• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊（CJCR）
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖
Volume 27 Issue 3
. 
Article Contents
Turn off MathJax
Article Navigation >  Forest Research  > 2014 >  27(3): 410-416

Citation:
shu

Study of Litter Layers’ Water Retention Capacity under Different Forest Communities in the Lashi Lake Catchment, Lijiang City, Yunnan Province, China

  • 1.

    Yunnan Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China

  • 2.

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China

  • 3.

    Research Institute of Resources Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China

  • Received Date: 2013-07-23
  • The volumes and water retention capacity of the litter layers under six forest communities in the Lashi Lake Catchment, Li Jiang City, Yunnan Province were measured. The result showed that Quercus pannosa forest had the highest litter volume (22.45 t·hm-2); and the Pinus yunnanensis forest had the lowest (6.54 t·hm-2). For all the six forest types, the litter volumes of decomposed and semi-decomposed layers were generally higher than that of the un-decomposed layer. The same was true for water retention capacity except the Populus yunnanensis forest, which was in descending order the Quercus pannosa forest, the Picea likiangensis forest, the Pinus yunnanensis+Quercus pannosa+rhododendron mixed forest, the Quercus aquifolioides forest, the Populus yunnanensis forest and the Pinus yunnanensis forest. The water absorption rates of litter would gradually decrease over waterlogging time. And the processes would significantly slowdown after 2-4 hours and eventually reach saturation. The water absorption rates and water storage capacity of the decomposed and semi-decomposed layers were also larger than that of the un-decomposed layer. The water storage capacities of litter layer of the six forests were in the order from high to low: the Quercus pannosa forest, the Picea likiangensis forest, the Pinus yunnanensis+Quercus pannosa+rhododendron mixed forest, the Quercus aquifolioides forest, the Populus yunnanensis forest and the Pinus yunnanensis forest. And their depths of rainfall storage were respectively 6.70, 4.12, 3.68, 3.30, 2.12 and 1.66 mm.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 白军红.中国高原湿地[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2008
    [2] 张 彪,李文华,谢高地,等.北京市森林生态系统的水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2008, 28 (11):5619-5624
    [3] 田 超,杨新兵,李 军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):221-226
    [4] 王 波,张洪江,徐丽君,等.四周边山地不同人工林枯落物储量及其持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(4):90-94
    [5] 韩春华,赵雨森,辛 颖,等.阿什河上游小流域主要林分枯落物层的持水特性[J].林业科学研究,2012,25(2):212-217
    [6] 肖德荣,田 昆,张利权.滇西北高原纳帕海湿地植物多样性与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):3116-3124
    [7] 李宁云,袁 华,田 昆,等.滇西北纳帕海湿地景观格局变化及其对土壤碳库的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7388-7396
    [8] 陈小勇,杨君兴,陈自明,等.丽江拉市海保护区的鱼类区系和现存状态[J].动物学研究,2003,24(2):144-147
    [9] 刘小葛,刘 婧,张 文,等.拉市海灰鹤越冬后期的日活动行为时间分配及食性分析[J].西部林业科学,2009,38(3):76-80
    [10] 胡圆圆,林 萍,肖德荣,等.丽江拉市海高原湿地水生植被调查与分析[J].山东林业科技,2008(1):1-5
    [11] 李仲安.丽江拉市海区域地质构造对调蓄水工程的影响分析[J].陕西水利,2011(2):71-72
    [12] 魏晓霞,李 良,孙 旭,等.塞罕坝地区几种林下枯落物持水特性研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2010,31(3):41-45
    [13] 王登芝,向星政,聂立水.北京西山不同人工林枯落物层的水化学性质[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(11):263-264
    [14] 贾志军,王 富,甄宝艳,等.不同生态修复措施下桃林口水库水源涵养区枯落物的蓄水保水效益[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):136-139
    [15] 林 波,刘 庆,吴 彦,等.亚高山针叶林人工恢复过程中凋落物动态分析[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(9):1491-1496
    [16] 刘延惠,王彦辉,于鹏涛,等.六盘山主要植被类型的生物量及其分配[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(4):443-452
    [17] 陆 梅,田 昆,赖建东,等.高原湿地纳帕海周边山地不同植被类型枯落物持水特性[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):28-34
    [18] 宋庆丰,杨新兵,张金柱,等.森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J].生态环境学报,2009, 18(6):2316-2320
    [19] 丁绍兰,杨乔媚,赵串串,等.黄土丘陵区不同林分类型枯落物层及其林下土壤持水能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):104-108
    [20] 薛 立,何跃君,屈 明,等.华南典型人工林凋落物的持水特性[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(3):415-421
    [21] 张洪江,程金花,余新晓,等.贡嘎山冷杉纯林枯落物储量及其持水特性[J].林业科学,2003,39(5):147-151
    [22] 马书国,杨玉盛,谢锦升,等. 亚热带6种老龄天然林及杉木人工林的枯落物持水性能[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2010,5(2):31-38
    [23] 吕 刚,曹小平,卢 慧,等.辽西海棠山森林枯落物持水与土壤贮水能力研究[J],水土保持学报,2010, 24(3):203-208
    [24] 赵鸿雁,吴钦孝.黄土高原几种枯枝落叶吸水机理研究[J].防护林科技,1996(4):15-18
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Get Citation
PDF
XML

Article views(3030) PDF downloads(1213) Cited by()

Proportional views

Study of Litter Layers’ Water Retention Capacity under Different Forest Communities in the Lashi Lake Catchment, Lijiang City, Yunnan Province, China

  • 1. Yunnan Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
  • 2. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
  • 3. Research Institute of Resources Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
  • Received Date: 2013-07-23

Abstract: The volumes and water retention capacity of the litter layers under six forest communities in the Lashi Lake Catchment, Li Jiang City, Yunnan Province were measured. The result showed that Quercus pannosa forest had the highest litter volume (22.45 t·hm-2); and the Pinus yunnanensis forest had the lowest (6.54 t·hm-2). For all the six forest types, the litter volumes of decomposed and semi-decomposed layers were generally higher than that of the un-decomposed layer. The same was true for water retention capacity except the Populus yunnanensis forest, which was in descending order the Quercus pannosa forest, the Picea likiangensis forest, the Pinus yunnanensis+Quercus pannosa+rhododendron mixed forest, the Quercus aquifolioides forest, the Populus yunnanensis forest and the Pinus yunnanensis forest. The water absorption rates of litter would gradually decrease over waterlogging time. And the processes would significantly slowdown after 2-4 hours and eventually reach saturation. The water absorption rates and water storage capacity of the decomposed and semi-decomposed layers were also larger than that of the un-decomposed layer. The water storage capacities of litter layer of the six forests were in the order from high to low: the Quercus pannosa forest, the Picea likiangensis forest, the Pinus yunnanensis+Quercus pannosa+rhododendron mixed forest, the Quercus aquifolioides forest, the Populus yunnanensis forest and the Pinus yunnanensis forest. And their depths of rainfall storage were respectively 6.70, 4.12, 3.68, 3.30, 2.12 and 1.66 mm.

    HTML

Reference (24)

Catalog

    京ICP备09064894号-3

    Copyright：《Forest Research》Editorial Office

    Address：Chinese Academy of Forestry after Beijing Wanshou MountainTel：010-62889680；62889702Email：lykxyj@caf.ac.cn

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return