• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Effects of So ilWa ter Stress on the Photosynthesis Character istics andChlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters of Ce rasus hum ilis Seedling

  • Received Date: 2007-05-21
  • Both L i26400 photosynthesis system and OS12FL chlorophyll fluorometer were used to measure thephotosynthesis characteristic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Cerasus hum ilis p lant under soil waterstress. The result showed: (1) The average photosynthesis rate reached the maximum under the low water stress ,while that under the high soil water stress was the least. The stomatal conductance increased as a result of theincreasing of PAR ( Photosynthetically Active Radiation) under no soil water stress conditions and didn’t variateunder the mediums and high soil water stress conditions. Diurnal variation of photosynthesis rate p resented a two2peaks curve and showed obvious noon dep ression. The variation of net photosynthesis rates under different waterstress conditions are follows: 8. 447 ±0. 831, 6. 811 ±0. 690, 2. 658 ±0. 756, 1. 474 ±0. 469 μmol·m- 2 ·s- 1.Significant variations of Pn happened between the conditions of the former two and the later two,Diurnal variations ofCond, Tr, WUE under different soil water stress conditions were similar to the variations of Pn. ( 2 ) Thefluorescence parameter of Fo, NPQ increased with the increasing ofwater stress,while the Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo dereased.Itmeans that with the increasing of the water stress, the reaction center of PSIIwas destroyed or a non2reversibledeactivation occurred so that the photosynthesis was restrained. The photosynthetic apparatus of C. hum ilis wasp rotected by exhausting the extra light energy through heat dissipation. ( 3) WUE reached its maximum ( 1. 214 ±0. 112μmol·mmol-1 ) and the physiological parameters of photosynthesiswere op timized under low soilwater stresswith water contents from 21% - 24%.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Marshall B, Roberts J A. Leaf development and canopy growth[M]. England: Sheffield Academic Press, UK, 2000

    [C] / /Schulze E D, CaldwellM M. Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Berlin: Sp ringer-Verlag, 1994: 147 - 150
    [3] 许大全. 光合作用效率[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社,2002: 33

    [4]

    Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. The relationship between thequantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching ofchlorophyll fluorescence [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1989, 990:87 - 92
    [5]

    Schreiber U, Bilger W, Neubauer G. CholorphyⅡ fluorescence:New instruments for special app lications
    [6] 卢从明,张其德,匡廷云. 水分胁迫对小麦光系统Ⅱ的影响[J].植物学报, 1994, 36 (2) : 93 - 98

    [7] 陈贻竹,李晓萍,夏 丽,等. 叶绿素荧光技术在植物环境胁迫研究中的应用[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 1995, 3 (4) : 79 - 86

    [8] 王可玢,许春辉,赵福洪,等. 水分胁迫对小麦旗叶某些体内叶绿素a荧光参数的影响[J]. 生物物理学报, 1997, 13 ( 2 ) :273 - 278

    [9] 赵会杰,邹 琦,于振文. 叶绿素荧光分析技术在植物光合机理研究中的应用[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2000, 34 (3) : 248 - 251

    [10] 史胜青,袁玉欣,张金香,等. 不同水分胁迫方式对核桃苗叶绿素荧光动力学特性的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2003, 26 ( 2) :20 - 24

    [11] 史胜青,袁玉欣,杨敏生,等. 水分胁迫对4种苗木叶绿素荧光的光化学淬灭和非光化学淬灭的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(1) : 168 - 173

    [12] 何炎红,郭连生,田有亮. 白刺叶不同水分状况下光合速率及其叶绿素荧光特性的研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25 ( 11 ) :2226 - 2233

    [13] 巩擎柱,吕金印,徐炳成,等. 水分胁迫和种植方式对小麦叶绿素荧光参数及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2006, 36 (5) : 83 - 92

    [14] 綦 伟,谭 浩,翟 衡. 干旱胁迫对不同葡萄砧木光合特性和荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17 (5) : 835 - 838

    [15] 钱国珍,苏福才. 欧李的选种与人工栽培试验初报[J]. 中国果树, 1991 ( 2 ) : 29 - 30

    [16] 杜俊杰,杨怀义,曹 琴. 欧李生物学特性的研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报, 1992, 12 (4) : 311 - 314

    [17] 马建军,张立彬. 野生欧李生长期矿质营养元素含量的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2004, 31 (2) : 165 - 168

    [18]

    BilgerW, Bjêrkman O. Role of the xanthophyⅡ cycle in photop rotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbancechanges, fluorescence and photosynthesis in Hedra canariensis[J].Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25: 173 - 185
    [19]

    Powles C B. Photo inhibition induced by visible light [J]. AnnuRev Plant Physiol, 1984, 4 (35) : 15 - 44
    [20]

    DemmigB, Bjêrkman O. Comparison of the effect of excessive lighton chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield ofO- evolutionof leaves of higher p lants[J]. Planta, 1987, 171: 171 - 184
    [21] 许大全,张玉全. 植物光合作用的光抑制[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1992, 28 (4) : 237 - 243

    [22] 张守仁. 叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论[J]. 植物学通报, 1999, 16 (4) : 444 - 448

    [23]

    Gilmore A M, Yamamoto H Y. Zeaxanthin formation and energy dependent fluorescence quenching in pea chlorop lasts[J]. Plant Physio1, 1996, 96: 636 - 643
    [24]

    Harrison R D, Daniell JW, Cheshire J R. Net photosynthesis andconductance of peach seedling and cutting responses to changes insoil water potential[J]. Amer Soc Hort Soc, 1989, 114: 986 - 990
    [25] 阿布力米提·买买提明,张俊佩,裴 东. 不同类型核桃的光合和蒸腾性能对土壤水分胁迫响应的研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2004, 27 (4) : 26 - 30

    [26] 赵昌琼,芦站根,庞永珍,等. 土壤水分胁迫对曼地亚红豆杉光合特性的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 28(1) : 127 - 129

    [27]

    Peterson R B, Aivak M N, Walker D A. Relationship betweensteady-state fluorescence yield and photosynthetic efficiency in sp inach leaf issue[J]. Pla Physio1, 1998, 88: 158 - 163
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3118) PDF downloads(1554) Cited by()

Proportional views

Effects of So ilWa ter Stress on the Photosynthesis Character istics andChlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters of Ce rasus hum ilis Seedling

  • 1. Research Institute of Forestry, CAF

Abstract: Both L i26400 photosynthesis system and OS12FL chlorophyll fluorometer were used to measure thephotosynthesis characteristic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Cerasus hum ilis p lant under soil waterstress. The result showed: (1) The average photosynthesis rate reached the maximum under the low water stress ,while that under the high soil water stress was the least. The stomatal conductance increased as a result of theincreasing of PAR ( Photosynthetically Active Radiation) under no soil water stress conditions and didn’t variateunder the mediums and high soil water stress conditions. Diurnal variation of photosynthesis rate p resented a two2peaks curve and showed obvious noon dep ression. The variation of net photosynthesis rates under different waterstress conditions are follows: 8. 447 ±0. 831, 6. 811 ±0. 690, 2. 658 ±0. 756, 1. 474 ±0. 469 μmol·m- 2 ·s- 1.Significant variations of Pn happened between the conditions of the former two and the later two,Diurnal variations ofCond, Tr, WUE under different soil water stress conditions were similar to the variations of Pn. ( 2 ) Thefluorescence parameter of Fo, NPQ increased with the increasing ofwater stress,while the Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo dereased.Itmeans that with the increasing of the water stress, the reaction center of PSIIwas destroyed or a non2reversibledeactivation occurred so that the photosynthesis was restrained. The photosynthetic apparatus of C. hum ilis wasp rotected by exhausting the extra light energy through heat dissipation. ( 3) WUE reached its maximum ( 1. 214 ±0. 112μmol·mmol-1 ) and the physiological parameters of photosynthesiswere op timized under low soilwater stresswith water contents from 21% - 24%.

Reference (27)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return