• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Econom ic Va lue Assessment of Forest Spec ies D iversity Conserva tionin China Ba sed on the Shannon-W iener Index

  • Received Date: 2007-09-19
  • Lacking of objective and logical2inference method for assessing forest species diversity conservation valueis an international p roblem. Based on Shannon-Wiener index, a new method was recommended. It p rovided animpersonal standard for the assessment. Forest species diversity conservation value in China was analyzed using thedata of the sixth forest continuous inventory from 1999 to 2003 and Chinese forest ecosystem research net stations.Results showed Heilongjiang and Yunnan p rovinces came out top as for the total forest species diversity conservationvalue. Although Hainan was the highest one as for the average value of unit area, the total value of it was lowbecause of the smaller total area. Northwest China and north China were lack of forest resources. The 39 stand typeswere divided into five group s: high average value of unit area and low total value, high average value of unit areaand high total value, low average value of unit area and low total value, low average value of unit area and high totalvalue, medium average value of unit area and medium total value. The classification would advance the species conservation work. Compared with theW illingness to Pay (WTP) method, which was the most popular one today,the advantages of thismethod was its basing on the natural characteristics of forest ecosystems. The average value ofunit area and total value were all have their physical meanings. The results were more coincident with theunderstanding and more comparable.
  • 加载中
  • [D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院研究生院, 2007: 54

    [2] 马克平. 试论生物多样性的概念[J]. 生物多样性, 1993, 1 ( 1) :20 - 22

    [3] 袁建立,王 刚. 生物多样性与生态系统功能:内涵与外延[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版) , 2003, 39 (2) : 85 - 89

    [D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2004

    [D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2005

    [6] 李少宁. 江西森林生态系统服务功能研究

    [7] 薛达元. 长白山自然保护区生物多样性非使用价值评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 2000, 20 (2) : 141 - 145

    [R]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1998

    [9] 常进雄,鲁明中. 保护生物多样性的生态经济学研究[J]. 生态经济, 2001, (7) : 60 - 63

    [10] 阮 君. 福建省森林生物多样性及其价值估算[J]. 山东林业科技, 2006, (1) : 93 - 94

    [11] 赵同谦. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估研究

    [12] 靳 芳. 中国森林生态系统价值评估研究

    [13] 鲁绍伟, 靳 芳, 余新晓, 等. 中国森林生态系统保护土壤的价值评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2005, 3 (3) : 16 - 21

    [14] 中国生物多样性国情研究报告编写组. 中国生物多样性国情研究报告

    [15] 邱兴春,屠玉麟. 赤水桫椤保护区生物多样性的经济价值评估[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版) , 2005, 23 (1) : 23 - 27

    [16] 高云峰,曾贤刚,江文涛. 北京市山区森林资源非使用价值评价及其影响因素分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2005, (3) : 6 - 11

    [17] 贾小容, 苏志尧, 陈北光,等. 帽峰山森林生态系统服务非使用价值核算[J]. 广东林业科技, 2006, 22 (1) : 14 - 17, 21

    [18] 廖显春. 目前我国森林环境价值评价的难点及对策[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2001, 21 (2) : 96 - 99

    [19] 贺金生,陈伟烈. 陆地植物群落物种多样性的梯度变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 1997, 17 (1) : 91 - 99

    [20] 黄建辉,高贤明,马克平,等. 地带性森林群落物种多样性的比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 1997, 17 (6) : 611 - 618

    [21] 罗长维, 李 昆. 人工林物种多样性与害虫的控制[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42 (8) : 109 - 115

    [22] 阎海平,谭 笑,孙向阳,等. 北京西山人工林群落物种多样性的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2001, 23 (2) : 16 - 19

    [23] 张 颖. 中国森林生物多样性价值核算研究[J]. 林业经济,2001, (3) : 37 - 42

    [24]

    CharlesM P, Alwyn G H, et al. Valuation of an Amazonian rain2forest [J]. Nature, 1989, 339 (29) : 655 - 656
    [25] 李意德,陈步峰,周光益. 中国海南岛热带森林及其生物多样性保护研究[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2002

    [26] 高云峰. 北京山区森林资源价值评价及政策运用[J]. 中国农业经济论坛, 2005, 3 (2) : 193 - 210

    [27] 薛春泉,叶金盛,林俊钦,等. 广东省森林生态效益价值评估[J]. 广东林业科技, 2005, 21 (3) : 67 - 70

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3637) PDF downloads(1966) Cited by()

Proportional views

Econom ic Va lue Assessment of Forest Spec ies D iversity Conserva tionin China Ba sed on the Shannon-W iener Index

  • 1. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, CAF, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecologyand Environment , State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

Abstract: Lacking of objective and logical2inference method for assessing forest species diversity conservation valueis an international p roblem. Based on Shannon-Wiener index, a new method was recommended. It p rovided animpersonal standard for the assessment. Forest species diversity conservation value in China was analyzed using thedata of the sixth forest continuous inventory from 1999 to 2003 and Chinese forest ecosystem research net stations.Results showed Heilongjiang and Yunnan p rovinces came out top as for the total forest species diversity conservationvalue. Although Hainan was the highest one as for the average value of unit area, the total value of it was lowbecause of the smaller total area. Northwest China and north China were lack of forest resources. The 39 stand typeswere divided into five group s: high average value of unit area and low total value, high average value of unit areaand high total value, low average value of unit area and low total value, low average value of unit area and high totalvalue, medium average value of unit area and medium total value. The classification would advance the species conservation work. Compared with theW illingness to Pay (WTP) method, which was the most popular one today,the advantages of thismethod was its basing on the natural characteristics of forest ecosystems. The average value ofunit area and total value were all have their physical meanings. The results were more coincident with theunderstanding and more comparable.

Reference (27)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return