Evaluation and Analysis of Landscaping Value of Wild Species Based on AHP’s Programming and KBE Technology

JIANG Shu-lei; LI Guo-song; WANG Min; WANG Yin-xiao; ZHANG Li-bin; LU Meng-zhu

Volume 27 Issue 4

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2014 > 27(4): 521-528

Citation:

Evaluation and Analysis of Landscaping Value of Wild Species Based on AHP’s Programming and KBE Technology

1.
State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2.
Forestry Seedling and Cutting Management Center of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050091, Hebei, China
3.
Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China

Received Date: 2012-08-30

Abstract

472 wild tree species were identified in Hebei's tree germplasm resources survey and 98 of which were considered as the species with landscaping value. According to Analytic Hierarchy Process, the program modules were created, and the weights about the indicators at all levels of landscaping value were fixed. With the census data of tree germplasm resources of Hebei province and using Knowledge Based Engineering technology, the composite weight of each wild species was got then the cluster analysis was carried, the composite weight were classified.
- value of landscaping plant,
- wild Species,
- AHP,
- KBE

References

[1]	谢云. 浙江红山茶遗传多样性分析及观赏价值评价[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2011:49-167
[2]	卢高峰.重庆中梁山海石公园九种野生观赏植物物候分析及野生植物观赏价值等级评价体系研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2011:17-45
[3]	吴广民,隋秀荣.牡丹江地区野生槭树科植物及其园林价值的研究[J].林业勘查设计,2000(2) :59-60
[4]	谷颐.吉林省野生地被植物资源及园林应用价值研究[J].北方园艺,2006( 3) :105-106
[5]	Saaty T. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures[J]. Journal of mathematical psychology, 1977,15(3), 234-281
[6]	Seçme N Y, Bayrakdaroglu A, Kahraman C. Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(9), 11699-11709
[7]	IçY T, Yurdakul M. Development of a decision support system for machining center selection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(2, Part 2): 3505-3513
[8]	Şen C G, Çlnar G. Evaluation and pre-allocation of operators with multiple skills: A combined fuzzy AHP and max-min approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(3):2043-2053
[9]	Vidal L A , Sahin E , Martelli N,et al. Applying AHP to select drugs to be produced by anticipation in a chemotherapy compounding unit[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(2): 1528-1534
[10]	Cebeci U. Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(5): 8900-8909
[11]	Liu C C, Chen S Y. Prioritization of digital capital measures in recruiting website for the national armed forces[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(5): 9415-9421
[12]	Hsu Y L, Lee C H, Kreng V B. The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(1), 419-425
[13]	Amiri M , Zandieh M , Soltani R, et al. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(10): 12314-12322
[14]	Dagdeviren M, Yavuz S, KilIn N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(4), 8143-8151
[15]	Naghadehi M Z, Mikaeil R , Ataei M . The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(4), 8218-8226
[16]	Niaraki A S , Kim K. Ontology based personalized route planning system using a multi-criteria decision making approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(2), 2250-2259
[17]	李国松,杨柳青.虚拟现实技术在风景园林规划与设计中的应用研究—几种常见虚拟现实技术的应用分析评价[J].中国园林,2008(2):32-36
[18]	王文元,史国旭,周文强,等.熵AHP法对鸢尾宿根花卉的综合评价[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(16) :292-298
[19]	汪小飞,关玉梅,等.运用层次分析法(AHP)对室内观叶植物的评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(32) :19898-19900,19903
[20]	黄启堂,游水生,黄榕辉,等.运用层次分析法评价木质藤本观赏植物资源[J].福建林学院学报,1997,17(3) :269-272
[21]	任建武,白伟岚,姚洪军.野生园林植物筛选技术方法研究[J].中国园林,2012(2):18-22
[22]	王印肖,李国松.河北省林木种质资源普查成果初报[J].河北林业,2008(5):32-35
[23]	Hsu Y Y, Tai P H, Wang M W, et al. A knowledge-based engineering system for assembly sequence planning[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011,55: 763-782
[24]	余建英,何旭宏.数据统计分析与SPSS应用[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2003:45-49
[25]	陈平,吴诚鸥,刘应安,等.应用数理统计[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2008:23-27

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(2809) PDF downloads(834) Cited by()

Proportional views

Evaluation and Analysis of Landscaping Value of Wild Species Based on AHP’s Programming and KBE Technology

1. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

2. Forestry Seedling and Cutting Management Center of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050091, Hebei, China

3. Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China

Received Date: 2012-08-30

Abstract: 472 wild tree species were identified in Hebei's tree germplasm resources survey and 98 of which were considered as the species with landscaping value. According to Analytic Hierarchy Process, the program modules were created, and the weights about the indicators at all levels of landscaping value were fixed. With the census data of tree germplasm resources of Hebei province and using Knowledge Based Engineering technology, the composite weight of each wild species was got then the cluster analysis was carried, the composite weight were classified.

HTML

Reference (25)

[1]	谢云. 浙江红山茶遗传多样性分析及观赏价值评价[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2011:49-167
[2]	卢高峰.重庆中梁山海石公园九种野生观赏植物物候分析及野生植物观赏价值等级评价体系研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2011:17-45
[3]	吴广民,隋秀荣.牡丹江地区野生槭树科植物及其园林价值的研究[J].林业勘查设计,2000(2) :59-60
[4]	谷颐.吉林省野生地被植物资源及园林应用价值研究[J].北方园艺,2006( 3) :105-106
[5]	Saaty T. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures[J]. Journal of mathematical psychology, 1977,15(3), 234-281
[6]	Seçme N Y, Bayrakdaroglu A, Kahraman C. Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(9), 11699-11709
[7]	IçY T, Yurdakul M. Development of a decision support system for machining center selection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(2, Part 2): 3505-3513
[8]	Şen C G, Çlnar G. Evaluation and pre-allocation of operators with multiple skills: A combined fuzzy AHP and max-min approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(3):2043-2053
[9]	Vidal L A , Sahin E , Martelli N,et al. Applying AHP to select drugs to be produced by anticipation in a chemotherapy compounding unit[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(2): 1528-1534
[10]	Cebeci U. Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(5): 8900-8909
[11]	Liu C C, Chen S Y. Prioritization of digital capital measures in recruiting website for the national armed forces[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(5): 9415-9421
[12]	Hsu Y L, Lee C H, Kreng V B. The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(1), 419-425
[13]	Amiri M , Zandieh M , Soltani R, et al. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(10): 12314-12322
[14]	Dagdeviren M, Yavuz S, KilIn N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(4), 8143-8151
[15]	Naghadehi M Z, Mikaeil R , Ataei M . The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(4), 8218-8226
[16]	Niaraki A S , Kim K. Ontology based personalized route planning system using a multi-criteria decision making approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(2), 2250-2259
[17]	李国松,杨柳青.虚拟现实技术在风景园林规划与设计中的应用研究—几种常见虚拟现实技术的应用分析评价[J].中国园林,2008(2):32-36
[18]	王文元,史国旭,周文强,等.熵AHP法对鸢尾宿根花卉的综合评价[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(16) :292-298
[19]	汪小飞,关玉梅,等.运用层次分析法(AHP)对室内观叶植物的评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(32) :19898-19900,19903
[20]	黄启堂,游水生,黄榕辉,等.运用层次分析法评价木质藤本观赏植物资源[J].福建林学院学报,1997,17(3) :269-272
[21]	任建武,白伟岚,姚洪军.野生园林植物筛选技术方法研究[J].中国园林,2012(2):18-22
[22]	王印肖,李国松.河北省林木种质资源普查成果初报[J].河北林业,2008(5):32-35
[23]	Hsu Y Y, Tai P H, Wang M W, et al. A knowledge-based engineering system for assembly sequence planning[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011,55: 763-782
[24]	余建英,何旭宏.数据统计分析与SPSS应用[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2003:45-49
[25]	陈平,吴诚鸥,刘应安,等.应用数理统计[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2008:23-27

Evaluation and Analysis of Landscaping Value of Wild Species Based on AHP’s Programming and KBE Technology

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Evaluation and Analysis of Landscaping Value of Wild Species Based on AHP’s Programming and KBE Technology

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content