• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Spec ies D iversity ofMa in Commun ities in Hot and Dry Va lley, Yuanmao County

  • Received Date: 2007-10-16
  • This paper studied the species diversity of natural and p lantation community in hot and dry valley ofYuanmao County, based on field investigation data and by using Patrick richness index ( S ) , Shannon-Wienerdiversity index (H) , Simp son dominance index (D ) ,Alatalo evenness index ( E) and Pielou evenness index. Theresults showed that: (1) the diversity of communities in hot and dry valleywas lower. The values of S, H,D respectivelywas 3. 923 - 19. 583, 0. 913 - 2. 000 and 0. 178 - 0. 510. The Patrick richness index of p lantation community wassharp ly lower than natural communities’. The Shannon2W iener diversity index of p lantation communities withdominance tree was higher than others. The Alatalo evenness index of p lantation communitywas sharp ly higher thannatural communities’. (2) The Patrick richness index of the communitieswere in the order of tree herb > shrub. (3) The content oforganic, N, P, Hydrolytic N of natural communitieswas higher than p lantation communitieswhich indicated that thenatural communities had good effect to imp roving soil fertility.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 谢晋阳,陈灵芝. 暖温带落叶阔叶林的物种多样性特征[J]. 生态学报, 1994 , 14 (4) : 337 - 344

    [2] 许再富, 朱 华, 王应祥, 等. 澜沧江下游/湄公河上游片断热带雨林物种多样性动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004 , 28 ( 5) :585 - 593

    [3] 项华均,安树青,王中生,等. 热带森林植物多样性及其维持机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2004 , 12 (2) : 290 - 300

    [4] 王克勤,郭逢春,贺庭荣,等. 金沙江干热河谷人工赤桉林群落结构[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2004, 2 (4) : 37 - 41, 47

    [5] 刘新龙,王瑞波,张燕平. 印楝人工林对植物多样性的影响[J].林业科学研究, 2004, 17 (2) : 147 - 153

    [6] 方海东,纪中华,杨艳鲜,等. 金沙江干热河谷新银合欢人工林物种多样性研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12 (1) : 135 - 137

    [7] 马姜明,李 昆,郑志新. 元谋干热河谷不同人工林林下物种多样性的研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2006, 28 (1) : 84 - 89

    [8] 杨振寅, 苏建荣, 罗 栋, 等. 干热河谷植被恢复研究进展与展望[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20 (4) : 563 - 568

    [9] 金振洲,欧晓昆. 元江、怒江、金沙江、澜沧江干热河谷植被[M].云南大学出版社,云南科技出版社, 2000

    [10] 北京气象中心资料室. 中国地面气候资料[M]. 北京:气象出版社, 1984

    [11] 张信宝,陈玉德. 云南元谋干热河谷区不同岩土类型荒山植被恢复研究[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 1997, 3 (1) : 13 - 18

    [12] 冶民生,关文彬,谭辉,等. 岷江干旱河谷灌丛α多样性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 26 (4) : 1123 - 1130

    [13] 欧晓昆,张志明,王崇云,等. 梅里雪山植被研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2006: 99 - 117

    [14] 马克平,黄建辉,于顺利,等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究Ⅱ. 丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J]. 生态学报,1995, 15 (3) : 268 - 277

    [15] 吴甘霖,黄敏毅,段仁燕,等. 不同强度旅游干扰对黄山松群落物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006 , 26 ( 12 ) :3924 - 3930

    [16] 金振洲,段昌群. 附录Ⅰ 植物生态学野外调查方法[M] / /杨持. 生态学实验与实习. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003:160 - 172

    [17]

    Tilman D, Downing J A. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands[J]. Nature, 1994, 367: 363 - 365
    [18]

    Tilman D. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity [J].Nature, 2000, 405: 208 - 211
    [19] 孙儒泳. 基础生态学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002:143 - 144

    [20] 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2002:47 - 54

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3325) PDF downloads(1502) Cited by()

Proportional views

Spec ies D iversity ofMa in Commun ities in Hot and Dry Va lley, Yuanmao County

  • 1. The Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
  • 2. Research Institute of Resource Insects, CAF, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
  • 3. The Forestry Administration of Yuanmao County, Yuanmao 651300, Yunnan, China

Abstract: This paper studied the species diversity of natural and p lantation community in hot and dry valley ofYuanmao County, based on field investigation data and by using Patrick richness index ( S ) , Shannon-Wienerdiversity index (H) , Simp son dominance index (D ) ,Alatalo evenness index ( E) and Pielou evenness index. Theresults showed that: (1) the diversity of communities in hot and dry valleywas lower. The values of S, H,D respectivelywas 3. 923 - 19. 583, 0. 913 - 2. 000 and 0. 178 - 0. 510. The Patrick richness index of p lantation community wassharp ly lower than natural communities’. The Shannon2W iener diversity index of p lantation communities withdominance tree was higher than others. The Alatalo evenness index of p lantation communitywas sharp ly higher thannatural communities’. (2) The Patrick richness index of the communitieswere in the order of tree herb > shrub. (3) The content oforganic, N, P, Hydrolytic N of natural communitieswas higher than p lantation communitieswhich indicated that thenatural communities had good effect to imp roving soil fertility.

Reference (20)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return