The Physiological Responses of Plantago asiatica L.and Viola philippcia Cav.to Water Stress

MA Wu-chang; WANG Yan; PENG Zhen-hua

Volume 19 Issue 5

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2006 > 19(5): 633-637

Citation:

The Physiological Responses of Plantago asiatica L.and Viola philippcia Cav.to Water Stress

1.
Research Institute of Forestry,CAF

Received Date: 2006-02-28

Abstract

Treating with different concentration of PEG 6000 in 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution for 3 days,the physiological indexes,such as,Pn,chlorophyll fluorescence parameters,cell membrane permeability,MDA and relative water contents of Plantago asiatica L.and Viola philippcia Cav.were studied.The Pn of P.asiatica and V.philippcia gradually decreased when water stress increased.Stomatal factor was the dominant factor of Pn decreasing of P.asiatica,while the Pn decreasing of V.philippcia was induced dominantly by both stomatal and non-stomatal factors.By the stress of ψw=-0.84 MPa for 3 days,P.asiatica behaved as light water stress,while V.philippcia was moderate water stress,indicating both the plants had good drought resistance.Values of Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo in the two speeies gradually decreased with increasing water stress.Compared to the control,cell membrane permeability of P.asiatica and V.philippcia increased by 54% and 126%,respectively,under 0.25 kg·L-1 of PEG treatment.By the synthetic analyzing of all the indexes,the authors concluded that P.asiatica is preferable to adapt to water stress,and net photosynthetic rate,permeability and relative water content could be used for comparing the drought resistance of different species.
- Plantago asiatica,
- Viola philippcia,
- water stress,
- drought resistance identification,
- ground cover plant,
- polyethylene glycol

References

[J]. 中国园林, 2003 (9): 54 ~ 57
[2]	张玲慧, 夏宜平. 地被植物在园林中的应用及现状研究
[J].安徽农业大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 24(4): 391~ 394
[4]	汪天, 李万莲, 高文芳, 等. 地被植物在园林中的选择与应用
[5]	杨玉凤. 车前草))) 有待开发的保健野菜
[J]. 吉林农业, 2003(8): 26
[7]	张国秀, 张岩, 张立刚. 车前的用途
[J]. 中国林副特产, 2000(4): 40
[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2002(2): 19
[10]	马成亮. 紫花地丁的栽培及利用价值
[J]. 现代农业, 1999(1): 23
[12]	吴永忠. 中药材车前子的栽培技术
[13]	阎永庆, 范金萍, 王洪亮. 紫花地丁分株移栽试验
[J]. 北方园艺,1998(Z1): 140~ 141
[15]	徐本美, 孙运涛, 孙超, 等. 紫花地丁种子的萌发性状及其栽培繁殖
[J]. 种子, 2003(5): 24~ 27
[17]	蔡朵珍, 高振生, 石飞华. 两种草坪地被植物紫花地丁和早开堇菜的同工酶研究
[J]. 中国草地, 1998 (1): 48 ~ 49, 53
[19]	石爱平, 王红利, 郭睿, 等. 紫花地丁的几种抗逆指标研究初探
[J]. 北京农学院报, 1997, 12 (1): 48 ~ 53
[J]. 亚热带植物通讯, 1994, 23 (2): 61 ~ 64
[22]	张云贵, 谢永红. PEG在模拟植物干旱胁迫和组织培养中的应用
[J]. Plant Physio1, 1962, 51: 914 ~ 916
[24]	M ich elB E, Kau fmannM R. The osmotic poten tial ofpolyethy lethylene g lycol 6000
[25]	M ich elB E. E valuat ion of thewater potent ials of polyethylene glycol8000 both in the p resen ce and ab sen ce of other solutes
[J]. P lan tPhysio,l 1983, 72: 66~ 70
[A]. In: Gov ind J. Ph otosynthes is (Vol ò)
[28]	Berry JA, Down tonW J S. E nvironmental regu lat ion ofphotosyn th es is
[M]. 1982: 263~ 343
[30]	刘祖祺, 张石成. 植物抗性生理学
[31]	上海植物生理研究所. 现代植物生理学实验手册
[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,1994: 371~ 372
[33]	张宪政, 苏正淑. 作物水分亏缺伤害生理研究概况
[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999
[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1996, 27(1): 85~ 91
[36]	吕庆, 郑荣梁. 干旱及活性氧引起小麦膜脂过氧化与脱酯化
[J]. 中国科学(C辑), 1996, 26(1): 26~ 30
[38]	H isao T C. Plant responses to water stress
[J]. Ann Rev P lan tPhysio,l 1973, 24: 519 ~ 570
[40]	王沙生, 高荣孚, 吴贯明. 植物生理学(第二版)
[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1991: 363~ 366
[42]	胡新生, 王世绩1 树木水分胁迫生理与耐旱性研究进展及展望
[J]. 林业科学, 1998, 34(2): 77 ~ 89
[44]	陈立松, 刘星辉. 作物抗旱鉴定指标的种类及其综合评价
[J].福建农业大学学报, 1997, 26(1): 48~ 55

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3042) PDF downloads(1368) Cited by()

Proportional views

The Physiological Responses of Plantago asiatica L.and Viola philippcia Cav.to Water Stress

1. Research Institute of Forestry,CAF

Received Date: 2006-02-28

Abstract: Treating with different concentration of PEG 6000 in 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution for 3 days,the physiological indexes,such as,Pn,chlorophyll fluorescence parameters,cell membrane permeability,MDA and relative water contents of Plantago asiatica L.and Viola philippcia Cav.were studied.The Pn of P.asiatica and V.philippcia gradually decreased when water stress increased.Stomatal factor was the dominant factor of Pn decreasing of P.asiatica,while the Pn decreasing of V.philippcia was induced dominantly by both stomatal and non-stomatal factors.By the stress of ψw=-0.84 MPa for 3 days,P.asiatica behaved as light water stress,while V.philippcia was moderate water stress,indicating both the plants had good drought resistance.Values of Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo in the two speeies gradually decreased with increasing water stress.Compared to the control,cell membrane permeability of P.asiatica and V.philippcia increased by 54% and 126%,respectively,under 0.25 kg·L-1 of PEG treatment.By the synthetic analyzing of all the indexes,the authors concluded that P.asiatica is preferable to adapt to water stress,and net photosynthetic rate,permeability and relative water content could be used for comparing the drought resistance of different species.

HTML

Reference (45)

[1]	[J]. 中国园林, 2003 (9): 54 ~ 57
[2]	张玲慧, 夏宜平. 地被植物在园林中的应用及现状研究
[3]	[J].安徽农业大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 24(4): 391~ 394
[4]	汪天, 李万莲, 高文芳, 等. 地被植物在园林中的选择与应用
[5]	杨玉凤. 车前草))) 有待开发的保健野菜
[6]	[J]. 吉林农业, 2003(8): 26
[7]	张国秀, 张岩, 张立刚. 车前的用途
[8]	[J]. 中国林副特产, 2000(4): 40
[9]	[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2002(2): 19
[10]	马成亮. 紫花地丁的栽培及利用价值
[11]	[J]. 现代农业, 1999(1): 23
[12]	吴永忠. 中药材车前子的栽培技术
[13]	阎永庆, 范金萍, 王洪亮. 紫花地丁分株移栽试验
[14]	[J]. 北方园艺,1998(Z1): 140~ 141
[15]	徐本美, 孙运涛, 孙超, 等. 紫花地丁种子的萌发性状及其栽培繁殖
[16]	[J]. 种子, 2003(5): 24~ 27
[17]	蔡朵珍, 高振生, 石飞华. 两种草坪地被植物紫花地丁和早开堇菜的同工酶研究
[18]	[J]. 中国草地, 1998 (1): 48 ~ 49, 53
[19]	石爱平, 王红利, 郭睿, 等. 紫花地丁的几种抗逆指标研究初探
[20]	[J]. 北京农学院报, 1997, 12 (1): 48 ~ 53
[21]	[J]. 亚热带植物通讯, 1994, 23 (2): 61 ~ 64
[22]	张云贵, 谢永红. PEG在模拟植物干旱胁迫和组织培养中的应用
[23]	[J]. Plant Physio1, 1962, 51: 914 ~ 916
[24]	M ich elB E, Kau fmannM R. The osmotic poten tial ofpolyethy lethylene g lycol 6000
[25]	M ich elB E. E valuat ion of thewater potent ials of polyethylene glycol8000 both in the p resen ce and ab sen ce of other solutes
[26]	[J]. P lan tPhysio,l 1983, 72: 66~ 70
[27]	[A]. In: Gov ind J. Ph otosynthes is (Vol ò)
[28]	Berry JA, Down tonW J S. E nvironmental regu lat ion ofphotosyn th es is
[29]	[M]. 1982: 263~ 343
[30]	刘祖祺, 张石成. 植物抗性生理学
[31]	上海植物生理研究所. 现代植物生理学实验手册
[32]	[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,1994: 371~ 372
[33]	张宪政, 苏正淑. 作物水分亏缺伤害生理研究概况
[34]	[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999
[35]	[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1996, 27(1): 85~ 91
[36]	吕庆, 郑荣梁. 干旱及活性氧引起小麦膜脂过氧化与脱酯化
[37]	[J]. 中国科学(C辑), 1996, 26(1): 26~ 30
[38]	H isao T C. Plant responses to water stress
[39]	[J]. Ann Rev P lan tPhysio,l 1973, 24: 519 ~ 570
[40]	王沙生, 高荣孚, 吴贯明. 植物生理学(第二版)
[41]	[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1991: 363~ 366
[42]	胡新生, 王世绩1 树木水分胁迫生理与耐旱性研究进展及展望
[43]	[J]. 林业科学, 1998, 34(2): 77 ~ 89
[44]	陈立松, 刘星辉. 作物抗旱鉴定指标的种类及其综合评价
[45]	[J].福建农业大学学报, 1997, 26(1): 48~ 55

The Physiological Responses of Plantago asiatica L.and Viola philippcia Cav.to Water Stress

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

The Physiological Responses of Plantago asiatica L.and Viola philippcia Cav.to Water Stress

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content