-
森林植被与地下水之间有着复杂的相互关系。地下水水位变化影响森林群落结构组成与生长状况,从而影响到整个森林生态系统的稳定性[1-2]。同时,森林植被可通过其林冠层对降水的截留作用以及森林土壤对水源的涵养作用,对地下水水位进行调节[3-4]。在干旱或半干旱地区,水分是影响植被生长最重要的限制因子,地下水往往是深根植物生长所需的较稳定的水源之一;而在降水充沛、水资源丰富的地区,虽然植物可以通过多个途径获得生长所需的水分,但是地下水水位的变化仍是影响湿地物种多样性的一个重要因素[5-7]。目前,关于森林植被与地下水之间相互关系的研究大部分集中在干旱和半干旱地区,而在水资源丰富的湿润地区,相关研究则相对较缺乏。江苏里下河平原地区,水网密布,湿地面积广阔,具有大面积的人工淡水湿地森林,不仅能净化当地水质,而且对提升区域森林生态系统功能、调节区域水分平衡、保持生物多样性、蓄洪防旱、改善生态环境、维持人类的生存和发展起到重要作用[8]。本研究以江苏省里下河平原两种典型的淡水湿地森林为研究对象,研究其地下水水位动态变化特征及其影响因素,为里下河地区淡水湿地植被的恢复和保护提供理论参考。
江苏里下河不同湿地植被地下水水位动态及影响因素
Dynamics of Groundwater Level and Its Affecting Factors under Different Wetland Vegetation of Lixiahe Plain, Jiangsu Province
-
摘要:
目的 了解水资源丰富的里下河平原典型淡水湿地植被地下水水位的动态变化特征及主要影响因素,为该区淡水湿地植被的恢复和保护提供参考依据。 方法 以江苏省里下河平原两种典型淡水湿地植被(池杉针叶林和杨树阔叶林)为研究对象,分别布设2个地下水水位观测井,并对井中地下水水位动态进行长期观测,分析其月际和季节动态变化特征;同时采集2016年9月至2017年8月1个水文年的降水量和气温数据,分析地下水水位动态变化与气温和降水量变化的相关性。 结果 表明:两种典型淡水湿地植被地下水水位的动态变化存在显著的差异,池杉林几乎全年淹水,其月均地下水水位大于杨树林,而杨树林月际间地下水水位变化幅度相对较大,表现出季节差异;从季节动态看,池杉林和杨树林夏季的地下水平均水位相对于其他季节均明显要低。两种淡水湿地森林地下水水位的变化受降水量影响程度不同,杨树林地下水水位月动态表现出滞后于降水量变化约1个月,而这种滞后性未体现在池杉林中。杨树林和池杉林地下水的月均水位与月均气温间均呈现出极显著的负相关关系。 结论 不同淡水湿地森林的地下水水位动态具有不同特征,受环境因素的影响程度也有差异。在水资源丰富的里下河平原,降水量大小并不是影响该区淡水湿地植被地下水水位动态变化的关键因子,而气温则是主要影响因素。 Abstract:Objective To understand the dynamic characteristics of groundwater level in typical freshwater wetland vegetation in the Lixiahe Plain which is rich in water resources in Jiangsu Province. Method Two groundwater depth monitoring wells were set respectively in two typical freshwater wetland vegetations (Taxodium ascendens coniferous forest and Poplar broadleaved forest) in Lixiahe Plain of Jiangsu province. The monthly and seasonal variation of groundwater level were analyzed based on the long-term observation data of groundwater level. In addition, the temperature and precipitation data of the forests during the hydrological year from September 2016 to August 2017 were also collected. The correlations between the dynamics of groundwater level and the variation of temperature and precipitation were analyzed. Result There were significant differences in the dynamics of groundwater level between the two freshwater wetland vegetations. T. ascendens forest was almost flooded all the year round, and its monthly mean groundwater level was higher than that of Poplar forest. The amplitude of monthly variation of groundwater level in Poplar forest was larger than that of T. ascendens forest, and it showed a seasonal variation. On the seasonal scale, the average groundwater level in T. ascendens forest and Poplar forest in summer was significantly lower than that in other seasons. The effects of precipitation on the variation of groundwater level of the two freshwater wetland vegetations were different. The change of groundwater level in Poplar forest lagged behind the amount of precipitation about one month, while this lag did not appear in T. ascendens forest. The average monthly groundwater level was negatively correlated with the mean monthly temperature in both vegetation types. Conclusion It is concluded that there are differences in the dynamics of groundwater level and the influencing factors between the two types of freshwater wetland vegetation. In Lixiahe Plain with abundant water resources, temperature rather than the precipitation is the key factor affecting the change of groundwater level in the freshwater wetland vegetation. -
Key words:
- wetland vegetation
- / groundwater level
- / precipitation
- / Lixiahe Plain
-
-
[1] Johansen O M, Andersen D K, Ejrnæs R, et al. Relations between vegetation and water level in groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems (GWDTEs)[J]. Limnologica, 2017, 68(1): 130-141. [2] Zhu L, Gong H, Dai Z, et al. An integrated assessment of the impact of precipitation and groundwater on vegetation growth in arid and semiarid areas[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74(6): 5009-5021. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4513-5 [3] 贺芳芳, 戴怀林, 陈风喜. 上海市郊林带区与非林带区地下水水位及地表径流变化对比分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(3):707-711. [4] 韩 路, 王海珍, 牛建龙, 等. 荒漠河岸林胡杨群落特征对地下水水位梯度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(20):6836-6846. [5] 陈 婕, 徐 庆, 高德强, 等. 西鄂尔多斯半日花及霸王的水分利用[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 52(2):47-56. [6] Seeyan S, Merkel B J, Abo R K, et al. Investigation of the Relationship between Groundwater Level Fluctuation and Vegetation Cover by using NDVI for Shaqlawa Basin, Kurdistan Region – Iraq[J]. Journal of Geography and Geology, 2014, 6(3): 187-202. [7] 赵新风, 李伯岭, 王 炜, 等. 极端干旱区8个绿洲防护林地土壤水盐分布特征及其与地下水关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(3):75-79. [8] 高德强, 张蓓蓓, 徐 庆, 等. 氢氧稳定同位素在淡水湿地森林水文过程研究中的应用[J]. 世界林业研究, 2017, 30(2):20-25. [9] 叶正伟, 许有鹏, 潘光波. 江淮下游降水特征及其对水位的影响研究——以里下河腹部地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(11):1922-1934. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.11.009 [10] 李连庆, 曹文元, 王玉龙, 等. 里下河低湿地适生树种调查及造林技术初步研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2012, 39(2):33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2012.02.007 [11] Stasik R, Korytowski M. Analysis of groundwater level changes in clearcutting area of chosen forest habitats[J]. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 2015, 16(4): 59-64. [12] Csafordi P, Szabo A, Balog K, et al. Factors controlling the daily change in groundwater level during the growing season on the Great Hungarian Plain: a statistical approach[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(20): 675. doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-7002-1 [13] 黄金廷, 尹立河, 董佳秋, 等. 毛乌素沙地地下水浅埋区沙柳蒸腾对降水的响应[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2013, 41(11):217-222. [14] Hirano T, Kusin K, Limin S, et al. Evapotranspiration of tropical peat swamp forests[J]. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21(5): 1914-1927. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12653 [15] 李 雪, 叶思源, 宋 凡, 等. 京津冀平原区地下水水位变化主导因素的定量识别研究[J]. 水文, 2018, 38(1):21-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0852.2018.01.004 [16] 李 琦. 渭河流域地下水对气候变化的响应研究[D].西安: 长安大学, 2015. [17] 贾瑞亮, 周金龙, 李 巧. 我国气候变化对地下水资源影响研究的主要进展[J]. 地下水, 2012, 34(1):1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2012.01.01t [18] 高德强, 徐 庆, 张蓓蓓, 等. 鼎湖山大气降水氢氧同位素特征及水汽来源[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(3):384-391. [19] 马迎宾, 徐 庆, 高德强, 等. 汤浦水库湿地森林区大气降水氢氧同位素特征及水汽来源[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(3):37-44. [20] 张 林, 王春景. 清苑县降雨量变化对地下水水位的影响分析[J]. 地下水, 2016, 38(3):66-67. [21] Faridatul M I. A comparative study on precipitation and groundwater level interaction in the highly urbanized area and its periphery[J]. Current Urban Studies, 2018, 6(2): 209-222. doi: 10.4236/cus.2018.62012 [22] 于致龙, 韩 辉, 宋 鸽. 章古台地下水水位与降水量变化动态相关性分析[J]. 防护林科技, 2018(3):26-29. [23] 幺 文, 吴淑梅. 地下水位与降水量的变化规律及其影响[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2017(13):51-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6921.2017.13.026 [24] Mercau J L, Nosetto M D, Bert F, et al. Shallow groundwater dynamics in the Pampas: Climate, landscape and crop choice effects[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 163(1): 159-168. [25] Chen Z, Grasby S E, Osadetz K G, et al. Relation between climate variability and groundwater levels in the upper carbonate aquifer, southern Manitoba, Canada[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 290(1): 43-62. [26] 马雄德, 范立民, 严 戈, 等. 植被对矿区地下水水位变化响应研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(1):44-49. [27] 王 平, 于静洁, 闵雷雷, 等. 额济纳绿洲浅层地下水动态监测研究及其进展[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(5):982-993. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2014.05.08