蚂蚁利用资源的功能特征比较

武子文; 卢志兴; 陈又清

蚂蚁利用资源的功能特征比较

1.
中国林业科学研究院资源昆虫研究所, 云南昆明 650224
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金(31270561和31470493)
中图分类号: S763

Comparison of Ant's Functional Traits in Resource Utilization

1.
Research Institute of Resources Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
CLC number: S763

- 蚂蚁
- / 功能特征
- / 消耗资源量
- / 获取资源方式
- / 功能多样性
Abstract: In order to reveal the difference of functional traits of ants and study on ant's functional diversity, the functional traits of 17 ant species were measured. The results were as follows: (1) There was difference of functional traits in terms of resource utilization among ant species. Pachycondyla rufipes (Jerdon) was the largest, and Technomyrmex albipes (Smith) was the smallest one in the aspect of food consumption amount. Technomyrmex bicolor Emery and Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger), Camponotus nicobarensis (Mayr) and Pachycondyla zhengi Xu, Gnamptogenys bicolor (Emery) and Aphaenogaster beccarii Emery showed similarity in food consumption amount. (2) In the aspect of mode of resource utilization, Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) has the longest relative legs, but their functions were prior to nesting, the 2 species of Aphaenogaster, 3 species of Camponotus and the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) could run fast to acquire resource, the rest 10 ant species had better resource utilization abilities in complex habitat. The overall trend showed that the species from the same family and genus had the similar traits in terms of food consumption amount and mode of resource utilization than those from different family or genus; the reason of difference was mainly due to the significantly different body sizes regardless the family or genus.
- ants
- / functional traits
- / resource consumption amount
- / mode about resource utilization
- / functional diversity

[1]	Cameron T. 2002:the year of the 'diversity-ecosystem function'debate[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2002, 17(11):495-496.
[2]	Zhong W H, Cai Z C. Long-term effects of inorganic fertilizers on microbial biomass and community functional diversity in a paddy soil derived from quaternary red clay[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2007, 36(2):84-91.
[3]	Hooper D U, Vitousek P M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2008, 68(1):121-149.
[4]	Diaz S, Hodgson J G, Thompson K, et al. The plant traits that drive ecosystems:evidence from three continents[J]. Journal of vegetation science, 2004, 15(3):295-304.
[5]	Tilman D. Functional diversity[J]. Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 2001, 3(1):109-120.
[6]	Luck G W, Harrington R, Harrison P A, et al. Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services[J]. Bioscience, 2009, 59(3):223-235.
[7]	Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services:what do we need to know about their ecology?[J]. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8(5):468-479.
[8]	Valerie T. Eviner, F. Stuart Chapin III. Functional Matrix:A Conceptual Framework for Predicting Multiple Plant Effects on Ecosystem Processes[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, 2003, 34(34):455-485.
[9]	Hölldobler B. The ants[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1990.
[10]	Gómez J M, Valladares F, Puerta C. Differences between structural and functional environmental heterogeneity caused by seed dispersal[J]. Functional Ecology, 2004, 18(6):787-792.
[11]	Philpott S M, Armbrecht I. Biodiversity in tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants and ant diversity in predatory function[J]. Ecological Entomology, 2006, 31(4):369-377.
[12]	Lobry de Bruyn L A, Conacher A J. The role of termites and ants in soil modification:a review[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1990, 28(1):55-93.
[13]	Kaspari M, Weiser M D. Ant activity along moisture gradients in a Neotropicalforest[J]. Biotropica, 2000, 32(4a):703-711.
[14]	Gibb H, Stoklosa J, I. Warton D, et al. Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages[J]. Oecologia, 2014, 177(2):519-531.
[15]	陈又清, 王绍云. 不同寄主植物对云南紫胶虫自然种群的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(4):761-765.
[16]	卢志兴, 陈又清, 李巧,等. 云南紫胶虫种群数量对地表蚂蚁多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(19):6195-6202.
[17]	李巧, 陈又清, 郭萧,等. 云南元谋干热河谷不同生境地表蚂蚁多样性[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2007, 27(3):272-277.
[18]	张念念, 陈又清, 卢志兴,等. 云南橡胶林和天然次生林枯落物层蚂蚁物种多样性、群落结构差异及指示种[J]. 昆虫学报, 2013, 56(11):1314-1323.
[19]	吴坚, 王常禄. 中国蚂蚁[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 1995.
[20]	徐正会. 西双版纳自然保护区蚁科昆虫生物多样性研究[M]. 昆明:云南科技出版社, 2002.
[21]	Bihn J H, Gebauer G, Brandl R. Loss of functional diversity of ant assemblages in secondary tropical forests[J]. Ecology, 2010, 91(3):782-792.
[22]	Peters R H. The ecological implications of body size[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[23]	Kaspari M, Weiser M D. The size-grain hypothesis and interspecific scaling in ants[J]. Functional Ecology, 1999, 13(4):530-538.
[24]	Sarty M, Abbott K L, Lester P J. Habitat complexity facilitates coexistence in a tropical ant community[J]. Oecologia, 2006, 149(3):465-473.
[25]	Wiescher P T, Pearce-Duvet J M C, Feener D H. Assembling an ant community:species functional traits reflect environmental filtering[J]. Oecologia, 2012, 169(4):1063-1074.
[26]	Gibb H, Parr C L. Does structural complexity determine the morphology of assemblages? An experimental test on three continents[J].PlosOne, 2013, 8(5):e64005.
[27]	Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning:a mechanistic model[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1998,95(10):5632-5636.
[28]	Díaz S, Cabido M. Vive la difference:plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001, 16(11):646-655.
[29]	Villéger S, Mason N W H, Mouillot D. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology[J]. Ecology, 2008,89,2290-2301.

[1]	徐正会 , 吴定敏 , 陈志强 , 蒋兴成 . 高黎贡山自然保护区东坡水平带蚂蚁群落研究. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(6): 603-609.
[2]	孟益德 , 杜红岩 , 王璐 , 吕庚鑫 , 庆军 , 何凤 , 黄海燕 , 杜庆鑫 . 杜仲种质资源叶片表型性状多样性分析. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(5): 103-112. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.005.012
[3]	付兴飞 , 卢志兴 , 陈又清 . 兼性互利关系影响地表蚂蚁群落多样性的特点. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(5): 714-718.
[4]	赵婧文 , 王健敏 , 卢志兴 , 付兴飞 , 刀剑国 , 陈又清 . 兼性互利关系对树冠层活动蚂蚁多样性的影响. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(6): 807-811.
[5]	郭萧 , 徐正会 , 杨俊伍 , 史胜利 , 李巧 . 滇西北云岭东坡蚂蚁物种多样性研究. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(5): 660-667.
[6]	梅象信 , 徐正会 , 张继玲 , 赵宇翔 . 昆明西山森林公园东坡蚂蚁物种多样性研究. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(2): 170-175.
[7]	任奕炜 , 钟小瑛 , 衣华鹏 , 常耀 . 不同林分类型对叶功能性状、林下物种多样性及土壤养分的影响. 林业科学研究, 2023, 36(2): 161-168. doi: 10.12403/j.1001-1498.20220492
[8]	杨时宇 , 何承忠 , 赵一鹤 , 刘娟 , 王兵益 . 引进泰国甜角基因资源多样性的RAPD分析. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(1): 60-63.
[9]	裴淑兰 , 王凯 , 雷淑慧 . 中条山野生观赏树种资源的多样性研究. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(6): 861-868.
[10]	孙维敏 , 徐阳 , 龚榜初 , 吴开云 . 浙江省柿种质资源果实形状多样性研究. 林业科学研究, 2019, 32(5): 42-50. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2019.05.006
[11]	卢志兴 , 李可力 , 张念念 , 陈又清 . 巨桉林和天然次生林枯落物层蚂蚁多样性及指示种. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(4): 576-580.
[12]	周繇 . 石湖省级自然保护区观赏植物资源及其多样性研究. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17(5): 590-597.
[13]	周繇 . 石湖省级自然保护区药用植物资源及其多样性研究. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17(6): 731-740.
[14]	杨旭 , 徐阳 , 龚榜初 , 谢其均 . 大别山区两种柿资源种实表型性状的多样性. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(4): 188-196. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.004.020
[15]	赵婧文 , 卢志兴 , 陈又清 . 云南绿春县天然次生林和4种人工林树冠层蚂蚁群落多样性. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(5): 823-830. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.05.016
[16]	冯颖 , 陈晓鸣 . 食用昆虫的资源价值与可利用方式. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(1): 105-110.
[17]	刘敏 , 李龙 , 李海波 , 王祖华 . 梵净山典型植被类型的根系真菌群落结构及功能类群特征研究. 林业科学研究, 2023, 36(1): 47-58. doi: 10.12403/j.1001-1498.20220099
[18]	. 不同恢复时期红松阔叶林群落结构与多样性特征. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(4): -.
[19]	赵中华 , 惠刚盈 , 袁士云 , 刘文桢 . 小陇山锐齿栎天然林的树种多样性和结构特征. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(5): 605-610.
[20]	高润梅 , 郭晋平 , 郭跃东 , 张东旭 . 文峪河上游河岸林的群落结构与多样性特征. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(1): 74-81.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 2854
HTML全文浏览量: 191
PDF下载量: 1128
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

蚂蚁利用资源的功能特征比较

Comparison of Ant's Functional Traits in Resource Utilization

计量

蚂蚁利用资源的功能特征比较

English Abstract

Comparison of Ant's Functional Traits in Resource Utilization

全文HTML

目录

留言板

蚂蚁利用资源的功能特征比较

Comparison of Ant's Functional Traits in Resource Utilization

计量

出版历程

蚂蚁利用资源的功能特征比较

English Abstract

Comparison of Ant's Functional Traits in Resource Utilization

全文HTML

目录