晋西黄土区不同森林树种及其林地土壤养分含量的变化
The Nutrient Content Variations of Different Forest Species and the Forest Soil in Loess Region of Western Shanxi
-
摘要: ［目的］ 探究晋西黄土区不同树种营养器官（叶、枝、干、根）及其土壤的养分含量变化特征。［方法］ 通过野外样地调查和取样分析方法，对3种典型森林树种（刺槐、侧柏、辽东栎）不同器官及其林地土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷含量进行了研究，并探讨了不同树种叶片与其土壤C、N、P化学计量的关系。［结果］ 辽东栎、刺槐和侧柏的叶片有机碳含量分别为468.43、454.96、438.53 g·kg-1，刺槐、辽东栎和侧柏叶片的全氮含量分别为27.52、20.74、12.73 g·kg-1，辽东栎、侧柏和刺槐叶片的全磷含量分别为2.73、2.15、1.35 g·kg-1，叶片C:N值为侧柏>辽东栎>刺槐，C:P、N:P值分别为刺槐>侧柏>辽东栎、刺槐>辽东栎>侧柏；3个树种树枝的有机碳含量均最大，树叶的全氮含量均最大，而树干的全氮含量均最小。侧柏、辽东栎、刺槐树枝的全磷含量分别为3.07、3.07、1.87 g·kg-1，显著比其它器官的大；3种森林土壤的C、N、P含量均随土层的加深而降低，且0~10 cm土层的含量最大，C:N、C:P、N:P值随土层深度的变化不一致；刺槐叶片的有机碳、全磷含量与土壤C:N值显著或极显著负相关；侧柏叶片的有机碳含量均与土壤C:N、C:P、N:P值极显著负相关，叶片N:P值与土壤C:N、C:P、N:P值均极显著正相关；辽东栎叶片的有机碳含量、C:P值与土壤有机碳含量极显著负相关。［结论］ 辽东栎、刺槐和侧柏的有机碳含量均较高，分别为468.43、454.96、438.53 g·kg-1；辽东栎和刺槐对晋西黄土区干旱环境的防御能力比侧柏强，当地环境较适宜辽东栎的生长发育，而刺槐和侧柏的生长分别受土壤P和N的限制。Abstract: [Objective] To explore the nutrient content variation characteristics of vegetative organs (leaf, branch, stem and root) of different tree species and the forest soil in loess region of western Shanxi Province. [Method] The methods of investigation and samples analysis were used to study the contents of soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in different organs of three typical forest species (Robinia pseudoacacia, Platycladus orientalis, Quercus liaotungensis) and in the forest soil. The stoichiometric relationships of C, N and P between leaf and the soil were discussed. [Result] The results showed that the leaf SOC contents of Q. liaotungensis, R. pseudoacacia and P. orientalis were 468.43, 454.96 and 438.53 g·kg-1, the leaf TN contents of R. pseudoacacia, Q. liaotungensis and P. orientalis were 27.52, 20.74 and 12.73 g·kg-1, the leaf TP contents of Q. liaotungensis, P. orientalis and R. pseudoacacia were 2.73, 2.15 and 1.35 g·kg-1, the leaf C:N value decreased in the order of P. orientalis>Q. liaotungensis>R. pseudoacacia, the values of C:P and N:P decreased in the order of R. pseudoacacia, P. orientalis, Q. liaotungensis and R. pseudoacacia, Q. liaotungensis, P. orientalis respectively; The SOC content of branch of the three species were the largest. The leaf TN content was the largest, while the stem was the least of the three species. The branch TP contents of P. orientalis, Q. liaotungensis and R. pseudoacacia were 3.07, 3.07 and 1.87 g·kg-1, which were significantly larger than that of the other organs; The contents of SOC, TN and TP in the forest soil decreased with the increase of soil depth, and the 010 cm soil layer was the largest, the values of C:P, N:P and C:N in different forest soils were not consistent with the variation of soil depths; The leaf SOC and TP contents in R. pseudoacacia had an extremely significant negative correlation with the soil value of C:N; the leaf SOC content was significantly negatively correlated with the soil values of C:N, C:P and N:P, and the leaf value of N:P in P. orientalis was significantly positively correlated with the soil values of C:N, C:P and N:P; the leaf SOC content and value of C:P in Q. liaotungensis had a significantly negative correlation with soil SOC content. [Conclusion] The organic carbon content of Q. liaotungensis, R. pseudoacacia and P. orientalis were higher, with 468.43, 454.96, 438.53 g·kg-1 respectively; Q. liaotungensis and R. pseudoacacia owned stronger drought stress tolerance than P. orientalis in arid region on the Loess Plateau of Western Shanxi; The local environment was more suitable for the growth and development of Q. liaotungensis, while it would limt the growth of R. pseudoacacia and P. orientalis due to soil P and N, respectively.
-
Key words:
- forest species
- / nutrient content
- / correlation
- / loess region
-
[1] 曾德慧, 陈广生.生态化学计量学:复杂生命系统奥秘的探索[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6): 1007-1019. [2] Vitousek P M, Howarth R W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur?[J].Biogeochemistry,1991,13(2):87-115. [3] Deluca T H, Nilsson M C, Zackrisson O. Nitrogen mineralization and phenol accumulation along a fire Chrono sequence in northern Sweden [J].Oecologia, 2002, 133:206-214. [4] Anderson T, Elser J J, Hessen D O. Stoichiometry and population dynamics[J].Ecology Letters, 2004,7(9):884-900. [5] Urabe J, Kyle M, Makino W, et al. Reduced light increases herbivore production due to stoichiometric effects of light: nutrient balance[J].Ecology, 2002, 83(3):619-627. [6] Wardle D A, Walker L R, Bardgett R D. Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences[J].Science, 2004, 305(5683):509-513. [7] Lerman A, Mackenzie F T, Ver L M B. Nitrogen and phosphorous controls of the carbon cycle[J].Journal of Conference Abstracts, 2000,5(2):638. [8] Dijkstra F A, Pendall E, Morgan J A, et al. Climate change alters stoichiometry of phosphorus and nitrogen in a semiarid grassland[J].New Phytologist, 2012, 196(3):807-815. [9] Penuelas J, Rivas-Ubach A, Sardans J. The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: A review and perspectives[J].Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2012,14(1):33-47. [10] Reich P B J. Oleksyn. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(30):11001-11006. [11] 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8):3937-3947. [12] 程 滨, 赵永军, 张文广, 等. 生态化学计量学研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(6):1628-1637. [13] 朱秋莲, 邢肖毅, 张 宏, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(15):4674-4682. [14] 王晶苑, 王绍强, 李纫兰, 等. 中国四种森林类型主要优势植物的C:N:P化学计量学特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6): 587-595. [15] 李从娟, 雷加强, 徐新文, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地人工植被及土壤 C N P 的化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18):5760-5767. [16] 崔艳芳. 永定新河河口湿地翅碱蓬植物C、N、P化学计量特征及其与土壤环境的相关性[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2014. [17] 宋彦涛, 周道玮, 李 强, 等. 松嫩草地80种草本植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(3):222-230. [18] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:25-97. [19] 项文化, 黄志宏, 闫文德, 等. 森林生态系统碳氮循环功能耦合研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(7):2365-2372. [20] 平 川, 王传宽, 全先奎. 环境变化对兴安落叶松氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(8):1965-1974. [21] Elser J J, Fagan W F, Denno R F, et al. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs[J]. Nature, 2000, 408(6812): 578-580. [22] 俞月凤, 彭晚霞, 宋同清, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地不同森林类型植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(4):947-954. [23] 郑淑霞,上官周平. 黄土高原地区植物叶片养分组成的空间分布格局[J].自然科学进展, 2006, 16( 8) : 965-973. [24] 王凯博, 上官周平. 黄土丘陵区燕沟流域典型植物叶片 C、N、P 化学计量特征季节变化[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(17): 4985-4991. [25] 任书杰, 于贵瑞, 陶 波, 等. 中国东部南北样带 654 种植物叶片氮和磷的化学计量学特征研究[J]. 环境科学, 2007, 28(12): 1-9. [26] Chapin F S III, Schulze E D, Mooney H A. The ecology and economics of storage in plants [J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1990, 21: 423-447. [27] 曾昭霞, 王克林, 刘孝利, 等. 桂西北喀斯特森林植物-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(7): 682-693. [28] Elser J J, Bracken M E S, Cleland E E, et al. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10(12):1135-1142. [29] Koerselman W, Meuleman A F M. The vegetation N:P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33: 1441-1450. [30] 刘万德, 苏建荣, 李帅锋, 等. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林演替系列植物和土壤 C、N、P 化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23):6581-6590. [31] Cleveland C C, Liptzin D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a"Redfield ratio"for the microbial biomass? [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85(3): 235-252. [32] 黄昌勇, 李保国, 潘兴根, 等. 土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. [33] 朱秋莲. 黄土丘陵区不同植被带立地条件对植物-枯落物-土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[D]. 陕西: 西北农林科技大学, 2013. [34] 王长庭, 龙瑞军, 曹广民, 等. 高寒草甸不同类型草地土壤养分与物种多样性一生产力关系[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 39(1): 1-8. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2926
- HTML全文浏览量: 342
- PDF下载量: 1245
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
