Flor istic Ana lysis of Seed Plan ts in Kuocangsan Na tureReserve of Zhejiang Prov ince

PENG Jia-long; SHI Xiao-hua; ZHANG Ru-zhong

Itwas known that there were 616 species of seed p lants in Kuocangshan Nature Reserve, which belongedto 336 genera of 115 families. Among them, there were 8 species of Gymnospermae belonging to 7 genera of 5families, 608 species of Angiospermae belonging to 329 genera of 110 families. There were 15 families whichconsisted of more than 10 species. 323 genera were monotyp ic or oligotyp ic genera. The geographical floristicalcomponents in Kuocangshan Nature Reserve were very comp lex and these species p layed important roles in seedp lant flora. On the distribution type of families, Pantrop ic type was the dominant ( 36 families) , followed byCosmopolitan type (34 families) , accounting for 31. 30% and 29. 57% of the total families respectively. On thedistribution types of genera and species, Pantrop ic distribution type was the dominant, followed by north temperatedistribution type, which showed the characteristic of transitionality. Endemic characteristics of family, genus andspecieswere not obvious.

1. Xianju Forestry Bureau of Zhejiang Province, Xianju　317300, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2007-11-26

Abstract: Itwas known that there were 616 species of seed p lants in Kuocangshan Nature Reserve, which belongedto 336 genera of 115 families. Among them, there were 8 species of Gymnospermae belonging to 7 genera of 5families, 608 species of Angiospermae belonging to 329 genera of 110 families. There were 15 families whichconsisted of more than 10 species. 323 genera were monotyp ic or oligotyp ic genera. The geographical floristicalcomponents in Kuocangshan Nature Reserve were very comp lex and these species p layed important roles in seedp lant flora. On the distribution type of families, Pantrop ic type was the dominant ( 36 families) , followed byCosmopolitan type (34 families) , accounting for 31. 30% and 29. 57% of the total families respectively. On thedistribution types of genera and species, Pantrop ic distribution type was the dominant, followed by north temperatedistribution type, which showed the characteristic of transitionality. Endemic characteristics of family, genus andspecieswere not obvious.

HTML

Reference (21)

[1]	吴征镒,王荷生. 中国自然地理———植物地理(上册) [M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1983
[2]	王祥福,郭泉水,刘正宇,等. 崖柏群落种子植物区系组成分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20 (6) : 755 - 762
[3]	吴征镒. 中国种子植物属的分布区类型[J]. 云南植物研究, 1991(增刊Ⅳ) : 1 - 139
[4]	吴征镒,周浙昆,李德铢. 世界种子植物科的分布区类型系统[J]. 云南植物研究, 2003, 25 (3) : 245 - 257
[5]	李锡文. 中国种子植物区系统计分析[J]. 云南植物研究, 1996,18 (4) : 363 - 384
[6]	上官铁梁,张　峰,邱富财. 芦芽山自然保护区种子植物区系地理成分分析[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 1999, 17 (4) : 323 - 331
[7]	朱　华. 中国植物区系研究文献中存在的几个问题[J]. 云南植物研究, 2007, 29 (5) : 489 - 491
[8]	张秦伟. 秦岭种子植物区系分区研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究,2002, 20 (1) : 21 - 32
[9]	张建新. 浙江丽水木本植物区系的研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究,2005, 23 (5) : 455 - 460
[10]	茹文明,赵安芳,张桂萍,等. 山西南方红豆杉分布区种子植物区系分析[J]. 山西大学学报, 2006, 29 (4) : 440 - 444
[11]	陈卫娟,王希华,闫恩荣. 浙江天童及周边地区常绿阔叶林退化群落的植物区系分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报, 2006, 11(6) : 98 - 124
[12]	王昌腾. 浙江省箬寮岘自然保护区木本植物区系研究[J]. 云南植物研究, 2006, 28 (5) : 453 - 460
[13]	金孝锋,丁炳扬,郑朝宗,等. 浙江百山祖自然保护区种子植物区系分析[J]. 云南植物研究, 2004, 26 (6) : 605 - 618
[14]	叶仲节,柴锡周. 浙江林业土壤[M]. 杭州:浙江科学技术出版社, 1986: 77 - 103
[15]	浙江植物志编辑委员会. 浙江植物志( 1～7卷) [M]. 杭州:浙江科学技术出版社, 1989—1993
[16]	郑朝宗. 浙江植物区系的特点[J]. 杭州大学学报, 1987, 14 (3) :348 - 361
[17]	金则新,朱文文. 浙江省仙居县种子植物区系研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2007, 22 (1) : 38 - 42
[18]	郑朝宗. 天目山自然保护区自然资源综合考察报告[M]. 杭州:浙江科学技术出版社, 1992: 89 - 128
[19]	丁炳扬,曾汉元,方　腾,等. 浙江省古田山自然保护区蕨类植物区系的研究[J]. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2001, 27(4) : 370 - 374
[20]	陈析丰,陈贤兴,刘　鹏,等. 浙江大罗山种子植物区系的初步研究[J]. 广西植物, 2006, 26 (3) : 273 - 277
[21]	中国科学院《中国自然地理》编委会. 植物地理(上册) [M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1985

Flor istic Ana lysis of Seed Plan ts in Kuocangsan Na tureReserve of Zhejiang Prov ince

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views