Study on the Role of EPS and LPS of Ra lston ia solanacea rum in Euca lyptusu rophylla ×E. grandis Root Adsorption and Ingression

WANG Sheng-kun; WANG Jun; XU Da-ping

In this experiment, the role of extracellular polysaccharides ( EPS) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) werestudied by detecting the number of Ralstonia solanacearum in Eucalyptus urophy lla ×E. grandis root adsorp tion andingression. The results showed that the number of GN1 and 93B in adsorp tion and ingression increased obviouslywhen the rootswere treated with EPS, while decreased evidently with LPS in 6 h after inoculation. The number ofbacteria washed off EPS decreased evidently in adsorp tion and ingression to the roots. In comparison, the number ofbacteria washed off both EPS and LPS had the same decreasing tendency, but not so evident as the former. Theseresults demonstrated that EPS p layed a role in enhancing the adsorp tion and ingression of R. solanacea rum to theroots of Eucalyptus urophy lla ×E. grandis, while LPS had inhibitory effect.

1. Research Institute of Trop ical Forestry, CAF, Guangzhou　510520, Guangdong, China

2. College of Forestry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou　510640, Guangdong, China

Abstract: In this experiment, the role of extracellular polysaccharides ( EPS) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) werestudied by detecting the number of Ralstonia solanacearum in Eucalyptus urophy lla ×E. grandis root adsorp tion andingression. The results showed that the number of GN1 and 93B in adsorp tion and ingression increased obviouslywhen the rootswere treated with EPS, while decreased evidently with LPS in 6 h after inoculation. The number ofbacteria washed off EPS decreased evidently in adsorp tion and ingression to the roots. In comparison, the number ofbacteria washed off both EPS and LPS had the same decreasing tendency, but not so evident as the former. Theseresults demonstrated that EPS p layed a role in enhancing the adsorp tion and ingression of R. solanacea rum to theroots of Eucalyptus urophy lla ×E. grandis, while LPS had inhibitory effect.

HTML

Reference (21)

[1]	王卉,任欣正. 青枯菌在番茄抗、感病品种根部的吸附、侵入和繁殖[J]. 植物病理学报, 1993, 23 (2) : 143～150
[2]	王丽,汪矛,杨世杰. 青枯菌侵染番茄幼根的扫描电镜观察[J].农业生物技术学报, 1999, 7 (2) : 157～160
[3]	罗焕亮,王军,张景宁. 木麻黄青枯菌的致病性与其根表吸附及根内增殖关系的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15 (1) : 21～27
[4]	董汉松,王金生,方中达. 菌体脂多糖在大白菜软腐欧文氏菌对寄主根表吸附中的作用[J]. 微生物学报, 1993, 33 (2) : 144～150
[5]	王军,苏海,岑炳沾. 林木青枯病研究综述[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1997, 18 (4) : 118～121
[6]	向妙莲,冉隆贤. 桉树青枯病研究进展[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2004,23 (1) : 37～40
[7]	韦爱梅,王军. 我国植物青枯病抗病性研究新进展[J]. 广东林业科技, 2004, 20 (4) : 46～49
[8]	王军. 青枯菌对植物的致病机制及其调节[J]. 林业科学, 2005,41 (3) : 142～147
[9]	Kelman A. The relationship of pathogenicity in Pseudom onas solanacearum to colony appearance on a tertrazolium medium[J]. Phytopathology, 1954, 64: 293～295
[10]	Husain A, Kelaman A. Relation of slime p roduction to the mechanism of wilting and pathogenicity of Pseudom onas solanacearum[J]. Phytopathology, 1958, 48: 155～165
[11]	Backer C J, NeilsonM J, Sequeira L. Chemical characterization ofthe lipopolysaccharide of Pseudom onas solanacearum [J]. App liedand EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 1984, 47 (5) : 1096～1100
[12]	张龙翔. 生化实验方法和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,1994: 14～15
[13]	WhatleyM N, Hunter N, CantrellM A. Lipopolysaccharide composition of the will pathogen Pseudom onas solanacearum correlationwith the hypersensitive response in tobacco [J]. Plant Physio,1980, 65 (3) : 557～559
[14]	Denny T P. Involvement of bacterial polysaccharides in p lant pathogenesis[J]. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 1995, 33: 173～197
[15]	Denny T P. Autoregulator-dependent control of extracellular polysaccharide p roduction in phytopathogenic bacteria[J]. European Journal of p lant pathology, 1999, 105 (5) : 417～430
[16]	SchellM A. Control of virulence and pathogenicity genes of Ralstonia Solanacearum by an elaborate sensory network[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2000, 38: 263～292
[17]	Araud-Razou I, Vasse J, Montrozie H, et al. Detection and visualizationof themajor acidic exopolysaccharide of Ralstonia solanacearum and itsrole in tomato root infection and vascular colonization [J]. EuropeanJournal of Plant Pathology, 1998, 104 (8) : 795～809
[18]	Pueppke S G. Plant-Microbe Interactions, Molecular and GeneticPerspectivesVol. 1 [M]. New York:M P C, 1984: 215～261
[19]	NewmanM A, Roepenack E V, DanielsM, et al. Lipopolysaccharides and p lant responses to phytopathogenic bacteria[J]. MolecularPlant Pathology, 2000, 1 (1) : 25～31
[20]	Erbs G, NewmanM A. The role of lipololysaccharides in inductionof p lant defence responses[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2003, 4(5) : 421～425
[21]	Schouten H J. A possible role in pathogenesis for the swelling of extracellular slime of Erwina amylovora at increasing water potential[J]. Neth J Plant Pathol, 1989, 95 ( Supp lement 1) : 169～174

Study on the Role of EPS and LPS of Ra lston ia solanacea rum in Euca lyptusu rophylla ×E. grandis Root Adsorption and Ingression

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views