• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Population Structure and Distribution Pattern of Dominant

  • Received Date: 2010-12-06
  • The size structure, survival curve, dispersion coefficient, index of nearest neighbor and Ripley's K function were used to analyze the population structure and distribution pattern of dominant tree species in the ancient tea tree community in Ailao Mountains of Yunnan Province. The results showed that there were 2 894 free-standing individuals with DBH≥1.0 cm recorded in the 1.2 hm2 plot, belonging to 48 species, 38 genera and 22 families. Camellia sinensis var. assamica was ranked the first in terms of importance value with the highest abundance and Lithocarpus xylocarpus was ranked the second, although it had the largest relative dominancy. Then the community should be defined as mid-montane humid evergreen broad-leaved forest with Camellia sinensis var. assamica, L. xylocarpus, etc. being the dominant tree species. Now it is in the climax of succession series. Among 10 dominant tree species, L. xylocarpus, Manglietia insignis, Castanopsis wattii were of declining populations since their seedlings and saplings were scarce and the big trees were numerous. These three species tended to be in random distribution at most of scales, but clump intensity increased as population grew. Camellia sinensis var. assamica, Lithocarpus hancei and Myrsine semiserrata were of stable populations since theirs saplings, middle-sized trees were numerous and the big trees were scarce. Litsea honghoensis, Actinodaphne forrestii, Neolitsea polycarpa and Camellia pitardii were of growing populations since their seedlings and saplings were numerous and the big trees were scarce. These seven species tended to be in clumped distribution at most of scales, but clump intensity decreased as population grew. The spatiotemporal variations of population structure and distribution pattern reflected the competition between these species and the trends of succession of community.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 黄桂枢. 世界茶王-云南镇沅千家寨野生古茶树[J]. 农业考古, 1997(2): 202-203

    [2] 余世孝. 数学生态学导论[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1995

    [3] 郑师章, 吴千红, 王海波, 等. 普通生态学——原理、方法和运用[M].上海: 复旦大学出版社,1994

    [4] 张金屯. 植物种群空间分布点格局分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 1998, 22(4): 344-349

    [5] 付必谦. 生态学实验原理与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006

    [6]

    Greig-Smith P. Quantitative Plant Ecoloty[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983
    [7] 石胜友,尚 进,田海燕,等. 缙云山风灾迹地常绿阔叶林生态恢复过程中优势种群分布格局和动态[J]. 武汉植物学研究,2003,21(4): 321-326

    [8] 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004

    [9] 兰国玉, 雷瑞德. 植物种群空间分布格局研究方法概述[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2003, 18(2): 17-21

    [10] 李海涛. 植物种群分布格局研究概况[J]. 植物学通报, 1995, 12(2): 19-26

    [11] 覃 林. 统计生态学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2009

    [12]

    Füldner K. Zur Strukturbeschreibung in Mischbestnden[J]. Forstarehiv, 1995,66: 235-240
    [13] 戴小华,余世孝,练琚蕍.海南岛霸王岭热带雨林的种间分离[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(3): 380-387

    [14]

    Ripley B D. Modeling spatial pattern[J]. Journal of the Royal Stastical Society, Series B, 1977, 39: 178-212
    [15]

    Hanus M, Hann D W, Marshall D D. Reconstructing the spatial pattern of trees from routine stand examination measurements[J]. Forest Science, 1998, 44(1): 125-133
    [16] 汤孟平, 唐守正,雷相东,等. Ripley's K(d) 函数分析种群空间分布格局的边缘校正[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(8): 1533-1538

    [17]

    Deevey E. Life tables for natural populations of animals[J]. Quart Rev Biol,1947,22:283-314
    [18] 吴承桢, 洪 伟, 谢金寿, 等. 珍稀濒危植物长苞铁杉种群生命表分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11 (3): 333 - 336

    [19]

    Gittins R. Canonnica Analysis, A Review with Applications in Ecology [M]. Berlin: Sprinter Verlag, 1985
    [20] 王伯荪, 李鸣光, 彭少麟. 植物种群学[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社,1995

    [21] 彭少麟. 南亚热带森林群落动态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1996

    [22] 张文辉. 裂叶沙参种群生态学研究[M]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,1998

    [23]

    Smith C C, Reichman O J. The evolution of food caching by birds and mammals [J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1984, 15: 329-351
    [24]

    Vander Wall S B. Effects of seed size of wind-dispersed pines (Pinus) on secondary seed dispersal and the caching behavior of rodents [J]. Oikos, 2003, 100: 25-34
    [25] 肖治术, 张知彬. 都江堰林区小型兽类取食林木种子的调查[J]. 兽类学报, 2004,24(2): 121-124

    [26] 杨洪晓, 张金屯, 吴 波, 等. 毛乌素沙地油蒿种群点格局分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 563-570

    [27] 吴征镒, 朱彦丞. 云南植被[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987

    [28]

    Stoyan D, Penttinen A. Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics[J]. Statistical Science, 2000, 15: 61-78
    [29]

    Dale M R T, Dixon P, Fortin M J, et al. Conceptual and mathematical relationships among methods for spatial analysis[J]. Ecography, 2002, 25: 558-577
    [30] 王丽君, 梁士楚, 李 峰, 等. 桂林岩溶石山桂林白蜡种群点格局分析[J]. 广西植物, 2008, 28(5): 633-635

    [31] 曹晏宁, 史利莎, 韩 烁, 等. 科尔沁沙地植被恢复中差不嘎蒿种群不同龄级个体的点格局分析[J]. 植物学通报, 2008, 25(4): 437-442

    [32] 李文良, 张小平, 郝朝运, 等. 湘鄂皖连香树种群的年龄结构和点格局分析[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6): 3321-3330

    [33] 岳永杰, 余新晓, 秦富仓, 等. 北京雾灵山保护区蒙椴空间点格局分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009(2): 49-54

    [34] 苏爱玲, 徐广平, 段吉闯, 等. 祁连山金露梅灌丛草甸群落结构及主要种群的点格局分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30(6): 1231-1239

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3598) PDF downloads(1722) Cited by()

Proportional views

Population Structure and Distribution Pattern of Dominant

  • 1. Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan, China
  • 2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3. Yunnan Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, China

Abstract: The size structure, survival curve, dispersion coefficient, index of nearest neighbor and Ripley's K function were used to analyze the population structure and distribution pattern of dominant tree species in the ancient tea tree community in Ailao Mountains of Yunnan Province. The results showed that there were 2 894 free-standing individuals with DBH≥1.0 cm recorded in the 1.2 hm2 plot, belonging to 48 species, 38 genera and 22 families. Camellia sinensis var. assamica was ranked the first in terms of importance value with the highest abundance and Lithocarpus xylocarpus was ranked the second, although it had the largest relative dominancy. Then the community should be defined as mid-montane humid evergreen broad-leaved forest with Camellia sinensis var. assamica, L. xylocarpus, etc. being the dominant tree species. Now it is in the climax of succession series. Among 10 dominant tree species, L. xylocarpus, Manglietia insignis, Castanopsis wattii were of declining populations since their seedlings and saplings were scarce and the big trees were numerous. These three species tended to be in random distribution at most of scales, but clump intensity increased as population grew. Camellia sinensis var. assamica, Lithocarpus hancei and Myrsine semiserrata were of stable populations since theirs saplings, middle-sized trees were numerous and the big trees were scarce. Litsea honghoensis, Actinodaphne forrestii, Neolitsea polycarpa and Camellia pitardii were of growing populations since their seedlings and saplings were numerous and the big trees were scarce. These seven species tended to be in clumped distribution at most of scales, but clump intensity decreased as population grew. The spatiotemporal variations of population structure and distribution pattern reflected the competition between these species and the trends of succession of community.

Reference (34)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return