Research Progress in the Effects of Non-host Volatiles to Conifer-inhabiting Bark Beetles

CUI Li-xian; ZHANG Zhen; HUANG Da-zhuang

Volume 23 Issue 6

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2010 > 23(6): 895-904

Citation:

Research Progress in the Effects of Non-host Volatiles to Conifer-inhabiting Bark Beetles

1.
College of Forestry, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071000, Hebei,China
2.
Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Protection, State Forestry Administration, Beijing
3.
Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Protection, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

Received Date: 2008-11-08

Abstract

Conifer bark beetles are able not only to recognize, but also to avoid non-host habitats, non-host species and unsuitable hosts by semiochemicals. Green leaf volatiles (GLV), especially C6-alcohols from the leaves and C8-alcohols from bark of non-host angiosperm trees may represent non-host odor signals, and play important roles in the host searching process of conifer-inhabiting bark beetle. The study bases of GLV and avoidance of non-host volatiles, the factors affecting tree volatile emissions, collection, analysis and bioassay methods of non-host volatiles, ecological and evolutionary significance of non-host volatiles were summarized. The bark beetle searching for suitable host was not the result of a single factor but multiple signals. Non-host volatiles could be used in the management of conifer-inhabiting bark beetle.
- conifer-inhabiting bark beetles,
- host selection, non-host volatiles,
- green leaf volatiles,

References

[1]	Wood S L. The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) of North and Central America: A Taxonomic Monograph .Great Basin Natural Memograph, Brigham Young University Provo, Utah, 1982, no 6
[2]	Kelley S T, Farrel B D. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae) [J]. Evolution, 1998, 52:1731-1743
[3]	Sequeira A S, Normark B B, Farrell B D. Evolutionary assembly of the conifer fauna: distinguishing ancient from recent associations in bark beetles . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B), 2000, 267:2359-2366
[4]	Dethier V G. Mechanism of host-plant recognition [J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1982, 31:49-56
[5]	Visser J H. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1986, 31:121-144
[6]	Dobson H E M. Floral volatiles in insect biology. Insect Plant Interactions[M], vol. 5.Bernays E A. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida, USA,1994: 47-81
[7]	Bernays E A. Plant-insect interactions-a synthesis . Abstract Book I. XXI-International Congress of Entomology. August. International Congress of Entomology, Brazil, 2000: Vlll-Xlll.20-26
[8]	Atkins M D. Behavioral variation among scolytids in relation to their habitat [J]. Canadian Entomologist, 1966, 98:285-288
[9]	Raffa K F, Benyman A A. Interacting selective pressures in conifer bark beetle systems: a basis for reciprocal adaptations[J] American Naturalist, 1987, 129: 234-262
[10]	Byers J A. Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles[M]// Carde R T, Bell W J. Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. Chapman and Hall, New Yark, 1995:154-213
[11]	Borden J H. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles [M]// Carde R T, Minks A K. Pheromone Research:New Directions,1997:421-438
[12]	Schlyter F, Birgersson Cz. Forest Beetles[M]// Hardic R J,Minks A. Pheromones of Non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK,1999: 113-148
[13]	Petersonnjk H E. Squash legal and ulartrichome volatile: identification and influence on behavior of female pickleworm moth Diaphania nitidalis[J]. Chemical Ecology, 1994, 20:2099-2109.
[14]	Paulwp J. Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores[J]. Plant Physiology, 1999,121:325-331
[15]	Muller T L. Volatile organic compounds emitted from beech leaves[J]. Phytochemistry, 1996,43:759-762
[16]	杜家纬.植物-昆虫间的化学通讯及其行为控制[J]. 植物生理学报,2001,27(3):193-200
[17]	Boren J H, Bennett R B, Acontinuously recording flight mile for investigating the effects of volatile substance on the flight of the red insect[J]. Ecolentomol,1969, 62(4):782-785
[18]	Byers J A. An encounter rate model of bark beetle populations searching at random for susceptible host trees[J]. Ecological Model,1996, 91:57-66
[19]	Zhang Q H. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer bark beetles . Ph.D. Thesis (Agraria 264). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Alnarp, Sweden, 2001
[20]	陈辉,李宗波.植物挥发性化合物在小蠹虫寄主选择中的作用[J]. 福建林学院学报,2006,26(1):87-91
[21]	Zhang Q H, Birgerss G., Zhu J W, et al.. Leaf volatiles from nonhost deciduous trees:variation by tree species, season,and temperature and electrophysiological activity in Ips typographus[J].Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1999a, 25(8):1923-1943
[22]	Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Anderson P. Green leaf volatiles interrupt pheromone response of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1999b, 25(12):2847-2861
[23]	Wilson L M, Borden J H, Gries R, et al.. Green leaf volatiles as antiaggregants for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1996, 22: 1861-1875
[24]	Schlyter F, Zhang Q H, Anderson P, et al.. Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of pine shoot beetles, Tomicus piniperda and T. minor (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), to non-host leaf and bark volatiles[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 2000, 132: 965-98
[25]	Wood D L.The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles[J]. Annual Review of Entomology,1982, 27: 411-446
[26]	Jactel H, van Halder I, Menassieu P, et al.. Non-host volatiles disrupt the response of the stenographer bark beetle Ips sexdentatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromone baited traps and maritime pine log[J].Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 2001, 6:197-207
[27]	Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Birgersson G. Bark volatiles from non-host deciduous trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus(L.) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis[J]. Chemoecology, 2000, 10: 69-80
[28]	ZHANG Long-wa, Nancy E G, SUN Jiang-hua. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Dendroctonus valens to non-host volatiles[J]. Annual Forest Science, 2007, 64: 267-273
[29]	Guerrero A, Feixas J, Pajares J, et al.. Semiochemically induced inhibition of behaviour of Tomicus destruens(Woll) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1997, 84: 155-157
[30]	Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, et al.. Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles found in the bark of nonhost angiosperms[J]. Journal of chemical ecology, 1999, 25: 805-816
[31]	Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, et al.. A survey of antennal responses by five species of conniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees[J]. Chemoecology, 2000a, 10: 103-113
[32]	Morewood W D, Simmonds K E, Gries R, et al.. Disruption by conophthotin of the kairomone response of sawyer beetles to bark beetle pheromones[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29(9): 2115-2129
[33]	Byers J A. Attraction of bark beetles,Tomicus piniperda,Hylurgops palliates,and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1992, 18(12): 2385-2402
[34]	Zhang Q H, Liu G T, Schlyter F, et al.. Olfactory response of Ips duplicatus to nonhost leaf and bark volatiles in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2001, 27: 955-1009
[35]	Ross D W, Datermen G E. Efficacy of antiaggregation pheromone for reducing douglas-fir beetle infestation in high risk stands[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1995,127:805-811
[36]	Wood D L. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and and allomones in the host selection and colonization of bark beetles[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1982, 27:411-446
[37]	杨群芳,周祖基,李庆.植物精油对云南松纵坑切梢小蠹的驱避活性研究[J].西南农业大学学报, 2003, 25(4): 357-3591
[38]	Gries G. Prospects of new semiochemicals and technologies. Application of Semiochemical for Management of Bark Beetle infestations //Salom S M,Hobson K R. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report. INT-GTR-318,1995:44-47
[39]	Kohnle U. Host and non-host odour signals governing host selection by the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda and the spruce bark beetle, Hylurgops palliatus (Col., Scolytidae) [J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2004, 128(9-10):588-592
[40]	Dickens J C, Billings R F, Payne T L. Green leaf volatiles interrupt aggregation pheromone response in bark beetles infecting pines[J]. Experientia, 1992, 48: 523-524
[41]	Byers J A, Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, et al.. Volatiles from non-host birch tree inhabit pheromone response in spruce bark beetles[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1998, 85: 557-561
[42]	Groot P D E. Green leaf volatiles inhabit response of red pine cone beetle Conophthorus resinosae(Coleopter, Scolytide) to a sex pheromone[J]. Natutwissenschaften,1999, 86(2): 81-85
[43]	Zhang Q H.Interruption of aggregation pheromones in Ips typographus (L.) (Col. Scolytidae) by non-host bark volatiles[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entommology, 2003, 5(2): 142-152.
[44]	Fettig C J, Borys R R, Dabney C P, et al.. Disruption of red turpentine attraction to baited traps by the addition of California five spined ips pheromone components[J]. Canadian Entomology, 2005, 137:748-752
[45]	Teranishi R, Kint S. Bioactive volatile compounds from plants: an overview [M]//Teranishi R. Buttery R G ,Sugisawa H. Bioactive Volatile Compounds from Plants. American Chemical Society, Washington,D.C., 1993: 1-5
[46]	Robinson T. The organic Constituents of Higher Plants[M], Cordus Press, North Amherst, MA, 1983
[47]	Metcalf R L, Metcalf E R. Plant Kairomones in Insect Ecology and Control[M]. Chapman &Hall, Academic Press, New York, 1992
[48]	Francke W, Bartels J, Meyer H, et al.. Semiochemicals from bark beetles:new results,remarks,and reflections[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1995, 21:1043-1063
[49]	Borden J H, Wilson I M, Gries R, et al.. Volatiles from the bark of trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx.(Salicaceae) disrupt secondary attraction by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera:Scolytide)[J]. Chemoecology, 1998, 8: 69-75
[50]	Zhang Q H, Tollasch T, Schlyter F, et al.. Enantiospecific antennal response by bark beetle (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to the spiroacetal E-conophthorin[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2002, 28:1839-1852
[51]	Tollsten L, Knudsen J T. Floral scent in deciduous Salix (Salicaceae)-acue determining the pollination system? [J] Plant Systematics and Evolution, 1992, 82: 229-237
[52]	Millar J G,Haynes K F. Methods in Chemical Ecology:Chemical Methods[M]. Kluwer. Norwel, 1998
[53]	Huber D P W, Borden, J H, Stastny M. Response of the pine engraver, Ips pini(Say) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), to conophthorin and other angiosperm, bark volatiles in the avoidance of non-hosts[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2001, 3:225-232
[54]	Payne T L. Pheromone perception. [M] // Birch M C. Pheromones. Elsevier-North Holland Publishers Amsterdam,1974: 31-61
[55]	Arn H, Stadler E, Rauscher S. The electroantennographic detector-a selective and sensitive tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones[J]. Zeitschrift fitr Naturforschung, 1975, 30c:722-725
[56]	Schroder L M. Olfactory recognition of nonhost aspen and birch by conifer bark beetle Tomicus pinipenta and Hylurgops palliates[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1992,18:1583-1593
[57]	Ross D W, Datermen G E. Efficacy of antiaggregation pheromone for reducing douglas-fir beetle infestation in high risk stands[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1995, 127:805-811
[58]	Leather S R, Watt A F. Insest-induced chemical changes in yang lodgpole pine(Pinus contorta); the effect of previous defoliation on oviposition, growth and survival of the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea[J]. Ecological Entomology, 1987, 12: 275-281
[59]	Byers J A. Effect of mating on terminating aggregation during host colonization in the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus[J] Journal of Chemical Ecology,1981a,7(1): 1135-1146
[60]	杨群芳,周祖基,李庆. 云南松纵坑切梢小蠹驱避作用测定方法初探[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2003,21(3):226-229
[61]	于诚铭,张庆贺. 落叶松八齿小蠹聚集信息素生物活性及分泌规律[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1988,16(4):1-7
[62]	殷彩霞, 高竹林, 吕军, 等. 纵坑切梢小蠹对云南松枝梢提取物趋性测试[J]. 昆虫知识,2002, 39(5):384-386
[63]	Ting D T, Turner D P, Weber J A. Factors controlling the emissions of monoterpenes and other volatile organic compounds [M]// Sharkey T D, Holland E A, Mooney H A. Trace Gas Emissions by Plants. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego,1991:93-119
[64]	Charron C S, Cantiliffe D J, Heath R R. Volatile emissions from plants[J]. Horticultural Review, 1995, 17:43-72
[65]	Guenther A B, Monson R K, Fall R. Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: observations with eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm development[J]. Journal of Guophysical Research, 1991, 96: 10799-10808
[66]	Dement W A, Tyson B J, Mooney H A. Mechanism of monoterpene volatilization in Salvia mellifera[J]. Phytochemistry, 1975, 14:2555-2557
[67]	Kamiysma K, Takai T, Yamanaka Y. Correlation between volatile substances released from plants and meteorological conditions . White E T, Hetherington P, Thiele B R. Proceedings from the International Clean Air Conferece, Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan,1978:365-372
[68]	Tingey D T, Manning M, Ratsch H C, et al.. Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine[J]. Plant Physiology, 1980, 65:797-801
[69]	Yukouchi Y, Ambe Y. Factors affecting the emission of monoterpenes from red pine (Pinus densiflora)[J]. Plant Physiology, 1984, 75:1009-1012
[70]	Staudt M, Seufert G. Light-dependent emission of monoterpenes by holm oak (Quercus ilex L.)[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1995, 82:89-92
[71]	Gleizes M, Pauly G, Bernard-Dagan C, et al.. Effects of light on terpene hydrocarbon synthesis in pinus pinaster[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1980, 50:16-20
[72]	Hall G D, Langenheim J H. Temporal changes in the leaf monoterpenes of Sequoia sempervirens[J]. Biochemical systematics and Ecology, 1986, 14:61-69
[73]	Isidorov V A, Zenkevich I G, Ioffe B V. Volatile organic compounds in the Atmosphere of forests[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1985, 19:1-8
[74]	Kimmerer T W, Kozlowski T T. Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde, and ethanol production by plants under stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 1982, 69:840-847
[75]	Pare P W, Tumlinson J H. Plant volatile signals in response to herbivore feeding[J]. Florida Entomologist, 1996, 79:93-103
[76]	Winer A M, Arey J, Atkinson R, et al.. Emission rates of organics from vegetation in Californias central valley[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1992, 26A:2647-2659
[77]	Zhang Q H, Schlyter F. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2004, 6:1-19
[78]	Vite J P, Baader E. Present and future use of semiochemical in pest management of bark beetle[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1990, 16: 3031-3041
[79]	Byers J A, Zhang Q H, Birgersson G. Strategies of a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in an olfactory landscape[J]. Natururwissenscenschaften, 2000, 87:503-507
[80]	Erbilgin N, Raffa K F. Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetle to their aggregation pheromones[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2000, 26:2527-2548
[81]	Huber D P W, Borden J H. Protection of lodgepole pines from mass attack by mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, with nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001b, 99:131-141
[82]	Borden J H, Chong L J, Earle T J, et al.. Protection of logepole pine from attack by the mountain pine beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae(Coleoptera:Scolytide) using high dose of verbenone in combination with nonhost bark volatiles[J]. The forestry Chronicle, 2003, 79:685-691
[83]	Jakus R. A method for the protection of spruce stands against Ips typographus by the use of barriers of pheromone traps in north-eastern Slovakia[J]. Anzeiger fur schadlingskunde pflanzenschutz umweltschutz, 1998, 71: 152-158
[84]	Shea P J, Neustein M. Protection of a rare stand of Torrey pine from Ips paraconfusus. Application of Semiochemicals for Management of Bark Beetle Infestations // Salom S M,Hobson K R. Proceedings of an Informal Conference, USDA, Forest Service. General Technical Report INT: GTR-318, 1995:123-456
[85]	Harley P, Fridd-Stroud V, Greenberg J, et al.. Emission of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol by pines:a potentially large natural source of reactive carbon to the atmosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(25):479-486
[86]	Strom B L, Roton L M, Goyer R A, et al.. Visual and semiochemical disruption of host finding in the southern pine beetle[J]. Ecological Applications, 1999, 9: 1028-1038
[87]	Campbell S A,Borden J H. Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and non-hosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) [J]. Ecological Entomology, 2006, 31(5): 437-449
[88]	Campbell S A,Borden J H. Close-range, in-flight integration of olfactory and visual information by a host- seeking bark beetle[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2006, 120(2): 91-98
[89]	Campbell S A, Borden J H. Additive and synergistic integration of multimodal cues of both hosts and non-hosts during host selection by woodboring insects[J]. Oikos, 2009, 118(4): 553-563

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3120) PDF downloads(1809) Cited by()

Proportional views

Research Progress in the Effects of Non-host Volatiles to Conifer-inhabiting Bark Beetles

1. College of Forestry, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071000, Hebei,China

2. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Protection, State Forestry Administration, Beijing

3. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Protection, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

Received Date: 2008-11-08

Abstract: Conifer bark beetles are able not only to recognize, but also to avoid non-host habitats, non-host species and unsuitable hosts by semiochemicals. Green leaf volatiles (GLV), especially C6-alcohols from the leaves and C8-alcohols from bark of non-host angiosperm trees may represent non-host odor signals, and play important roles in the host searching process of conifer-inhabiting bark beetle. The study bases of GLV and avoidance of non-host volatiles, the factors affecting tree volatile emissions, collection, analysis and bioassay methods of non-host volatiles, ecological and evolutionary significance of non-host volatiles were summarized. The bark beetle searching for suitable host was not the result of a single factor but multiple signals. Non-host volatiles could be used in the management of conifer-inhabiting bark beetle.

HTML

Reference (89)

[1]	Wood S L. The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) of North and Central America: A Taxonomic Monograph .Great Basin Natural Memograph, Brigham Young University Provo, Utah, 1982, no 6
[2]	Kelley S T, Farrel B D. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae) [J]. Evolution, 1998, 52:1731-1743
[3]	Sequeira A S, Normark B B, Farrell B D. Evolutionary assembly of the conifer fauna: distinguishing ancient from recent associations in bark beetles . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B), 2000, 267:2359-2366
[4]	Dethier V G. Mechanism of host-plant recognition [J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1982, 31:49-56
[5]	Visser J H. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1986, 31:121-144
[6]	Dobson H E M. Floral volatiles in insect biology. Insect Plant Interactions[M], vol. 5.Bernays E A. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida, USA,1994: 47-81
[7]	Bernays E A. Plant-insect interactions-a synthesis . Abstract Book I. XXI-International Congress of Entomology. August. International Congress of Entomology, Brazil, 2000: Vlll-Xlll.20-26
[8]	Atkins M D. Behavioral variation among scolytids in relation to their habitat [J]. Canadian Entomologist, 1966, 98:285-288
[9]	Raffa K F, Benyman A A. Interacting selective pressures in conifer bark beetle systems: a basis for reciprocal adaptations[J] American Naturalist, 1987, 129: 234-262
[10]	Byers J A. Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles[M]// Carde R T, Bell W J. Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. Chapman and Hall, New Yark, 1995:154-213
[11]	Borden J H. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles [M]// Carde R T, Minks A K. Pheromone Research:New Directions,1997:421-438
[12]	Schlyter F, Birgersson Cz. Forest Beetles[M]// Hardic R J,Minks A. Pheromones of Non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK,1999: 113-148
[13]	Petersonnjk H E. Squash legal and ulartrichome volatile: identification and influence on behavior of female pickleworm moth Diaphania nitidalis[J]. Chemical Ecology, 1994, 20:2099-2109.
[14]	Paulwp J. Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores[J]. Plant Physiology, 1999,121:325-331
[15]	Muller T L. Volatile organic compounds emitted from beech leaves[J]. Phytochemistry, 1996,43:759-762
[16]	杜家纬.植物-昆虫间的化学通讯及其行为控制[J]. 植物生理学报,2001,27(3):193-200
[17]	Boren J H, Bennett R B, Acontinuously recording flight mile for investigating the effects of volatile substance on the flight of the red insect[J]. Ecolentomol,1969, 62(4):782-785
[18]	Byers J A. An encounter rate model of bark beetle populations searching at random for susceptible host trees[J]. Ecological Model,1996, 91:57-66
[19]	Zhang Q H. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer bark beetles . Ph.D. Thesis (Agraria 264). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Alnarp, Sweden, 2001
[20]	陈辉,李宗波.植物挥发性化合物在小蠹虫寄主选择中的作用[J]. 福建林学院学报,2006,26(1):87-91
[21]	Zhang Q H, Birgerss G., Zhu J W, et al.. Leaf volatiles from nonhost deciduous trees:variation by tree species, season,and temperature and electrophysiological activity in Ips typographus[J].Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1999a, 25(8):1923-1943
[22]	Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Anderson P. Green leaf volatiles interrupt pheromone response of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1999b, 25(12):2847-2861
[23]	Wilson L M, Borden J H, Gries R, et al.. Green leaf volatiles as antiaggregants for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1996, 22: 1861-1875
[24]	Schlyter F, Zhang Q H, Anderson P, et al.. Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of pine shoot beetles, Tomicus piniperda and T. minor (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), to non-host leaf and bark volatiles[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 2000, 132: 965-98
[25]	Wood D L.The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles[J]. Annual Review of Entomology,1982, 27: 411-446
[26]	Jactel H, van Halder I, Menassieu P, et al.. Non-host volatiles disrupt the response of the stenographer bark beetle Ips sexdentatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromone baited traps and maritime pine log[J].Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 2001, 6:197-207
[27]	Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Birgersson G. Bark volatiles from non-host deciduous trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus(L.) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis[J]. Chemoecology, 2000, 10: 69-80
[28]	ZHANG Long-wa, Nancy E G, SUN Jiang-hua. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Dendroctonus valens to non-host volatiles[J]. Annual Forest Science, 2007, 64: 267-273
[29]	Guerrero A, Feixas J, Pajares J, et al.. Semiochemically induced inhibition of behaviour of Tomicus destruens(Woll) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1997, 84: 155-157
[30]	Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, et al.. Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles found in the bark of nonhost angiosperms[J]. Journal of chemical ecology, 1999, 25: 805-816
[31]	Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, et al.. A survey of antennal responses by five species of conniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees[J]. Chemoecology, 2000a, 10: 103-113
[32]	Morewood W D, Simmonds K E, Gries R, et al.. Disruption by conophthotin of the kairomone response of sawyer beetles to bark beetle pheromones[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29(9): 2115-2129
[33]	Byers J A. Attraction of bark beetles,Tomicus piniperda,Hylurgops palliates,and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1992, 18(12): 2385-2402
[34]	Zhang Q H, Liu G T, Schlyter F, et al.. Olfactory response of Ips duplicatus to nonhost leaf and bark volatiles in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2001, 27: 955-1009
[35]	Ross D W, Datermen G E. Efficacy of antiaggregation pheromone for reducing douglas-fir beetle infestation in high risk stands[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1995,127:805-811
[36]	Wood D L. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and and allomones in the host selection and colonization of bark beetles[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1982, 27:411-446
[37]	杨群芳,周祖基,李庆.植物精油对云南松纵坑切梢小蠹的驱避活性研究[J].西南农业大学学报, 2003, 25(4): 357-3591
[38]	Gries G. Prospects of new semiochemicals and technologies. Application of Semiochemical for Management of Bark Beetle infestations //Salom S M,Hobson K R. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report. INT-GTR-318,1995:44-47
[39]	Kohnle U. Host and non-host odour signals governing host selection by the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda and the spruce bark beetle, Hylurgops palliatus (Col., Scolytidae) [J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2004, 128(9-10):588-592
[40]	Dickens J C, Billings R F, Payne T L. Green leaf volatiles interrupt aggregation pheromone response in bark beetles infecting pines[J]. Experientia, 1992, 48: 523-524
[41]	Byers J A, Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, et al.. Volatiles from non-host birch tree inhabit pheromone response in spruce bark beetles[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1998, 85: 557-561
[42]	Groot P D E. Green leaf volatiles inhabit response of red pine cone beetle Conophthorus resinosae(Coleopter, Scolytide) to a sex pheromone[J]. Natutwissenschaften,1999, 86(2): 81-85
[43]	Zhang Q H.Interruption of aggregation pheromones in Ips typographus (L.) (Col. Scolytidae) by non-host bark volatiles[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entommology, 2003, 5(2): 142-152.
[44]	Fettig C J, Borys R R, Dabney C P, et al.. Disruption of red turpentine attraction to baited traps by the addition of California five spined ips pheromone components[J]. Canadian Entomology, 2005, 137:748-752
[45]	Teranishi R, Kint S. Bioactive volatile compounds from plants: an overview [M]//Teranishi R. Buttery R G ,Sugisawa H. Bioactive Volatile Compounds from Plants. American Chemical Society, Washington,D.C., 1993: 1-5
[46]	Robinson T. The organic Constituents of Higher Plants[M], Cordus Press, North Amherst, MA, 1983
[47]	Metcalf R L, Metcalf E R. Plant Kairomones in Insect Ecology and Control[M]. Chapman &Hall, Academic Press, New York, 1992
[48]	Francke W, Bartels J, Meyer H, et al.. Semiochemicals from bark beetles:new results,remarks,and reflections[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1995, 21:1043-1063
[49]	Borden J H, Wilson I M, Gries R, et al.. Volatiles from the bark of trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx.(Salicaceae) disrupt secondary attraction by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera:Scolytide)[J]. Chemoecology, 1998, 8: 69-75
[50]	Zhang Q H, Tollasch T, Schlyter F, et al.. Enantiospecific antennal response by bark beetle (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to the spiroacetal E-conophthorin[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2002, 28:1839-1852
[51]	Tollsten L, Knudsen J T. Floral scent in deciduous Salix (Salicaceae)-acue determining the pollination system? [J] Plant Systematics and Evolution, 1992, 82: 229-237
[52]	Millar J G,Haynes K F. Methods in Chemical Ecology:Chemical Methods[M]. Kluwer. Norwel, 1998
[53]	Huber D P W, Borden, J H, Stastny M. Response of the pine engraver, Ips pini(Say) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), to conophthorin and other angiosperm, bark volatiles in the avoidance of non-hosts[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2001, 3:225-232
[54]	Payne T L. Pheromone perception. [M] // Birch M C. Pheromones. Elsevier-North Holland Publishers Amsterdam,1974: 31-61
[55]	Arn H, Stadler E, Rauscher S. The electroantennographic detector-a selective and sensitive tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones[J]. Zeitschrift fitr Naturforschung, 1975, 30c:722-725
[56]	Schroder L M. Olfactory recognition of nonhost aspen and birch by conifer bark beetle Tomicus pinipenta and Hylurgops palliates[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1992,18:1583-1593
[57]	Ross D W, Datermen G E. Efficacy of antiaggregation pheromone for reducing douglas-fir beetle infestation in high risk stands[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1995, 127:805-811
[58]	Leather S R, Watt A F. Insest-induced chemical changes in yang lodgpole pine(Pinus contorta); the effect of previous defoliation on oviposition, growth and survival of the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea[J]. Ecological Entomology, 1987, 12: 275-281
[59]	Byers J A. Effect of mating on terminating aggregation during host colonization in the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus[J] Journal of Chemical Ecology,1981a,7(1): 1135-1146
[60]	杨群芳,周祖基,李庆. 云南松纵坑切梢小蠹驱避作用测定方法初探[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2003,21(3):226-229
[61]	于诚铭,张庆贺. 落叶松八齿小蠹聚集信息素生物活性及分泌规律[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1988,16(4):1-7
[62]	殷彩霞, 高竹林, 吕军, 等. 纵坑切梢小蠹对云南松枝梢提取物趋性测试[J]. 昆虫知识,2002, 39(5):384-386
[63]	Ting D T, Turner D P, Weber J A. Factors controlling the emissions of monoterpenes and other volatile organic compounds [M]// Sharkey T D, Holland E A, Mooney H A. Trace Gas Emissions by Plants. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego,1991:93-119
[64]	Charron C S, Cantiliffe D J, Heath R R. Volatile emissions from plants[J]. Horticultural Review, 1995, 17:43-72
[65]	Guenther A B, Monson R K, Fall R. Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: observations with eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm development[J]. Journal of Guophysical Research, 1991, 96: 10799-10808
[66]	Dement W A, Tyson B J, Mooney H A. Mechanism of monoterpene volatilization in Salvia mellifera[J]. Phytochemistry, 1975, 14:2555-2557
[67]	Kamiysma K, Takai T, Yamanaka Y. Correlation between volatile substances released from plants and meteorological conditions . White E T, Hetherington P, Thiele B R. Proceedings from the International Clean Air Conferece, Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan,1978:365-372
[68]	Tingey D T, Manning M, Ratsch H C, et al.. Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine[J]. Plant Physiology, 1980, 65:797-801
[69]	Yukouchi Y, Ambe Y. Factors affecting the emission of monoterpenes from red pine (Pinus densiflora)[J]. Plant Physiology, 1984, 75:1009-1012
[70]	Staudt M, Seufert G. Light-dependent emission of monoterpenes by holm oak (Quercus ilex L.)[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1995, 82:89-92
[71]	Gleizes M, Pauly G, Bernard-Dagan C, et al.. Effects of light on terpene hydrocarbon synthesis in pinus pinaster[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1980, 50:16-20
[72]	Hall G D, Langenheim J H. Temporal changes in the leaf monoterpenes of Sequoia sempervirens[J]. Biochemical systematics and Ecology, 1986, 14:61-69
[73]	Isidorov V A, Zenkevich I G, Ioffe B V. Volatile organic compounds in the Atmosphere of forests[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1985, 19:1-8
[74]	Kimmerer T W, Kozlowski T T. Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde, and ethanol production by plants under stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 1982, 69:840-847
[75]	Pare P W, Tumlinson J H. Plant volatile signals in response to herbivore feeding[J]. Florida Entomologist, 1996, 79:93-103
[76]	Winer A M, Arey J, Atkinson R, et al.. Emission rates of organics from vegetation in Californias central valley[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1992, 26A:2647-2659
[77]	Zhang Q H, Schlyter F. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2004, 6:1-19
[78]	Vite J P, Baader E. Present and future use of semiochemical in pest management of bark beetle[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1990, 16: 3031-3041
[79]	Byers J A, Zhang Q H, Birgersson G. Strategies of a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in an olfactory landscape[J]. Natururwissenscenschaften, 2000, 87:503-507
[80]	Erbilgin N, Raffa K F. Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetle to their aggregation pheromones[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2000, 26:2527-2548
[81]	Huber D P W, Borden J H. Protection of lodgepole pines from mass attack by mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, with nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001b, 99:131-141
[82]	Borden J H, Chong L J, Earle T J, et al.. Protection of logepole pine from attack by the mountain pine beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae(Coleoptera:Scolytide) using high dose of verbenone in combination with nonhost bark volatiles[J]. The forestry Chronicle, 2003, 79:685-691
[83]	Jakus R. A method for the protection of spruce stands against Ips typographus by the use of barriers of pheromone traps in north-eastern Slovakia[J]. Anzeiger fur schadlingskunde pflanzenschutz umweltschutz, 1998, 71: 152-158
[84]	Shea P J, Neustein M. Protection of a rare stand of Torrey pine from Ips paraconfusus. Application of Semiochemicals for Management of Bark Beetle Infestations // Salom S M,Hobson K R. Proceedings of an Informal Conference, USDA, Forest Service. General Technical Report INT: GTR-318, 1995:123-456
[85]	Harley P, Fridd-Stroud V, Greenberg J, et al.. Emission of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol by pines:a potentially large natural source of reactive carbon to the atmosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(25):479-486
[86]	Strom B L, Roton L M, Goyer R A, et al.. Visual and semiochemical disruption of host finding in the southern pine beetle[J]. Ecological Applications, 1999, 9: 1028-1038
[87]	Campbell S A,Borden J H. Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and non-hosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) [J]. Ecological Entomology, 2006, 31(5): 437-449
[88]	Campbell S A,Borden J H. Close-range, in-flight integration of olfactory and visual information by a host- seeking bark beetle[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2006, 120(2): 91-98
[89]	Campbell S A, Borden J H. Additive and synergistic integration of multimodal cues of both hosts and non-hosts during host selection by woodboring insects[J]. Oikos, 2009, 118(4): 553-563

Research Progress in the Effects of Non-host Volatiles to Conifer-inhabiting Bark Beetles

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Research Progress in the Effects of Non-host Volatiles to Conifer-inhabiting Bark Beetles

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content