Comparison and Analysis of Using Goal Programming and Rotation Cutting Formulas to Determine Forest Harvest

LI Ting-ting; LU Yuan-chang; LIU Xian-zhao; WANG Xia; PANG Li-feng

Based the forest resource inventory data of Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, the annual cut of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) and Chinese-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) timber forests were calculated by multi-goal programming and traditional rotation cutting formulas separately, and the different results for the same management period (2009-2019) from these two approaches were discussed. It shows that the harvest is generally larger by rotation cutting formulas, and the annual economic benefits of unit area by goal programming is 10-20 times that by rotation cutting formulas. Application of goal programming in forest harvest can regulate forest structure for normal forest, make forest better and achieve the maximum timber harvest and production and maximum net present value.

1. Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

2. Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2013-02-15

Abstract: Based the forest resource inventory data of Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, the annual cut of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) and Chinese-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) timber forests were calculated by multi-goal programming and traditional rotation cutting formulas separately, and the different results for the same management period (2009-2019) from these two approaches were discussed. It shows that the harvest is generally larger by rotation cutting formulas, and the annual economic benefits of unit area by goal programming is 10-20 times that by rotation cutting formulas. Application of goal programming in forest harvest can regulate forest structure for normal forest, make forest better and achieve the maximum timber harvest and production and maximum net present value.

HTML

Reference (13)

[1]	Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C. Modelling timber harvest scheduling problems with multiple criteria: An application in Spain[J]. Forest Sci, 1998, 44: 47-57
[2]	Bertomeu M, Diaz-Balteiro L, Gimenez J C. Forest management optimization in Eucalyptus plantations: a goal programming approach[J]. Can J For Res, 2009, 39:356-366
[3]	Misir N, Misir M. Developing a Multi-Objective Forest Planning Process with Goal Programming: A Case Study[J]. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2007, 10(3):514-522
[4]	陈增丰. 目标规划和线性规划两步优化法在森林收获调整中的应用[J].福建林学院学报, 1994, 14(4): 329-338
[5]	谢金星, 薛毅. 优化建模与LINDO/LINGO软件[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2005:322-333
[6]	陈伯贤. 森林资源管理中线性规划和目标规划联合应用的研究[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1991, 19(2):36-41
[7]	刘伟, 黄家荣, 阚龙攀, 等. 人工刺槐用材林多目标规划收获调整[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(6):2491-2496
[8]	张贤良. 多目标决策法在生态公益林资源优化配置中的应用研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2002(6):31-34
[9]	戎建涛, 雷相东, 张会儒, 等. 兼顾碳贮量和木材生产目标的森林经营规划研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(2):155-162
[10]	Baskent E Z, Keles S. Developing alternative wood harvesting strategies with linar programming in preparing forest management plans[J]. Turk J Agric For, 2006, 30:67-79
[11]	Baskent E Z, Keles S. Developing alternative forest management planning strategies incorporating timber, water and carbon values: an examination of their interactions[J]. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2009, 14(4): 467-480
[12]	亢新刚. 森林资源经营管理[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2001:213-225
[13]	白灵海, 唐继新, 明安刚, 等. 广西大青山米老排人工林经济效益分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(6):784-787

Comparison and Analysis of Using Goal Programming and Rotation Cutting Formulas to Determine Forest Harvest

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views