• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Effects of So ilMo isture on Photosyn thesis and Transpira tion Parametersof Am ygda lus davidiana Franch in Loess Hilly Pla teau

  • Received Date: 2007-04-02
  • Diurnal variations of leaf-air interface physiological parameters in leaves of three-year-old Am ygdalusdavidiana were studied under different soilmoisture conditions with C IRAS-2 portable photosynthesis system in theloess hilly p lateau. The results indicated that the diurnal variation p rocess of photosynthesis, transp iration and wateruse efficiency under different soilmoisture conditions took on different regulations. When soil relative water contentwas 57. 3% , 70. 1% , 80. 2% , the time that maximum disp lay was at 13: 00, 9: 00 and 15: 00, respectively, and the maximum values of photosynthetic rate were 10. 51, 12. 52, 9. 25 μmol·m-2·s-1 , respectively, the dailyaverage valueswere 6. 83 ±4. 92, 6. 40 ±4. 43 and 6. 32 ±3. 90 μmol·m-2·s-1 , respectively. In other soilmoisture conditions, all the photosynthetic rate followed a two-peak pattern; The style of diurnal variation curves oftransp iration rate was similar with that of photosynthetic rate, when soil relative water contents were 57. 3% ,70. 1% , 80.2% , the time thatmaximum disp laywas always at 13: 00, and the daily average values of transp irationrate were 1.91 ±1. 03, 3. 27 ±2. 09, 2. 90 ±1. 70μmol·mol- 1 , respectively; The maximum ofwater use efficiencybefore 13: 00 appeared at 7: 00 or 9: 00, but itwas very distinct after 13: 00. Analysis showed the dominating reasoncausing the photosynthetic rate fallwas stoma limitation when relative water contentwas over 57. 3%. In other soilmoisture conditions, stoma limitation was the dominating reason before 13: 00, while non2stoma limitation becamedominant after 13: 00. According to the connections between the photosynthetic rate, transp iration rate , water useefficiency and soil moisture, in loess hilly p lateau, the fitting soil relative water content maintaining Am ygdalusdavidiana natural growth was between 39. 7% and 57. 3%. At the same time, it should be p lanted in shady slope orsemi2shady slope in site design.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 程积民,万惠娥,王 静. 黄土丘陵区山桃灌木林地土壤水分过耗与调控恢复[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40 (5) : 691 - 696

    [2]

    WangQ C, Sun Z H, Zhang YD. Adap tive responses ofAcer ginnala, Pyrus ussuriensis and Prunu davidiana seedlings to soil moisturestress [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2003, 14 (4) : 280 - 284
    [3] 张源润,蒋 奇,蔡进军,等. 山桃沙棘混交林养分状况研究[J].水土保持通报, 2006, 26 (4) : 60 - 63

    [4] 韩蕊莲,侯庆春. 山桃山杏苗木耗水特性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 1996, 16 (6) : 92 - 94

    [5]

    Ohta S, Nishttant C, Yamamoto T. Chlorop last microsatellites inPrunus, Rosaceae [J]. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2005, 5 ( 4 ) :837 - 840
    [6] 王会肖,刘昌明. 作物光合、蒸腾与水分高效利用的试验研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14 (10) : 1632 - 1636

    [7] 王 强,张其德,卢从明,等. 超高产杂交稻不同生育期的光合色素含量、净光合速率和水分利用效率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002,26 (6) : 647 - 651

    [8] 王 磊,张 彤,丁圣彦. 干旱和复水对大豆光合生理生态特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26 (7) : 2073 - 2078

    [9] 廖建雄,王根轩. 干旱、CO2和温度升高对春小麦光合、蒸发蒸腾及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13 ( 5 ) :547 - 550

    [10]

    Long S P, Baker N R, Raines C A. Analyzing the responses ofphotosynthetic CO2 assimilation to long-erm elevation of atmospheric CO2 concentration [J]. Vegetation, 1993, 104 /105: 33 - 45
    [11] 杨朝翰,王艳云,周泽福,等. 黄土丘陵区杠柳叶片气体交换过程对土壤水分的响应[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 ( 2 ) :231 - 234

    [12]

    Hsiao T C. Plant responses to water stress [J]. Ann Rev PlantPhysiol, 1973, 24: 519 - 570
    [13] 山仑. 植物水分利用效率与半干旱地区农业节水[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1994, 30 (1) : 61 - 66

    [14]

    Hanks R J. Limitations to efficientwater use crop p roduction [J].American Society ofAgronomy Inc, 1983: 393 - 411
    [15] 山仑,徐 萌. 节水农业及其生理基础[J]. 应用生态学报,1991, 2 (1) : 70 - 76

    [16]

    Tearl D. Crop Water Relations [M]. NewYork: A Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1982
    [17]

    Eck H V. Effect ofwater defficits on yield, yield components, andwater use efficiency of irrigated corn [J]. Agron J, 2002, 78:1034 - 1040
    [18]

    AroeM, Virgin I, Ersson B. Photoinhibition of photosystem Ⅱ. In2active, p rotein damage and turnover [J]. Biochim Biophy Acta,1993 (1143) : 113
    [19]

    Xu D Q, Zhang Y Z, Zhang R X. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis[J]. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1992, 28 (4) : 237
    [20]

    Vu J C V, Allen L H, Bowes G. Drought stress and elevated CO2effects on soybean ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity andcanopy photosynthetic rates [J]. Plant Physiol, 1987, 83:573 - 578
    [21]

    Evans J R, Seemann J R. Differences between wheat geotypes inspecific activity of ribulose21, 5 - bisphosphate carbosylase and therelationship to photosynthesis [J]. Plant Physiol, 1984, 74:759 - 765
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(2983) PDF downloads(1366) Cited by()

Proportional views

Effects of So ilMo isture on Photosyn thesis and Transpira tion Parametersof Am ygda lus davidiana Franch in Loess Hilly Pla teau

  • 1. Research Institute of Forestry, CAF
  • 2.  Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China
  • 3. Chemingyu Forestry Centre, ForestryManagement Bureau of LuliangMountain, Luliang 033400, Shanxi, China

Abstract: Diurnal variations of leaf-air interface physiological parameters in leaves of three-year-old Am ygdalusdavidiana were studied under different soilmoisture conditions with C IRAS-2 portable photosynthesis system in theloess hilly p lateau. The results indicated that the diurnal variation p rocess of photosynthesis, transp iration and wateruse efficiency under different soilmoisture conditions took on different regulations. When soil relative water contentwas 57. 3% , 70. 1% , 80. 2% , the time that maximum disp lay was at 13: 00, 9: 00 and 15: 00, respectively, and the maximum values of photosynthetic rate were 10. 51, 12. 52, 9. 25 μmol·m-2·s-1 , respectively, the dailyaverage valueswere 6. 83 ±4. 92, 6. 40 ±4. 43 and 6. 32 ±3. 90 μmol·m-2·s-1 , respectively. In other soilmoisture conditions, all the photosynthetic rate followed a two-peak pattern; The style of diurnal variation curves oftransp iration rate was similar with that of photosynthetic rate, when soil relative water contents were 57. 3% ,70. 1% , 80.2% , the time thatmaximum disp laywas always at 13: 00, and the daily average values of transp irationrate were 1.91 ±1. 03, 3. 27 ±2. 09, 2. 90 ±1. 70μmol·mol- 1 , respectively; The maximum ofwater use efficiencybefore 13: 00 appeared at 7: 00 or 9: 00, but itwas very distinct after 13: 00. Analysis showed the dominating reasoncausing the photosynthetic rate fallwas stoma limitation when relative water contentwas over 57. 3%. In other soilmoisture conditions, stoma limitation was the dominating reason before 13: 00, while non2stoma limitation becamedominant after 13: 00. According to the connections between the photosynthetic rate, transp iration rate , water useefficiency and soil moisture, in loess hilly p lateau, the fitting soil relative water content maintaining Am ygdalusdavidiana natural growth was between 39. 7% and 57. 3%. At the same time, it should be p lanted in shady slope orsemi2shady slope in site design.

Reference (21)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return