Biomass Allocation of Different Species Plantations in Subtropical Area of China

ZHENG Lu; CAI Dao-xiong; LU Li-hua; MING An-gang; YU Hao-long; LI Zhong-guo

Volume 27 Issue 4

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2014 > 27(4): 454-458

Citation:

Biomass Allocation of Different Species Plantations in Subtropical Area of China

1.
Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Pingxiang 532600, Guangxi, China
2.
Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Pingxiang 532600, Guangxi, China

Received Date: 2013-09-04

Abstract

The allocation patterns of biomass in five plantations were studied by harvesting method and established allometric equations in subtropical area of south China. The results showed that the biomass of different species plantations were quite different in the same circumstances such as similar site conditions, age and management measures, showing that Mytilaria laosensis stand (404.95 t·hm-2) > Michelia macclurei stand (376.61 t·hm-2) > Pinus massoniana stand (239.94 t·hm-2) > Castanopsis hystrix stand (231.01 t·hm-2) > Mesua ferrea stand (181.06 t·hm-2). The biomass spatial pattern dominated by tree layer, which accounted for 87.71%-97.86%, followed by the litter layer, accounting for 1.96%-10.90%, shrub and herb layers were the minimum, accounting for only 0.02%-1.09%. The organ biomass pattern of tree layer showed that proportion of stem biomass was the largest, followed by the root's or branch's, and then followed by the bark's, the lowest was the leaf's overall. The biomasses of shrub layer, herb layer, and floor litter among different stands were quite different. C. hystrix stand and P. massoniana stand had higher biomass of shrub layer, Mytilaria laosensis stand and Michelia macclurei stand were lower, Mesua ferrea stand was the lowest. The biomasses of herb layer and floor litter showed a similar law, that of P. massoniana stand was the highest, C. hystrix secondly, Mytilaria laosensis stand, Michelia macclurei stand and Mesua ferrea stand were lower.
- south subtropical area,
- plantation,
- biomass,
- spatial distribution

References

[1]	冯宗炜,王效科,吴刚.中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力[M].北京:科学出版社,1999
[2]	Anderson N, Jones J G, Page-Dumroese D, et al. A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass[J]. Energies, 2013, 6(1):164-183
[3]	Qiu S, Bell R W, Hobbs R J, et al. Estimating nutrient budgets for prescribed thinning in a regrowth eucalyptus forest in south-west Australia[J]. Forestry, 2012, 85(1):51-61
[4]	Aherne J, Posch M, Forsius M, et al. Impacts of forest biomass removal on soil nutrient status under climate change: a catchment-based modelling study for Finland[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 107(1):471-488
[5]	Coomes D A, Holdaway R J, Kobe R K, et al. A general integrative framework for modelling woody biomass production and carbon sequestration rates in forests[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(1):42-64
[6]	Zhang C, Ju W, Chen J M, et al. China's forest biomass carbon sink based on seven inventories from 1973 to 2008[J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 118(3-4):933-948
[7]	陈炳浩,陈楚莹. 沙地红皮云杉森林群落生物量和生产力的初步研究[J]. 林业科学,1980,16(4):269-278
[8]	冯宗炜,陈楚莹,张家武,等. 湖南会同地区马尾松林生物量的测定[J]. 林业科学,1982,18(2):127-134
[9]	李意德,曾庆波,吴仲民,等. 尖峰岭热带山地雨林生物量的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报,1992, 16(4): 293-300
[10]	任海,彭少麟,向言词. 鹤山马占相思人工林的生物量和净初级生产力[J]. 植物生态学报,2000,24(1): 18-21
[11]	王洪岩,王文杰,邱岭,等. 兴安落叶松林生物量,地表枯落物量及土壤有机碳储量随林分生长的变化差异[J]. 生态学报,2012, 32(3): 833-843
[12]	赵敏. 中国主要森林生态系统碳储量和碳收支评估[D]. 北京: 中国科学院植物研究所,2004
[13]	方精云,郭兆迪,朴世龙,等. 1981-2000 年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J]. 中国科学: D 辑,2007, 37(6): 804-812
[14]	刘庆,尹华军,程新颖,等. 中国人工林生态系统的可持续更新问题与对策[J]. 世界林业研究,2010,23(1): 71- 75
[15]	马泽清,王辉民,王绍强,等. 雨雪冰冻灾害对中亚热带人工林的影响——以江西省千烟洲为例[J]. 植物生态学报,2010, 34(2): 204-212
[16]	康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等. 南亚热带杉木生态系统生物量和碳素积累及其空间分布特征[J]. 林业科学,2009, 45(8): 147-153
[17]	明安刚,贾宏炎,陶怡,等. 桂西南28年生米老排人工林生物量及其分配特征[J]. 生态学杂志,2012, 31(5): 1050 -1056
[18]	覃林,何友均,李智勇,等. 南亚热带红椎马尾松纯林及其混交林生物量和生产力分配格局[J]. 林业科学,2011, 47(12): 17-21
[19]	赵凯. 福建柏火力楠人工纯林及其混交林碳储量的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2010
[20]	齐之尧,马家禧,李顺明. 火力楠人工林生物量、生产力的研究[J]. 生态学杂志,1985, 4(2):17-30
[21]	张治军. 广西造林再造林固碳成本效益研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2009
[22]	唐罗忠,刘志龙,虞木奎,等. 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林地上部分养分的积累和分配[J]. 植物生态学报,2010, 34(6): 661-670
[23]	程瑞梅,封晓辉,肖文发, 等. 北亚热带马尾松净生产力对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(8): 2086-2095
[24]	宋曰钦,翟明普,贾黎明. 不同树龄三倍体毛白杨生物量分布规律[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2010,38(1):1-3
[25]	刘延惠,王彦辉,于澎涛,等. 六盘山主要植被类型的生物量及其分配[J]. 林业科学研究,2011,24(4):443-452
[26]	Enquist B J, Niklas K J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants[J]. Science, 2002, 295(5559):1517-1520
[27]	马维玲,石培礼,李文华,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸植株性状和生物量分配的海拔梯度变异[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学,2010,40(6):533-543
[28]	McCarthy M C, Enquist B J. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation[J]. Functional Ecology, 2007, 21(4): 713-720
[29]	方江平. 西藏南伊沟林芝云杉林生物量与生产力研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2012,25(5):582-589

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3102) PDF downloads(1293) Cited by()

Proportional views

Biomass Allocation of Different Species Plantations in Subtropical Area of China

1. Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Pingxiang 532600, Guangxi, China

2. Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Pingxiang 532600, Guangxi, China

Received Date: 2013-09-04

Abstract: The allocation patterns of biomass in five plantations were studied by harvesting method and established allometric equations in subtropical area of south China. The results showed that the biomass of different species plantations were quite different in the same circumstances such as similar site conditions, age and management measures, showing that Mytilaria laosensis stand (404.95 t·hm-2) > Michelia macclurei stand (376.61 t·hm-2) > Pinus massoniana stand (239.94 t·hm-2) > Castanopsis hystrix stand (231.01 t·hm-2) > Mesua ferrea stand (181.06 t·hm-2). The biomass spatial pattern dominated by tree layer, which accounted for 87.71%-97.86%, followed by the litter layer, accounting for 1.96%-10.90%, shrub and herb layers were the minimum, accounting for only 0.02%-1.09%. The organ biomass pattern of tree layer showed that proportion of stem biomass was the largest, followed by the root's or branch's, and then followed by the bark's, the lowest was the leaf's overall. The biomasses of shrub layer, herb layer, and floor litter among different stands were quite different. C. hystrix stand and P. massoniana stand had higher biomass of shrub layer, Mytilaria laosensis stand and Michelia macclurei stand were lower, Mesua ferrea stand was the lowest. The biomasses of herb layer and floor litter showed a similar law, that of P. massoniana stand was the highest, C. hystrix secondly, Mytilaria laosensis stand, Michelia macclurei stand and Mesua ferrea stand were lower.

HTML

Reference (29)

[1]	冯宗炜,王效科,吴刚.中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力[M].北京:科学出版社,1999
[2]	Anderson N, Jones J G, Page-Dumroese D, et al. A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass[J]. Energies, 2013, 6(1):164-183
[3]	Qiu S, Bell R W, Hobbs R J, et al. Estimating nutrient budgets for prescribed thinning in a regrowth eucalyptus forest in south-west Australia[J]. Forestry, 2012, 85(1):51-61
[4]	Aherne J, Posch M, Forsius M, et al. Impacts of forest biomass removal on soil nutrient status under climate change: a catchment-based modelling study for Finland[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 107(1):471-488
[5]	Coomes D A, Holdaway R J, Kobe R K, et al. A general integrative framework for modelling woody biomass production and carbon sequestration rates in forests[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(1):42-64
[6]	Zhang C, Ju W, Chen J M, et al. China's forest biomass carbon sink based on seven inventories from 1973 to 2008[J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 118(3-4):933-948
[7]	陈炳浩,陈楚莹. 沙地红皮云杉森林群落生物量和生产力的初步研究[J]. 林业科学,1980,16(4):269-278
[8]	冯宗炜,陈楚莹,张家武,等. 湖南会同地区马尾松林生物量的测定[J]. 林业科学,1982,18(2):127-134
[9]	李意德,曾庆波,吴仲民,等. 尖峰岭热带山地雨林生物量的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报,1992, 16(4): 293-300
[10]	任海,彭少麟,向言词. 鹤山马占相思人工林的生物量和净初级生产力[J]. 植物生态学报,2000,24(1): 18-21
[11]	王洪岩,王文杰,邱岭,等. 兴安落叶松林生物量,地表枯落物量及土壤有机碳储量随林分生长的变化差异[J]. 生态学报,2012, 32(3): 833-843
[12]	赵敏. 中国主要森林生态系统碳储量和碳收支评估[D]. 北京: 中国科学院植物研究所,2004
[13]	方精云,郭兆迪,朴世龙,等. 1981-2000 年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J]. 中国科学: D 辑,2007, 37(6): 804-812
[14]	刘庆,尹华军,程新颖,等. 中国人工林生态系统的可持续更新问题与对策[J]. 世界林业研究,2010,23(1): 71- 75
[15]	马泽清,王辉民,王绍强,等. 雨雪冰冻灾害对中亚热带人工林的影响——以江西省千烟洲为例[J]. 植物生态学报,2010, 34(2): 204-212
[16]	康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等. 南亚热带杉木生态系统生物量和碳素积累及其空间分布特征[J]. 林业科学,2009, 45(8): 147-153
[17]	明安刚,贾宏炎,陶怡,等. 桂西南28年生米老排人工林生物量及其分配特征[J]. 生态学杂志,2012, 31(5): 1050 -1056
[18]	覃林,何友均,李智勇,等. 南亚热带红椎马尾松纯林及其混交林生物量和生产力分配格局[J]. 林业科学,2011, 47(12): 17-21
[19]	赵凯. 福建柏火力楠人工纯林及其混交林碳储量的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2010
[20]	齐之尧,马家禧,李顺明. 火力楠人工林生物量、生产力的研究[J]. 生态学杂志,1985, 4(2):17-30
[21]	张治军. 广西造林再造林固碳成本效益研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2009
[22]	唐罗忠,刘志龙,虞木奎,等. 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林地上部分养分的积累和分配[J]. 植物生态学报,2010, 34(6): 661-670
[23]	程瑞梅,封晓辉,肖文发, 等. 北亚热带马尾松净生产力对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(8): 2086-2095
[24]	宋曰钦,翟明普,贾黎明. 不同树龄三倍体毛白杨生物量分布规律[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2010,38(1):1-3
[25]	刘延惠,王彦辉,于澎涛,等. 六盘山主要植被类型的生物量及其分配[J]. 林业科学研究,2011,24(4):443-452
[26]	Enquist B J, Niklas K J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants[J]. Science, 2002, 295(5559):1517-1520
[27]	马维玲,石培礼,李文华,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸植株性状和生物量分配的海拔梯度变异[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学,2010,40(6):533-543
[28]	McCarthy M C, Enquist B J. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation[J]. Functional Ecology, 2007, 21(4): 713-720
[29]	方江平. 西藏南伊沟林芝云杉林生物量与生产力研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2012,25(5):582-589

Biomass Allocation of Different Species Plantations in Subtropical Area of China

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Biomass Allocation of Different Species Plantations in Subtropical Area of China

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content