Carbon Concentration Storage and Partition of Populus×euramericana "Zhonglin-46" in Shelterbelts

GENG Xiang-guo; WU Bin; ZHANG Yu-qing; LI Chun-ping; LI Zhi-pei; ZHENG Hui

Volume 24 Issue 2

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2011 > 24(2): 267-271

Citation:

Carbon Concentration Storage and Partition of Populus×euramericana "Zhonglin-46" in Shelterbelts

1.
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Key Laboratory of Soil ＆ Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Chinese Society of Water and Soil Conservation, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2010-01-30

Abstract

Carbon partition in plants is one of the key points for carbon cycle research. In order to estimate the carbon storage of shelterbelts in plain areas of China accurately, the method of biomass inventory was used to study the individual biomass, organ carbon storage and partition in different organs of 8, 10, 13 and 16 year-old poplar shelterbelts in Yuncheng, Shandong Province. The results indicated that the biomass of different poplar organs followed the pattern of trunk>branch>root>leaf, and the biomass of trunk and branch accounted for about 80% of the total. The carbon concentration of the different organs followed leaf>branch >trunk >root. The carbon concentration of different organs ranged between 43.51% and 70.49%. The carbon concentration of the four age groups’ shelterbelts were higher than 50%, which was slightly higher than the average carbon concentration of poplar in Northern China(48.80%). The variation coefficient of carbon concentration was the smallest for leaf, and the largest for root. As for the difference of carbon concentration, it was significant among different organs for all the four age groups, and not significant among the whole trees for the four age groups. The carbon storage was closely related to its biomass for all tree organs, and its sequence was trunk>branch>root>leaf. The proportion of trunk carbon storage obviously increased with tree age.

References

[1]	Pacala S W, Hurtt G C, Baker D,et al. Consistent land and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates[J]. Science,2001,292: 2316-2320
[2]	史军,刘纪远,高志强,等.造林对陆地碳汇影响的研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(2):58-67
[3]	张小全,武曙红,何英,等.森林、林业活动与温室气体的减排增汇[J].林业科学,2005,41(6):150-156
[4]	雷丕锋,项文化,田大伦,等.樟树人工林生态系统碳素贮量与分布研究[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(4):25-30
[5]	裴志永,欧阳华,周才平.青藏高原高寒草原碳排放及其迁移过程研究[J].生态学报, 2003,23(2):231-236
[6]	何斌,刘运华,余浩光等.南宁马占相思人工林生态系统碳素密度与贮量[J].林业科学,2009,45(2):6-11
[7]	Fang J Y, Chen A P,Peng C H, et al. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in china between 1949 and 1998[J].Science, 2001,292:2320-2322
[8]	方精云,郭兆迪,朴世龙,等.1981-2000 年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J].中国科学 D:地球科学,2007,37(6):804-812
[9]	康惠宁, 马钦彦, 袁嘉祖.中国森林C汇功能基本估计[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(3):230-234
[10]	刘国华, 傅伯杰, 方精云.中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):733-740
[11]	孙玉军,张俊,韩爱惠,等.兴安落叶松(Larix gmelini)幼中龄林的生物量与碳汇功能[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):1756-1762
[12]	David E R, Zhanna Y, Allison L B. Loss and recovery of ecosystem carbon pools following stand-replacing wildfire in Michigan jack pine forests[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 34(9): 1908-1918
[13]	方晰,田大伦,项文化.速生阶段杉木人工林碳素密度、贮量和分布[J].林业科学,2002,38(3):14-19
[14]	魏文俊,王兵,白秀兰,等.杉木人工林碳密度特征与分配规律研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2008,30(1):73-80
[15]	Niu D, Wang S L, Ouyang Z Y. Comparisons of carbon storages in Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei plantations during a 22-year period in southern China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009,21(6):801-805
[16]	江泽慧,范少辉,冯慧想,等.华北沙地小黑杨人工林生物量及其分配规律[J].林业科学,2007,43(11):15-20
[17]	宗萍萍,鲍玉海,杨吉华,等.黄泛沙地小网格农田防护林网防护效应的研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):110-113
[18]	李继红.绥化市秦家镇农田防护林网络架构及生态农业效益分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(6):101-106
[19]	李建华,李春静,彭世揆.杨树人工林生物量估计方法与应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2007,31(4):37-40
[20]	Easterling W E, Brandle J R, Hays C J, et al.Simulating the impact of human land use change on forest composition in the great plains agroecosystems with the seedcape model[J]. Ecology Model, 2001, 140:163-176
[21]	陈军.杨树人工林地上生物量和碳储量研究 .北京:北京林业大学,2007
[22]	Chiba Y. Plant form based on the pipe model theory Ⅱ. quantitative analysis of ramification in morphology[J]. Ecological Research, 1991, 6:21-28
[23]	马钦彦,陈遐林,王娟,等.华北主要森林类型建群种的含碳率分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5):96-100
[24]	康冰,刘世荣,张广军,等.广西大青山南亚热带马尾松、杉木混交林生态系统碳素积累和分配特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1320-1329
[25]	方升佐,章小明,徐锡增,等.杨树无性系生物量生产的三维模拟研究[J].南京林业大学学报,1999,23(5):7-12

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3148) PDF downloads(1457) Cited by()

Proportional views

Carbon Concentration Storage and Partition of Populus×euramericana "Zhonglin-46" in Shelterbelts

1. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Key Laboratory of Soil ＆ Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China

2. Chinese Society of Water and Soil Conservation, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2010-01-30

Abstract: Carbon partition in plants is one of the key points for carbon cycle research. In order to estimate the carbon storage of shelterbelts in plain areas of China accurately, the method of biomass inventory was used to study the individual biomass, organ carbon storage and partition in different organs of 8, 10, 13 and 16 year-old poplar shelterbelts in Yuncheng, Shandong Province. The results indicated that the biomass of different poplar organs followed the pattern of trunk>branch>root>leaf, and the biomass of trunk and branch accounted for about 80% of the total. The carbon concentration of the different organs followed leaf>branch >trunk >root. The carbon concentration of different organs ranged between 43.51% and 70.49%. The carbon concentration of the four age groups’ shelterbelts were higher than 50%, which was slightly higher than the average carbon concentration of poplar in Northern China(48.80%). The variation coefficient of carbon concentration was the smallest for leaf, and the largest for root. As for the difference of carbon concentration, it was significant among different organs for all the four age groups, and not significant among the whole trees for the four age groups. The carbon storage was closely related to its biomass for all tree organs, and its sequence was trunk>branch>root>leaf. The proportion of trunk carbon storage obviously increased with tree age.

HTML

Reference (25)

[1]	Pacala S W, Hurtt G C, Baker D,et al. Consistent land and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates[J]. Science,2001,292: 2316-2320
[2]	史军,刘纪远,高志强,等.造林对陆地碳汇影响的研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(2):58-67
[3]	张小全,武曙红,何英,等.森林、林业活动与温室气体的减排增汇[J].林业科学,2005,41(6):150-156
[4]	雷丕锋,项文化,田大伦,等.樟树人工林生态系统碳素贮量与分布研究[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(4):25-30
[5]	裴志永,欧阳华,周才平.青藏高原高寒草原碳排放及其迁移过程研究[J].生态学报, 2003,23(2):231-236
[6]	何斌,刘运华,余浩光等.南宁马占相思人工林生态系统碳素密度与贮量[J].林业科学,2009,45(2):6-11
[7]	Fang J Y, Chen A P,Peng C H, et al. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in china between 1949 and 1998[J].Science, 2001,292:2320-2322
[8]	方精云,郭兆迪,朴世龙,等.1981-2000 年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J].中国科学 D:地球科学,2007,37(6):804-812
[9]	康惠宁, 马钦彦, 袁嘉祖.中国森林C汇功能基本估计[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(3):230-234
[10]	刘国华, 傅伯杰, 方精云.中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):733-740
[11]	孙玉军,张俊,韩爱惠,等.兴安落叶松(Larix gmelini)幼中龄林的生物量与碳汇功能[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):1756-1762
[12]	David E R, Zhanna Y, Allison L B. Loss and recovery of ecosystem carbon pools following stand-replacing wildfire in Michigan jack pine forests[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 34(9): 1908-1918
[13]	方晰,田大伦,项文化.速生阶段杉木人工林碳素密度、贮量和分布[J].林业科学,2002,38(3):14-19
[14]	魏文俊,王兵,白秀兰,等.杉木人工林碳密度特征与分配规律研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2008,30(1):73-80
[15]	Niu D, Wang S L, Ouyang Z Y. Comparisons of carbon storages in Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei plantations during a 22-year period in southern China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009,21(6):801-805
[16]	江泽慧,范少辉,冯慧想,等.华北沙地小黑杨人工林生物量及其分配规律[J].林业科学,2007,43(11):15-20
[17]	宗萍萍,鲍玉海,杨吉华,等.黄泛沙地小网格农田防护林网防护效应的研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):110-113
[18]	李继红.绥化市秦家镇农田防护林网络架构及生态农业效益分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(6):101-106
[19]	李建华,李春静,彭世揆.杨树人工林生物量估计方法与应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2007,31(4):37-40
[20]	Easterling W E, Brandle J R, Hays C J, et al.Simulating the impact of human land use change on forest composition in the great plains agroecosystems with the seedcape model[J]. Ecology Model, 2001, 140:163-176
[21]	陈军.杨树人工林地上生物量和碳储量研究 .北京:北京林业大学,2007
[22]	Chiba Y. Plant form based on the pipe model theory Ⅱ. quantitative analysis of ramification in morphology[J]. Ecological Research, 1991, 6:21-28
[23]	马钦彦,陈遐林,王娟,等.华北主要森林类型建群种的含碳率分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5):96-100
[24]	康冰,刘世荣,张广军,等.广西大青山南亚热带马尾松、杉木混交林生态系统碳素积累和分配特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1320-1329
[25]	方升佐,章小明,徐锡增,等.杨树无性系生物量生产的三维模拟研究[J].南京林业大学学报,1999,23(5):7-12

Carbon Concentration Storage and Partition of Populus×euramericana "Zhonglin-46" in Shelterbelts

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Carbon Concentration Storage and Partition of Populus×euramericana "Zhonglin-46" in Shelterbelts

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content