Plant Spec ies D iversity ofMa in Forest Commun ity Types inSan Jiangyuan Na tiona l Na ture Reserve

HE You-jun; CUI Guo-fa; ZOU Da-lin; ZHENG Jie; DONG Jian-sheng; LI Yong-bo

The characteristics of fourmain forest community types were analyzed by typ ical samp ling technology, αdiversity andβdiversitywere calculated with various calculation methods. The results showed that: (1) In fourmainforest communities of Picea crassifolia, Picea lik iangensis var. balfouriana, Picea purpurea and Sabina tibetica, α diversity which rep resented by Shannon-wiener index and Gleason richness index had the highest value in herb layers,the medium in shrub layers and the lowest in tree layers. (2) Among the 4 main forest communities, the ordinationorder ofα diversity in tree layers from high to low was that Picea crassifolia community > P. pu rpu rea community >S abina tibetica community > P. likiangensis var. balfou riana community. (3) There were no significant difference ofspecies diversity in shrub layers among Picea crassifolia comm unity, P. purpurea community and P. lik iangensis varbalfouriana community, which of them distributed in shade slopes, however, S abina tibetica community distributedin sunny slopes had the lowest species diversity in shrub layers because of grazing disturbance and natural conditionsof sunny slopes. (4) Species diversity in herb species of Sabina tibetica communitywas higher than other communities which distributed in shade slope. (5) Here, β diversity indicated that the similar degree of species compositionamong communities which was determined by ecological range and biological characteristics of dominant species.

1. College of Nature Reserve, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing　100083, China

2. Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information,CAF,Beijing　100091, China

3. Forestry Bureau of Huairou District in Beijing,Beijing　101400, China

4. Forestry Bureau ofQinghai Province, Xining　810007,Qinghai, China

Abstract: The characteristics of fourmain forest community types were analyzed by typ ical samp ling technology, αdiversity andβdiversitywere calculated with various calculation methods. The results showed that: (1) In fourmainforest communities of Picea crassifolia, Picea lik iangensis var. balfouriana, Picea purpurea and Sabina tibetica, α diversity which rep resented by Shannon-wiener index and Gleason richness index had the highest value in herb layers,the medium in shrub layers and the lowest in tree layers. (2) Among the 4 main forest communities, the ordinationorder ofα diversity in tree layers from high to low was that Picea crassifolia community > P. pu rpu rea community >S abina tibetica community > P. likiangensis var. balfou riana community. (3) There were no significant difference ofspecies diversity in shrub layers among Picea crassifolia comm unity, P. purpurea community and P. lik iangensis varbalfouriana community, which of them distributed in shade slopes, however, S abina tibetica community distributedin sunny slopes had the lowest species diversity in shrub layers because of grazing disturbance and natural conditionsof sunny slopes. (4) Species diversity in herb species of Sabina tibetica communitywas higher than other communities which distributed in shade slope. (5) Here, β diversity indicated that the similar degree of species compositionamong communities which was determined by ecological range and biological characteristics of dominant species.

HTML

Reference (20)

[1]	郭正刚,刘慧霞,孙学刚,等. 白龙江上游地区森林植物群落物种多样性的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27 (3) : 388～395
[2]	周本智,傅懋毅,李正才,等. 浙西北天然次生林群落物种多样性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18 (4) : 406～411
[3]	李博. 生态学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社: 2000: 339～345
[4]	陶建平,臧润国. 海南霸王岭热带山地雨林林隙幼苗库动态规律研究[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 40 (3) : 33～38
[5]	SheilD. Long-term observations of rain forest succession, tree diversity and responses to disturbance[J]. Plant Ecol, 2001, 155: 183～199
[6]	Nagaike T , Kamitani T,Nakashizuka T. Plant species diversity in abandoned copp ice forests in a temperate deciduous forest area of central Japan[J]. Plant Ecol, 2003, 166: 145～156
[7]	贺金生,陈伟烈. 陆地植物群落物种多样性的梯度变化特征[J].生态学报, 1997, 17 (1) : 91～99
[8]	李宗善,唐建维,郑征,等. 西双版纳热带山地雨林的植物多样性研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28 (6) : 833～843
[9]	宋爱云,刘世荣,史作民,等. 卧龙自然保护区亚高山草甸植物群落物种多样性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 (6) : 767～772
[10]	胡理乐,刘琪,闫伯前,等. 生态恢复后的千烟洲植物群落种类组成及结构特征[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 (6) : 807～812
[11]	郝朝运,刘鹏,邬周伟. 浙江中部七子花种群结构与空间分布格局的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 (6) : 778～784
[12]	陈光升,钟章成. 重庆缙云山常绿阔叶林群落物种多样性与土壤因子的关系[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2004, 10 (1) : 12～17
[13]	王代懿,容丽,梅再美,等. 喀斯特石漠化生态治理区结构与物种多样性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2005, 25 (2) : 31～35
[14]	KalkhanM A, Stohlgren T J. Usingmulti-scale samp ling and spatialcross2correlation to investigate patterns of p lant species richness[J]. EnvironMonitoring Assessment, 2000, 64: 591～605
[15]	白永飞,李凌浩,黄建辉,等. 内蒙古高原针茅草原植物多样性与植物功能群组成对群落初级生产力稳定性的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2001, 43 (3) : 280～287
[16]	马克平. 生物多样性的测度方法α多样性的测度方法(上)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994a, 2 (3) : 162～168
[17]	马克平. 生物多样性的测度方法α多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994b, 2 (4) : 231～239
[18]	吴玉虎. 隆务河流域植物区系研究[J]. 云南植物研究, 2002,24 (2) : 155～169
[19]	曹仪植,宋占午. 植物生理学[M]. 兰州:兰州大学出版社, 1998
[20]	朱玉贤, 李毅. 现代分子生物学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1997

Plant Spec ies D iversity ofMa in Forest Commun ity Types inSan Jiangyuan Na tiona l Na ture Reserve

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views