Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties at Different Developmental Stages of Larix kaempferi Plantations in Xiaolongshan, Gansu Province

WANG Hong-xing; SUN Xiao-mei; CHEN Dong-sheng; SHEN Ya-zhou; MA Jian-wei

Volume 25 Issue 3

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2012 > 25(3): 294-301

Citation:

Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties at Different Developmental Stages of Larix kaempferi Plantations in Xiaolongshan, Gansu Province

1.
Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China
2.
Xiaolongshan Research Institute of Forest Science and Technology, Tianshui 741022, Gansu, China

Received Date: 2011-11-25

Abstract

The changes of soil physical and chemical properties at different developmental stages (6, 15, 23, and 35 years old) of larch (Larix kaempferi Carr.) plantations were investigated and analyzed with chronosequence method in the forest area of Xiaolongshan in Gansu Province. By the method of principal component analysis, the integrated fertility indexes for larch plantations were calculated taking the contribution rate of each principal component character as weight. The results showed that the soil physical and chemical properties were deteriorated in the pre-mature stands with the growth of larch plantations. For example, the soil bulk density increased to 1.62 g·cm-3, the capillary porosity and maximum moisture capacity decreased to 29.69% and 24.45%, while the amounts of soil organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and calcium decreased. The soil properties from pre-mature to mature forest stage showed the value of soil physical and chemical properties recovered, such as the soil bulk density decreased to 1.21 g·cm-3, the capillary porosity and maximum moisture capacity increased to 45.56% and 42.65%, and the amounts of soil nutrient returned to high level, even much higher than the level of the middle age forest. The integrated fertility indexes (IFI) of the soil were -0.329, 0.188, -0.565 and 0.739 in the young, middle, pre-mature, and mature plantations respectively, so the soil properties of pre-mature forest displayed the worst values, while those of the mature was the best.
- Larix kaempferi,
- plantation,
- soil properties,
- developmental stages

References

[1]	周莉,代力名,谷会岩,等.长白山阔叶红松林采伐迹地土壤养分含量动态研究[J]. 应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1771-1775
[2]	王海燕,雷相东,张会儒,等.近天然落叶松云冷杉林土壤养分特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2009,37(11):68-73
[3]	陈立新.落叶松人工林土壤质量变化规律与调控措施的研究 . 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2003:1-10
[4]	盛炜彤,范少辉.杉木及其人工林自身特性对长期立地生产力的影响[J]. 林业科学研究,2002, 15(6):629-636
[5]	盛炜彤,范少辉,马详庆,等.杉木人工林长期生产力保持机制研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2005
[6]	康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.马尾松人工林林分密度对林下植被及土壤性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(10):2323-2331
[7]	杨承栋.造林树种土壤质量演化与调控机理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009
[8]	马常耕,孙晓梅.我国落叶松遗传改良现状及发展方向[J]. 世界林业研究,2008,21(3):58-63
[9]	马常耕.落叶松种与种源选择[M]. 北京:北京农业大学出版社,1992:1-15
[10]	刘世荣,李春阳.落叶松人工林养分循环过程与潜在地力衰退趋势的研究[J]. 东北林业大学报,1993,21(2):20-24
[11]	Liu Shirong, Li Xuemin, Niu Limin.The degradation of soil fertility in pure larch plantations in the northeastern part of China[J]. Ecological Engineering,1998,10:75-86
[12]	陈立新,肖洋.大兴安岭落叶松林地不同发育阶段土壤肥力演变与评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2006,4(5):50-55
[13]	陈立新,陈祥伟,段文标.落叶松人工林凋落物与土壤肥力变化的研究[J]. 应用生态学报,1998, 9(6):581-586
[14]	闫德仁.落叶松人工林土壤肥力变化的研究[J]. 生态学杂志,1993,12(3):8-10
[15]	闫德仁,刘永军,张幼军.落叶松人工林土壤养分动态[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2003,31(3):16-18
[16]	闫德仁,王晶莹,杨茂仁.落叶松人工林土壤衰退趋势[J]. 生态学杂志,1997,16(2):62-66
[17]	Yang Kai, Zhu Jiaojun, Yan Qiaoling. Changes in soil P chemistry as affected by conversion of natural secondary forests to larch plantations [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2010,260:422-428
[18]	孙晓梅,张守攻,祁万宜,等.北亚热带高山区日本落叶松造林整地与抚育技术的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007,20 (2):235-240
[19]	陈琦,尹粉粉,曹靖,等.秦岭西部不同发育阶段油松和日本落叶松人工林土壤酶活性变化和分布特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(5):466-471
[20]	杨鑫,曹靖,懂茂星,等.外来树种日本落叶松对森林土壤质量及细菌多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2008,19(10):2109-2116
[21]	国家林业局.中华人民共和国林业行业标准:森林土壤分析方法[M]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1999
[22]	北京林业大学.土壤学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1982:132-134
[23]	陈立新.落叶松人工林土壤酸度与有机磷形态的相关性[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(11):2842-2847
[24]	陈立新,段文标,乔璐.落叶松人工林根际与非根际土壤养分特征及酸度研究[J]. 水土保持科学,2011,25(3):131-135
[25]	王海燕,雷相东,陆元昌,等.海南4种典型林分土壤化学性质比较研究[J].林业科学研究, 2009, 22(1):129-133
[26]	王丹,戴伟,王兵,等.杉木人工林不同发育阶段土壤性质变化的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2010,32(3):59-63
[27]	袁颖红,樊后保,黄荣珍,等.连续年龄序列桉树人工林土壤微量元素含量及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报,2009,18(1): 268-273
[28]	徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2002:54-68
[29]	陈喜全,郭秋慧,王政权.落叶松纯林与落叶松胡桃楸混交林下土壤理化性质的研究[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1991,19(专刊):258-274
[30]	李国雷,刘勇,李瑞生,等.油松人工林土壤质量的演变[J]. 林业科学,2008,44(9):76-81
[31]	Burke D J, Weintraub M N, Hewins C R, et al. Relationship between soil enzyme activities, nutrient cycling and soil fungal communities in a northern hardwood forest[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2011,43:795-803
[32]	张昌顺,李昆.人工林地力的衰退与维护研究综述[J]. 世界林业研究,2005,18(1):17-21
[33]	王洪君,宫芳,郑宝仁,等.落叶松人工林的土壤理化性质[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1997,25(3):75-79
[34]	胡亚林,曾德慧,汪思龙,等.管理措施对人工林土壤质量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2007,26(11):1828-1834
[35]	赵其国.中国东部红壤地区土壤退化的时空变化、机理及调控[M].北京:中国科学出版社,2002:38-48
[36]	王燕,刘苑秋,曾炳生,等.江西大岗山常绿阔叶林土壤养分特征研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2010,32(1) :96-100
[37]	Moore T R, Trofymow J A, Taylor B, et al. Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests[J]. Global Change Biology,1999,5:75-82
[38]	郭剑芬,杨玉盛,陈光水,等.森林凋落物分解研究进展[J]. 林业科学,2006,42(4):94-100
[39]	Jacob M, Weland N, Platner C, et al. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf litter of temperate deciduous forest trees along a gradient of increasing tree species diversity[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2009,41:2122-2130
[40]	张鼎华,叶章发,范必有,等.抚育间伐对人工林土壤肥力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2001,12(5):672-676
[41]	林娜,刘勇,李国雷,等.抚育间伐对人工林凋落物分解的影响[J]. 世界林业研究,2010,23(3):44-47
[42]	雷相东,陆元昌,张会儒,等.抚育间伐对落叶松云冷杉混交林的影响[J]. 林业科学,2005,41(4):80-85
[43]	Inagaki Y, Kuramoto S, Torii A, et al. Effects of thinning on leaf-fall and leaf-litter nitrogen concentration in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endlicher) plantation stands in Japan[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255:1859-1867

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3425) PDF downloads(98) Cited by()

Proportional views

Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties at Different Developmental Stages of Larix kaempferi Plantations in Xiaolongshan, Gansu Province

1. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

2. Xiaolongshan Research Institute of Forest Science and Technology, Tianshui 741022, Gansu, China

Received Date: 2011-11-25

Available Online: 2012-06-13

Abstract: The changes of soil physical and chemical properties at different developmental stages (6, 15, 23, and 35 years old) of larch (Larix kaempferi Carr.) plantations were investigated and analyzed with chronosequence method in the forest area of Xiaolongshan in Gansu Province. By the method of principal component analysis, the integrated fertility indexes for larch plantations were calculated taking the contribution rate of each principal component character as weight. The results showed that the soil physical and chemical properties were deteriorated in the pre-mature stands with the growth of larch plantations. For example, the soil bulk density increased to 1.62 g·cm-3, the capillary porosity and maximum moisture capacity decreased to 29.69% and 24.45%, while the amounts of soil organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and calcium decreased. The soil properties from pre-mature to mature forest stage showed the value of soil physical and chemical properties recovered, such as the soil bulk density decreased to 1.21 g·cm-3, the capillary porosity and maximum moisture capacity increased to 45.56% and 42.65%, and the amounts of soil nutrient returned to high level, even much higher than the level of the middle age forest. The integrated fertility indexes (IFI) of the soil were -0.329, 0.188, -0.565 and 0.739 in the young, middle, pre-mature, and mature plantations respectively, so the soil properties of pre-mature forest displayed the worst values, while those of the mature was the best.

HTML

Reference (43)

[1]	周莉,代力名,谷会岩,等.长白山阔叶红松林采伐迹地土壤养分含量动态研究[J]. 应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1771-1775
[2]	王海燕,雷相东,张会儒,等.近天然落叶松云冷杉林土壤养分特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2009,37(11):68-73
[3]	陈立新.落叶松人工林土壤质量变化规律与调控措施的研究 . 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2003:1-10
[4]	盛炜彤,范少辉.杉木及其人工林自身特性对长期立地生产力的影响[J]. 林业科学研究,2002, 15(6):629-636
[5]	盛炜彤,范少辉,马详庆,等.杉木人工林长期生产力保持机制研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2005
[6]	康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.马尾松人工林林分密度对林下植被及土壤性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(10):2323-2331
[7]	杨承栋.造林树种土壤质量演化与调控机理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009
[8]	马常耕,孙晓梅.我国落叶松遗传改良现状及发展方向[J]. 世界林业研究,2008,21(3):58-63
[9]	马常耕.落叶松种与种源选择[M]. 北京:北京农业大学出版社,1992:1-15
[10]	刘世荣,李春阳.落叶松人工林养分循环过程与潜在地力衰退趋势的研究[J]. 东北林业大学报,1993,21(2):20-24
[11]	Liu Shirong, Li Xuemin, Niu Limin.The degradation of soil fertility in pure larch plantations in the northeastern part of China[J]. Ecological Engineering,1998,10:75-86
[12]	陈立新,肖洋.大兴安岭落叶松林地不同发育阶段土壤肥力演变与评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2006,4(5):50-55
[13]	陈立新,陈祥伟,段文标.落叶松人工林凋落物与土壤肥力变化的研究[J]. 应用生态学报,1998, 9(6):581-586
[14]	闫德仁.落叶松人工林土壤肥力变化的研究[J]. 生态学杂志,1993,12(3):8-10
[15]	闫德仁,刘永军,张幼军.落叶松人工林土壤养分动态[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2003,31(3):16-18
[16]	闫德仁,王晶莹,杨茂仁.落叶松人工林土壤衰退趋势[J]. 生态学杂志,1997,16(2):62-66
[17]	Yang Kai, Zhu Jiaojun, Yan Qiaoling. Changes in soil P chemistry as affected by conversion of natural secondary forests to larch plantations [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2010,260:422-428
[18]	孙晓梅,张守攻,祁万宜,等.北亚热带高山区日本落叶松造林整地与抚育技术的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007,20 (2):235-240
[19]	陈琦,尹粉粉,曹靖,等.秦岭西部不同发育阶段油松和日本落叶松人工林土壤酶活性变化和分布特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(5):466-471
[20]	杨鑫,曹靖,懂茂星,等.外来树种日本落叶松对森林土壤质量及细菌多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2008,19(10):2109-2116
[21]	国家林业局.中华人民共和国林业行业标准:森林土壤分析方法[M]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1999
[22]	北京林业大学.土壤学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1982:132-134
[23]	陈立新.落叶松人工林土壤酸度与有机磷形态的相关性[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(11):2842-2847
[24]	陈立新,段文标,乔璐.落叶松人工林根际与非根际土壤养分特征及酸度研究[J]. 水土保持科学,2011,25(3):131-135
[25]	王海燕,雷相东,陆元昌,等.海南4种典型林分土壤化学性质比较研究[J].林业科学研究, 2009, 22(1):129-133
[26]	王丹,戴伟,王兵,等.杉木人工林不同发育阶段土壤性质变化的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2010,32(3):59-63
[27]	袁颖红,樊后保,黄荣珍,等.连续年龄序列桉树人工林土壤微量元素含量及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报,2009,18(1): 268-273
[28]	徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2002:54-68
[29]	陈喜全,郭秋慧,王政权.落叶松纯林与落叶松胡桃楸混交林下土壤理化性质的研究[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1991,19(专刊):258-274
[30]	李国雷,刘勇,李瑞生,等.油松人工林土壤质量的演变[J]. 林业科学,2008,44(9):76-81
[31]	Burke D J, Weintraub M N, Hewins C R, et al. Relationship between soil enzyme activities, nutrient cycling and soil fungal communities in a northern hardwood forest[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2011,43:795-803
[32]	张昌顺,李昆.人工林地力的衰退与维护研究综述[J]. 世界林业研究,2005,18(1):17-21
[33]	王洪君,宫芳,郑宝仁,等.落叶松人工林的土壤理化性质[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1997,25(3):75-79
[34]	胡亚林,曾德慧,汪思龙,等.管理措施对人工林土壤质量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2007,26(11):1828-1834
[35]	赵其国.中国东部红壤地区土壤退化的时空变化、机理及调控[M].北京:中国科学出版社,2002:38-48
[36]	王燕,刘苑秋,曾炳生,等.江西大岗山常绿阔叶林土壤养分特征研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2010,32(1) :96-100
[37]	Moore T R, Trofymow J A, Taylor B, et al. Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests[J]. Global Change Biology,1999,5:75-82
[38]	郭剑芬,杨玉盛,陈光水,等.森林凋落物分解研究进展[J]. 林业科学,2006,42(4):94-100
[39]	Jacob M, Weland N, Platner C, et al. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf litter of temperate deciduous forest trees along a gradient of increasing tree species diversity[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2009,41:2122-2130
[40]	张鼎华,叶章发,范必有,等.抚育间伐对人工林土壤肥力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2001,12(5):672-676
[41]	林娜,刘勇,李国雷,等.抚育间伐对人工林凋落物分解的影响[J]. 世界林业研究,2010,23(3):44-47
[42]	雷相东,陆元昌,张会儒,等.抚育间伐对落叶松云冷杉混交林的影响[J]. 林业科学,2005,41(4):80-85
[43]	Inagaki Y, Kuramoto S, Torii A, et al. Effects of thinning on leaf-fall and leaf-litter nitrogen concentration in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endlicher) plantation stands in Japan[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255:1859-1867

Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties at Different Developmental Stages of Larix kaempferi Plantations in Xiaolongshan, Gansu Province

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties at Different Developmental Stages of Larix kaempferi Plantations in Xiaolongshan, Gansu Province

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content