Soil Environment Quality Assessment of Forest Landwith Different Parent Mater ia ls in Ka sta Mounta in Area
-
1.
Ecology and Environment Department of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China
-
2.
Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, CAF
-
Received Date:
2006-12-22
-
Abstract
The soil environment quality of woodland with different parentmaterials( limestone, dolomite limestone, limestoneshale, dolomite, limestone sand inclusion shale) in Kasta mountain area was assessed with Analytic Hierarchy Process andPrincipal Component Analysis methods. The results indicated that the soil fertility quality of the soil developed from limestone shale was the best, and the soil developed from dolomite limestone was the worst. The soil developed from limestoneshale showed the best heavy metals quality, and the soil developed from dolomite was the worst. The soil developed fromlimestone shale had the best stand condition quality, and the soil developed from limestone sand inclusion shale was theworst. The results also showed that the order of the soil environment quality was: limestone shale > limestone > dolomitelimestone > dolomite > limestone sand inclusion shale.
-
-
References
[1]
|
黄昌勇. 土壤学[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000
|
[2]
|
潘根兴. 地球表层系统土壤学[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2000
|
[3]
|
Abrahams P W. Soils: their imp lications to human health [J]. TheScience of Total Environment, 2002, 291: 1~32 |
[4]
|
朱颜明,何岩. 环境地理学导论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2002
|
[5]
|
乌当区综合农业区划编写组. 贵阳市卷———乌当区综合农业区划[M]. 贵阳:贵州人民出版社, 1989
|
[6]
|
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1998
|
[7]
|
奚旦立. 环境监测(修订版) [M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 1996(2001重印)
|
[8]
|
王建国,杨林章,单艳红. 模糊数学在土壤质量评价中的应用研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2001, 38 (2) : 176~ 183
|
[9]
|
朱青. 两种模糊数学模型在土壤重金属综合污染评价中的应用与比较[J]. 环境保护科学, 2004, 30 (123) : 53~57
|
[10]
|
宋之杰,高晓红. 一种多指标综合评价中确定指标权重的方法[J]. 燕山大学学报, 2002, 26 (1) : 20~22, 26
|
-
-
Proportional views
-