• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Interspec ies Connection of Dom inant Tree Spec ies inCepha lotaxus fortune i Commun ities

  • Received Date: 2007-11-01
  • Based on the samp le p lot investigation method, the tree species of Cephalotaxus fortunei community wereinvestigated in DagangshanMountain, The main tree species of Cephalotaxus fortunei communitywere ascertained bycomputing the Importance Value of tree species. The overall association of the dominant tree species , theinterspecific association of dominant tree species and interspecific covariation of the dominant tree species werestudied. The result showed that the overall association of the dominant tree species was positive. The pairs ofpositive interspecific association were as following: Eu rya loquaiana2Cornus m acrophylla, M ach ilus thunbergiiCunningham ia lanceolata; The interspecific association ofL ithoca rpus glabra-Cunn ingham ia lanceola ta was negative.The interspecific associations of Cephalotaxus fortunei with other specieswere not significant. There were 7 pairs ofspecies showing a significant interspecific covariation, 6 pairs were positive interspecific covariation, They were:Eurya loquaiana-Rhododendron latoucheae, Eu rya loquaiana-Cornus m acrophylla, Eurya loquaiana-Cepha lotaxusfortunei, Cornus m acrophylla-Phoebe sheareri, Mach ilus thunbergii-Cunningham ia lanceolata, and M achilusthunbergii-A lniphyllum fortunei. Only the interspecific covariation of Rhododendron la toucheae with Eu rya japon icawas negative. The reason for positive interspecific covariation was that these species used the resource similarly.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 胡玉熹. 三尖杉生物学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1999

    [2] 郭文杰,鲁雪华,林 勇. 三尖杉的资源利用与开发[J]. 亚热带植物通讯, 1998, 27 (1) : 23 - 26

    [3] 李述文,孙函丽,吕腓理,等. 三尖杉碱酯类化合物的合成及其抗肿瘤活性[J]. 药学学报, 1981 (11) : 821 - 826

    [4] 吕玉华. 三尖杉的育苗技术[J]. 云南林业科技, 2000 (2) : 12 - 14

    [5] 司马永康,蒋 宏,方 波,等. 珍贵药用植物三尖杉种子大小的变异[J]. 云南林业科技, 2002 (4) : 30 - 32

    [6] 周秀佳,胡之璧,黄炼栋,等. 中国三尖杉属植物资源研究[J].湖北农学院学报, 1997, 17 (2) : 100 - 103

    [7] 王 兵,李海静,郭泉水,等. 江西大岗山森林生物多样性研究[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2005: 24 - 64

    [8] 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2001: 45- 46

    [9]

    Schluter D. A variance test for detecting species associations, withsome examp le app lications[J]. Ecology, 1984 (3) : 998 - 1005
    [10] 杜荣骞. 生物统计学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 1999

    [11] GW Cox. 普通生态学实验手册[M]. 蒋有绪译. 北京:科学出版社, 1979

    [12] 王伯荪,彭少麟. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林种间联结测定技术研究I种间联结测式的探讨与修订[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊,1985, 9 (4) : 274 - 285

    [13] 郭志华,卓正大. 庐山常绿阔叶、落叶阔叶混交林乔木种群种间联结性研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1997, 21 (5) : 424 - 432

    [14] Whittaker R H. 植物群落排序[M]. 王伯荪译. 北京:科学出版社, 1986

    [15]

    Hurlbert S H. A coefficient of interspecific association[J]. Ecology,1969, 50: 1 - 9
    [16]

    Ludwin J A, Reynods J F. Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methodsand Computing [M]. New York: A Wiley— Interscience Publication, 1988: 145 - 155
    [17] 李建民,谢 芳,陈存及,等. 光皮桦天然林群落优势种群的种间联结性研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12 (2) : 168 - 170

    [18] 张倩媚,陈北光,周国逸. 鼎湖山主要林型优势树种种间联结性的计算方法研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2006, 27 (1) : 79 - 83

    [19] 周先叶,王伯荪,李鸣光,等. 黑石顶自然保护区森林次生演替过程中群落主要种的种间协变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(3) : 367 - 371

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3455) PDF downloads(1493) Cited by()

Proportional views

Interspec ies Connection of Dom inant Tree Spec ies inCepha lotaxus fortune i Commun ities

  • 1. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, CAF
  • 2.  Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment,State Forestry Administration,Beijing 100091, China

Abstract: Based on the samp le p lot investigation method, the tree species of Cephalotaxus fortunei community wereinvestigated in DagangshanMountain, The main tree species of Cephalotaxus fortunei communitywere ascertained bycomputing the Importance Value of tree species. The overall association of the dominant tree species , theinterspecific association of dominant tree species and interspecific covariation of the dominant tree species werestudied. The result showed that the overall association of the dominant tree species was positive. The pairs ofpositive interspecific association were as following: Eu rya loquaiana2Cornus m acrophylla, M ach ilus thunbergiiCunningham ia lanceolata; The interspecific association ofL ithoca rpus glabra-Cunn ingham ia lanceola ta was negative.The interspecific associations of Cephalotaxus fortunei with other specieswere not significant. There were 7 pairs ofspecies showing a significant interspecific covariation, 6 pairs were positive interspecific covariation, They were:Eurya loquaiana-Rhododendron latoucheae, Eu rya loquaiana-Cornus m acrophylla, Eurya loquaiana-Cepha lotaxusfortunei, Cornus m acrophylla-Phoebe sheareri, Mach ilus thunbergii-Cunningham ia lanceolata, and M achilusthunbergii-A lniphyllum fortunei. Only the interspecific covariation of Rhododendron la toucheae with Eu rya japon icawas negative. The reason for positive interspecific covariation was that these species used the resource similarly.

Reference (19)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return