式. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(1): 105-110.
[14]	彭艳琼 , 杨大荣 , 苏绍菊 . 木瓜榕和对叶榕上昆虫群落结构. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(2): 136-142.
[15]	李建庆 , 张永安 , 张星耀 , 杨忠歧 , 袁锋 . 昆虫病原真菌毒素的研究进展. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16(2): 233-239.
[16]	周国法 . 昆虫种群复合空间分布型的研究. 林业科学研究, 1997, 10(1): 24-28.
[17]	朱映 , 黄志嘉 , 蓝来娇 , 张锦坤 , 高庆远 , 王琳 , 李拥虎 , 温秀军 , 马涛 . 天牛科昆虫信息化合物研究现状. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(2): 168-180. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.02.021
[18]	邢嘉琪 . 危害橡胶木的真菌和昆虫. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(2): 230-235.
[19]	汪有奎 , 杨全生 , 倪自银 , 蒋志成 , 刘勋才 , 王零 . 青海云杉林昆虫群落垂直结构研究. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(4): 431-435.
[20]	丁伟峰 , 冯颖 , 马艳 , 张欣 , 马涛 . 昆虫细胞库管理系统的设计与实现. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(3): 325-330.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3538
HTML全文浏览量: 219
PDF下载量: 1856
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

蛀干昆虫的寄主选择及其在森林健康评价中的应用

Host Selection of Xylophagous Insects and Its Application in Forest Health Evaluation

计量

蛀干昆虫的寄主选择及其在森林健康评价中的应用

English Abstract

Host Selection of Xylophagous Insects and Its Application in Forest Health Evaluation

全文HTML

目录

留言板

蛀干昆虫的寄主选择及其在森林健康评价中的应用

Host Selection of Xylophagous Insects and Its Application in Forest Health Evaluation

计量

出版历程

蛀干昆虫的寄主选择及其在森林健康评价中的应用

English Abstract

Host Selection of Xylophagous Insects and Its Application in Forest Health Evaluation

全文HTML

目录