• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Influence of the Photoper iod and Tempera ture on Larva l Developmenta lPer iods of the Grea t Mormon Butterfly Papilio m em non L innaeus

  • Received Date: 2007-01-21
  • The growth and development of larval of Papilio m em non were investigated under different photoperiodsand temperatures which could be controlled in the climate2box. The effects of photoperiod and temperature on larvaldevelopmental periods of Papilio m em non were very remarkable. At same temperature, larval developmental periodshad significant difference. At 20 ℃ and during daylength of 12~14 h, the larval developmental periodswere in thescope of 39. 3~48. 5 days, and the margin between of the longest and shortest periodswas 9. 2 days. At 25 ℃ andduring daylength of 11~15 h, larval developmental periodswere in the scope of 25. 4~36 days, and the margin between of the longest and shortest periodswas 10. 6 days. At 30 ℃ and during daylength of 11~15 h, larval developmental periodswere in the scope of 19. 6~29. 0 days, and the margin between of the longest and shortest periodswas 9. 6 days. At the same daylength, larval developmental periods became shorter when the temperature was rising. Under daylengthes of 12. 0, 12. 5, 13. 0, 13. 5 and 14. 0 h, the developmental threshold temperature of larvawere 13. 6, 13. 3, 9. 2, 12. 2, and 7. 5 ℃, the temperature effective thermal sum were 332. 7, 340. 5, 372. 1, 350. 9and 475. 4 degree-days. At certain extent, the developmental threshold temperature and temperature effective thermal sum of larva were affected by photoperiod.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 吕龙石,金大勇,朴锦. 温度与光周期对麝凤蝶生长发育的影响[J]. 昆虫知识, 2004, 41 (6), 572~574

    [2] 顾茂彬, 陈佩珍. 海南岛蝴蝶[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社,1997, 45

    [3] 周尧. 中国蝴蝶分类与鉴定[M]. 郑州:河南科技出版社, 1998: 8

    [4] 武春生. 中国动物志昆虫纲第25卷:鳞翅目凤蝶科[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2001: 135~136

    [5] 易传辉,陈晓鸣,史军义,等. 光周期和温度对美凤蝶滞育诱导的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20 (2) : 188~192

    [6]

    Yoshio M, IshiiM. Rearing larvae of the great mormon butterfly,Papilio m em non L. (Lep idop tera: Pap ilionidae ) on artificial diet[J]. Jap J Ent, 1996, 64: 30~34
    [7]

    YoshioM, IshiiM. Geographical variation of pupal diapause in thegreatmormon butterfly. Papilio m em non L. (Lep idop tera: Pap ilionidae) in western Japan [J]. App l En t Zool, 1998, 33: 281~288
    [8]

    YoshioM, IshiiM. Photoperiod effects on pupal development in twotrop ical Papilio butterflies (Lep idop tera: Pap ilionidae) [J]. TransLep id Soc Japan, 2004, 55 (4) : 275~279
    [9]

    Ishii M. Diapause potential in trop ical pap ilionids (Lep idop tera:Pap iliodae) [J]. App l Ent Zool, 1987, 22: 114~115
    [10]

    SaundersD S, Steel C G H, Vafopoulou X, et al. Insect Clocks (3 rded. ) [M]. Oxford Elsevier, 2002: 1~551
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3353) PDF downloads(1444) Cited by()

Proportional views

Influence of the Photoper iod and Tempera ture on Larva l Developmenta lPer iods of the Grea t Mormon Butterfly Papilio m em non L innaeus

  • 1. Research Institute of Resource Insects, CAF

Abstract: The growth and development of larval of Papilio m em non were investigated under different photoperiodsand temperatures which could be controlled in the climate2box. The effects of photoperiod and temperature on larvaldevelopmental periods of Papilio m em non were very remarkable. At same temperature, larval developmental periodshad significant difference. At 20 ℃ and during daylength of 12~14 h, the larval developmental periodswere in thescope of 39. 3~48. 5 days, and the margin between of the longest and shortest periodswas 9. 2 days. At 25 ℃ andduring daylength of 11~15 h, larval developmental periodswere in the scope of 25. 4~36 days, and the margin between of the longest and shortest periodswas 10. 6 days. At 30 ℃ and during daylength of 11~15 h, larval developmental periodswere in the scope of 19. 6~29. 0 days, and the margin between of the longest and shortest periodswas 9. 6 days. At the same daylength, larval developmental periods became shorter when the temperature was rising. Under daylengthes of 12. 0, 12. 5, 13. 0, 13. 5 and 14. 0 h, the developmental threshold temperature of larvawere 13. 6, 13. 3, 9. 2, 12. 2, and 7. 5 ℃, the temperature effective thermal sum were 332. 7, 340. 5, 372. 1, 350. 9and 475. 4 degree-days. At certain extent, the developmental threshold temperature and temperature effective thermal sum of larva were affected by photoperiod.

Reference (10)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return