Eva lua tion Indica tor System and Eva lua tion Methodof Reg iona l Forest Resource Qua lity

DANG Pu-xing; HOU Xiao-wei; HUI Gang-ying; ZHAO Zhong-hua

Based on the material basis constituting and reflecting the forest resource quality, and by analyzing the major factors influencing and deciding the regional forest resource quality, the expert conference method and Delphimethod were used to establish and determine 5 main aspects describing regional forest resource quality and thematerialbasis, with p resent forest resource investigation measurements and research achievements obtained. The 5 main aspects are: forest distribution, forest structure, forest p roductivity, forest health and comp rehensive forest utilization,including 15 indicators and 19 classified indictors and 10 sub－classified indicators, which formed a 5－level evaluationsystem. Based on the resultsmentioned above, a new and objective regional forest resource quality comp rehensive evaluation method was put forward.

1. Northwest Institute of Forest Inventory, Planning and Design, State Forest Administration, Xi’an　710048, Shaanxi, China

2. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Tree Breedingand Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing　100091, China

Abstract: Based on the material basis constituting and reflecting the forest resource quality, and by analyzing the major factors influencing and deciding the regional forest resource quality, the expert conference method and Delphimethod were used to establish and determine 5 main aspects describing regional forest resource quality and thematerialbasis, with p resent forest resource investigation measurements and research achievements obtained. The 5 main aspects are: forest distribution, forest structure, forest p roductivity, forest health and comp rehensive forest utilization,including 15 indicators and 19 classified indictors and 10 sub－classified indicators, which formed a 5－level evaluationsystem. Based on the resultsmentioned above, a new and objective regional forest resource quality comp rehensive evaluation method was put forward.

HTML

Reference (26)

[1]	中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组. 中国可持续发展林业战略研究总论[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2002: 65 - 85
[2]	[R]. Rome: FAO, 2003
[3]	[R]. Rome: FAO, 2000
[4]	FAO. SustainableManagement of Trop ical Forests in CentralAfricainSearch of Excellence
[5]	[A]. Emerging issues inForest Policy
[6]	FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 20002MainReport2FRA2000
[7]	[C]. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1992: 60
[8]	John W B, Louise F. Property and forestry
[9]	蒋国洪,丁良东,林余益,等. 法国的森林质量评价管理[J]. 浙江林业, 2006 (10) : 40 - 43
[10]	联合国粮食及农业组织. 全球森林资源评估2000主报告[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2004
[11]	周洁敏. 森林资源质量评价方法探讨[J]. 中南林业调查规划,2001, 20 (2) : 5 - 8
[12]	杨　丽,李龙梅,刘俊芬. 等. 森林资源综合评价指标体系的探讨[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2006, 29 (1) : 59 - 61
[13]	窦万星,代均玉,孙继文. 森林资源评价浅探[J]. 防护林科技,2004 (4) : 81 - 82
[14]	崔世莹,苏喜友. 森林资源可持续性评价系统的研究[J]. 西部林业科学, 2004, 33 (2) : 89 - 93
[15]	李朝洪,许俊杰,于波涛. 中国森林资源可持续发展综合评价方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2002, 30 (2) : 73 - 76
[16]	李会芳,苏喜友. 森林资源评价浅议[J]. 林业调查规划, 2005,30 (2) : 62 - 66
[17]	石春娜,王立群. 我国森林资源质量评价体系研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2007, 20 (2) : 68 - 72
[18]	陈雪峰,黄国胜,夏宗朝,等. 全球森林资源评估方法与启示[J]. 林业资源管理, 2005 (4) : 24 - 29
[19]	《现代咨询方法与实务》编委会. 现代咨询方法与实务[M]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2003: 61 - 66
[20]	张建国. 林业经营综合效益评价研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 1994(4) : 70 - 73
[21]	中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组. 中国可持续发展林业战略研究战略卷[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2003: 24 - 27
[22]	中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组. 中国可持续发展林业战略研究森林问题卷[M]. 北京,中国林业出版社, 2003: 32 - 33
[23]	惠刚盈, von Gadow K. 森林空间结构量化分析方法[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 2003: 42 - 43
[24]	亢新刚. 森林资源经营管理[M]. 北京,中国林业出版社, 2004:156 - 157
[25]	苏喜友,王悦. 森林资源可持续发展的概念、原则和指标体系[J]. 林业资源管理, 1995 (特刊) : 8 - 18
[26]	国家林业局西北森林资源监测中心. 甘肃省森林资源连续清查第四次复查成果资料( 2005 年修订) [M]. 兰州: 甘肃省林业厅, 2005

Eva lua tion Indica tor System and Eva lua tion Methodof Reg iona l Forest Resource Qua lity

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views