• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Ana lysis of the Genetic D iversity of Sweet Tha i Tamr indIntroduced from Tha iland Ba sed on RAPD Markers

  • Received Date: 2007-07-13
  • Random amp lified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was emp loyed to study the genetic variation and genetic relationship of 10 sweet Thai tamarind ( Tam arindus ind ica) cultivars introduced from Thailand. The RAPD analysisshowed that 34 of 52 amp lified bands (65. 38% ) were polymorphic within the species, while the mean percentageof polymorphic bandswithin cultivarswas 25. 96%. The number of alleles Ao , effective number of alleles Ae , Nei’sgene diversity H, and Shannon’s information index I for the species were 1. 653 8, 1. 199 9, 0. 137 1 and 012279, respectively, and for the cultivarswere on average 1. 259 6, 1. 164 7, 0. 094 6 and 0. 140 3, respectively. Thelargest p roportion of the total RAPD diversitywas found within, rather than among the cultivars (GST = 0. 163). Thegenetic distance between cultivars ranged from 0. 013 1 to 0. 124 4, and on average was 0. 047. An analysis of 10cultivars using UPGMA showed that the introduced sweet Thai tamarind cultivars could be divided into three group sby 0. 02 genetic distance, the first group included Zichupoton,Buangka,Barchan, Shampoo and Ziton cultivar, thesecond group included Sritong, Srichompo, Prakaythong and Sritongbao cultivar, and the third group included onlyBargeton cultivar. The basic data were p rovided for further development and imp rovement of the cultivars in thisstudy.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Chindap rasert T S. Tam arindus p lant genetic resources in Thailand[J]. Thai Journal of Agricultural Science, 1996, (1) : 1 - 11
    [2]

    Shankaracharya N N. Tamarind2Chemistry, Technology and Uses2Acritical app raisal [J]. Journal of Food Science & Technology,1998, 35 (3) : 193 - 208
    [3] 赵一鹤,杨时宇. 泰国甜角引种栽培试验[J]. 浙江林业科技,2005, 25 (1) : 53 - 55

    [4] 赵一鹤,杨时宇,李昆. 泰国甜角不同栽培品种果实营养成分分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2005, 14 (3) : 57 - 58

    [5]

    Murray M G, Thomp son W F. Rap id isolation of high2molecularweight p lant DNA [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1980, 8: 4321- 4325
    [6] 王 军,葛玉香,贺普超. RAPD标记在山葡萄种质鉴定中的应用[J]. 植物研究, 2004, 24 (4) : 473 - 476

    [7]

    Yeh F, Yang R C, Boyle T. POPGENE. A User2friendly Sharewarefor Population Genetic Analysis [M]. Molecular and BiotechnologyCenter. University ofAlberta, Edmonton, 1997
    [8]

    Excoffier L. Analysis ofMolecular Variance (AMOVA) Version 1.55 [M]. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory. University of Geneva,Switzerland, 1993
    [9] 张富民,葛 颂. 群体遗传学研究中的数据处理方法I. RAPD数据的AMOVA分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2002, 10 (4) : 438 - 444

    [10]

    Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distancefrom a small number of individuals [J]. Genetics, 1978, 89: 583- 590
    [11] 曹家树,申书兴. 园艺植物育种学[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2001

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3475) PDF downloads(1437) Cited by()

Proportional views

Ana lysis of the Genetic D iversity of Sweet Tha i Tamr indIntroduced from Tha iland Ba sed on RAPD Markers

  • 1. Research Institute of Resources Insects, CAF, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
  • 2. Faculty of Resources, Southwest Forestry College, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China

Abstract: Random amp lified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was emp loyed to study the genetic variation and genetic relationship of 10 sweet Thai tamarind ( Tam arindus ind ica) cultivars introduced from Thailand. The RAPD analysisshowed that 34 of 52 amp lified bands (65. 38% ) were polymorphic within the species, while the mean percentageof polymorphic bandswithin cultivarswas 25. 96%. The number of alleles Ao , effective number of alleles Ae , Nei’sgene diversity H, and Shannon’s information index I for the species were 1. 653 8, 1. 199 9, 0. 137 1 and 012279, respectively, and for the cultivarswere on average 1. 259 6, 1. 164 7, 0. 094 6 and 0. 140 3, respectively. Thelargest p roportion of the total RAPD diversitywas found within, rather than among the cultivars (GST = 0. 163). Thegenetic distance between cultivars ranged from 0. 013 1 to 0. 124 4, and on average was 0. 047. An analysis of 10cultivars using UPGMA showed that the introduced sweet Thai tamarind cultivars could be divided into three group sby 0. 02 genetic distance, the first group included Zichupoton,Buangka,Barchan, Shampoo and Ziton cultivar, thesecond group included Sritong, Srichompo, Prakaythong and Sritongbao cultivar, and the third group included onlyBargeton cultivar. The basic data were p rovided for further development and imp rovement of the cultivars in thisstudy.

Reference (11)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return