• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

The Early Growth Performance of Slash P ine×Caribbean P ineF1 Hybrids inMountain Area ofNorth Guangdong

  • Received Date: 2006-09-08
  • A tria lw as estab lished in 1999 in Lechang, Guangdong, wh ich inc luded 17 hybrid fam ilies o fP inus elliottii var. elliottii( PEE ) by P. caribaea var. hondurensis ( PCH ), 4 hybrid fam ilies o f PEE by P. caribaea var.bahm ensis( PCB ), 9 PEE open-po llina ted fam ilies( PEE ( op) ) and 1 PCH open-po llinated fam ily ( PCH ( op) ), aswell as 8 seedlots from pine seed orchards in Guangdong prov ince. These seed o rchardsw ere primary PEE seed o rchard( PEE ( p) ) in T aishan, first-generat ion PEE orchard ( PEE ( o) ) in Ta ishan, improved PEE seed o rchards( PEE ( i) ) in Ta ishan, pr imary P. caribaea var. caribaea seed orchard( PCC ( p) ) in Zhanjiang, primary PCB seedorchard( PCB ( p) ) in Zhan jiang, prim ary PCH seed orchard( PCH ( p) ) in Zhanjiang, primary P. taeda seed o rchard( PTA( p) ) in Y ingde, primary P. massoniana seed orchard( PMA ( p) ) in Ruyuan, respectively. The trialw as investigated for surv iva l rate, at the end of the plan ting year. And the he ight and diameter at breast height ( dbh) of indiv idual trees w ere measured at age 6. Then, preserv ing rate and ind iv idua l volumew ere ca lculated respective ly. The average surv ival rate o f 21 hybrid fam iliesw as 96. 2%, and preserv ing ratew as 87. 2%. Therew eremost sign ificant differences betw een all tested taxa for the ir increm en.t The order o f vo lume betw een taxa w as PEE PCH > PEE PCB > PCH ( p) > PMA ( p) > PCH ( op) > PEE ( op) > PEE ( i) > PEE ( p) > PCB ( p) > PCC ( p) >PEE ( o) > PTA ( p) . T en hybrid fam ilies w ere se lected in the tria l fo r the ir better g row th performance. The ir averagehe igh,t dbh and vo lume w ere 6. 35 m, 10. 85 cm and 0. 035 48 m3, respect ively. Their real average gains w ere59. 39%, 48. 76%, 134. 97%, 162. 23% and 172. 29% for volume, respective ly, compared to PMA ( p), PCH( p), PCB( p), PEE ( o) and PTA ( p).
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    N ik les D G. E xperien ce w ith som e P inus hybrid s in Queen sland,Au stralia[A] . In: P roc of Sym posium on H yb rid Breed ing and G enetics[C] . Noosa( QFR I/CRC-SPF), 2000: 27~ 43
    [2]

    N ik les D G. The f irst 50 years of the evolu tion of forestry tree improvem en t in Queen sland[A] . In: D ietersM J, M ath eson A C, N ik lesD G, et a l. Tree Im provem en t for Su stainab leT rop ical Forestry,Proc QFR I-IUFRO Conf[C] . Queen sland Forestry Research Inst itute, Gymp ie, 1996: 51~ 64
    [3] 叶亲柏. 湿地松-加勒比松(古巴变种)杂种F2 代生长表现[J] . 广东林业科技, 1990, 6( 3 ): 9~ 12

    [4] 湛江市林科所松树杂交育种课题组. 加勒比松与湿地松杂交育种试验[J] . 广东林业科技, 1994, 10 ( 4) : 23~ 27

    [5] 潘志刚, 管宁, 韦善华, 等. 我国南方杂交松生长和材性研究[J] .林业科学研究, 1999, 12( 4) : 398~ 402

    [6] 潘志刚, 陈贰. 国外松(加勒比松杂交松、湿地松、火炬松)扦插繁殖技术和采穗圃的营建[J] . 热带林业, 1999, 27 ( 4) : 159 ~ 161

    [7] 陈贰, 潘志刚, 黄凯. 杂种松试验研究初报[J] . 广东林业科技,2004, 20 ( 2) : 1~ 6

    [8] 李宪政, 赵奋成, 张应中, 等. 湿地松与加勒比松杂种第一代生长研究初报[J] . 广东林业科技, 1999, 15( 1 ): 1~ 7

    [9] 张应中, 赵奋成, 李宪政, 等. 湿地松扦插繁殖试验初报[J] . 广东林业科技, 1999, 15 ( 3) : 1~ 8

    [10] 赵奋成, 李宪政, 张应中, 等. 湿地松与洪都拉斯加勒比松的杂交效果分析[J] . 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 ( 4) : 409 ~ 415

    [11] 赵奋成, 张应中, 李福明, 等. 湿地松?? 加勒比松F1 杂种的扦插苗与实生苗早期生长比较[J] . 林业科学研究, 2005, 18 ( 3 ) :325~ 330

    [12] LY208- 1977, 中华人民共和国农林部颁发标准[S]

    [13] 茹正忠, 陈启基, 潘文, 等. 广东省湿地松二元材积表及林分蓄积量方程[J] . 广东林业科技, 1995, 11 ( 4) : 46~ 48

    [14] 黄少伟, 谢维辉. 实用SAS 编程与林业试验数据分析[M]. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2001: 36~ 63, 233~ 240

    [15] LY /T 1496 - 1999 (原ZB B 64007 - 88), 马尾松速生丰产林[S]

    [16] LY /T 1528-1999(原ZB B 64011-89 ), 湿地松速生丰产用材林[S]

    [17] DB 44 /T 113-2000, 火炬松工业用材林[S]

    [18] 江西省永丰县官山林场. 湿地松-加勒比松杂交种引种试验研究[J] . 江西林业科技, 1998( 2 ): 9~ 13

    [19] 朱志淞, 丁衍畴, 王观明. 加勒比松[M] . 广州: 广东科技出版社, 1986

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3490) PDF downloads(1746) Cited by()

Proportional views

The Early Growth Performance of Slash P ine×Caribbean P ineF1 Hybrids inMountain Area ofNorth Guangdong

  • 1. Guangdong Forestry Research In stitute, Guangzhou?? 510520, Gu angdong, China
  • 2. Guangdong Forestry R esearch In stitute, Guangzhou?? 510520, Gu angdong, china
  • 3. Lech ang Longshan Forestry Cen tre of Gu angdongProvince, Lechang?? 512200, Guangdong, china

Abstract: A tria lw as estab lished in 1999 in Lechang, Guangdong, wh ich inc luded 17 hybrid fam ilies o fP inus elliottii var. elliottii( PEE ) by P. caribaea var. hondurensis ( PCH ), 4 hybrid fam ilies o f PEE by P. caribaea var.bahm ensis( PCB ), 9 PEE open-po llina ted fam ilies( PEE ( op) ) and 1 PCH open-po llinated fam ily ( PCH ( op) ), aswell as 8 seedlots from pine seed orchards in Guangdong prov ince. These seed o rchardsw ere primary PEE seed o rchard( PEE ( p) ) in T aishan, first-generat ion PEE orchard ( PEE ( o) ) in Ta ishan, improved PEE seed o rchards( PEE ( i) ) in Ta ishan, pr imary P. caribaea var. caribaea seed orchard( PCC ( p) ) in Zhanjiang, primary PCB seedorchard( PCB ( p) ) in Zhan jiang, prim ary PCH seed orchard( PCH ( p) ) in Zhanjiang, primary P. taeda seed o rchard( PTA( p) ) in Y ingde, primary P. massoniana seed orchard( PMA ( p) ) in Ruyuan, respectively. The trialw as investigated for surv iva l rate, at the end of the plan ting year. And the he ight and diameter at breast height ( dbh) of indiv idual trees w ere measured at age 6. Then, preserv ing rate and ind iv idua l volumew ere ca lculated respective ly. The average surv ival rate o f 21 hybrid fam iliesw as 96. 2%, and preserv ing ratew as 87. 2%. Therew eremost sign ificant differences betw een all tested taxa for the ir increm en.t The order o f vo lume betw een taxa w as PEE PCH > PEE PCB > PCH ( p) > PMA ( p) > PCH ( op) > PEE ( op) > PEE ( i) > PEE ( p) > PCB ( p) > PCC ( p) >PEE ( o) > PTA ( p) . T en hybrid fam ilies w ere se lected in the tria l fo r the ir better g row th performance. The ir averagehe igh,t dbh and vo lume w ere 6. 35 m, 10. 85 cm and 0. 035 48 m3, respect ively. Their real average gains w ere59. 39%, 48. 76%, 134. 97%, 162. 23% and 172. 29% for volume, respective ly, compared to PMA ( p), PCH( p), PCB( p), PEE ( o) and PTA ( p).

Reference (19)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return