Observation and Comparison of Flowering Phenology of Different Carya illinoensis Clones

CHEN Fen; YAO Xiao-hua; GAO Huan-zhang; CHANG Jun; WANG Kai-liang; Liu Qu

Volume 28 Issue 2

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2015 > 28(2): 209-216

Citation:

Observation and Comparison of Flowering Phenology of Different Carya illinoensis Clones

1.
Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang 311400, Zhejiang, China
2.
Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, China

Received Date: 2014-05-29

Abstract

Flowering phenology of thirty-two Carya illinoensis clones was observed and compared. The results showed that there exited some differences in flowering phonological phase from 2011 to 2014 and the duration of blossom process of all the thirty-two clones was from April 24 to May 21 in 2013. The lasting days of male flower of the thirty-two clones were 11-18 days and the whole flowering period of female flower were 9-17 days in 2013. The duration of receptivity stage of female flower and pollen shedding stage of male flower of thirty-two clones were all 3-8 days. According to the time order of blossom of male and female flowers, sixteen clones could be determined as protogynous type, ten clones were protandrous type and six clones the homogamic type. Eighty-six feasible pollination combinations could be selected according to the observation results. The best configuration scheme of clones was proposed. No significant difference was found in the length of male inflorescence among the thirty-two clones, but the differences among the clusters of male flower in a single branch, the number of pollen sac in a single male inflorescence, the total number of male inflorescence per plant, numbers of female flower per branch, numbers of male inflorescence per cluster and numbers of female flower per plant reached a significant level. The range of whole variation in the total number of male inflorescence per plant was the biggest, the coefficient of variation was 75.51%.
- Carya illinoensis,
- flowering phenology,
- pollination combination,
- flowers comparison

References

[1]	胡芳名,谭晓风,刘惠民,等. 中国主要经济树种栽培与利用[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006: 66-71.
[2]	姚小华,王开良,任华东,等. 薄壳山核桃优新品种和无性系开花物候特性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2004,26(5): 675-680.
[3]	张日清,吕芳德. 优良经济树种——美国山核桃[J]. 广西林业科学,1998,27(4): 202-206.
[4]	张日清,吕芳德. 美国山核桃在原产地分布、引种栽培区划及主要栽培品种分类研究概述[J]. 经济林研究, 2002,20(3): 53-55.
[5]	吴国良,陈丽霞,段良骅,等. 美国山核桃[J]. 山西果树, 2005,1(1):35-36.
[6]	侯冬培,习学良,石卓功. 我国薄壳山核桃研究概况[J]. 山东林业科技, 2007(4): 53-55.
[7]	贾晓东,王涛,张计育,等. 美国山核桃研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2012,28(4):74-78.
[8]	Polito V S,Pinney K. The relationship between phenology of pistillate flower organogenesis and mode of heterodichogamy in Juglans regia L. (Juglandaceae) [J]. Sexual Plant Reprod,1997,10(1):36-39.
[9]	Ares A, Reid W,Brauer D. Production and economics of native pecan silvopastures in central United States[J]. Agroforestry Systems,2006,66(3):205-215.
[10]	李俊南,李莲芳,熊新武,等. 薄壳山核桃无性繁殖技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(33): 16226-16228.
[11]	夏根清,翁春余,王开良, 等. 薄壳山核桃嫁接技术试验[J]. 经济林研究,2007,25(4): 109-112.
[12]	常君,姚小华,杨水平,等. 美国山核桃不同品种接穗对嫁接苗木根系生长发育影响的研究[J]. 西南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 29(10): 104-108.
[13]	常君,姚小华,王开良,等. 不同无性系美国山核桃种子对其苗木根系生长影响的研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 34(1): 109-114.
[14]	杨建华,习学良,范志远,等. 不同美国山核桃品种的发芽及开花习性研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2008,37(1): 87-90.
[15]	李川,姚小华,王开良,等. 12个薄壳山核桃无性系果(核)性状以及产量的比较[J] . 西南大学学报: 自然科学版,2011,33( 6) : 40-44.
[16]	莫正海,张计育,翟敏,等. 薄壳山核桃在南京的开花物候期观察和比较[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2013, 22 (1):57-62.
[17]	姚小华. 山核桃高效栽培技术[M]. 北京: 金盾出版社,2012.
[18]	常君,李川,王开良,等. 薄壳山核桃无性系开花物候特性观测[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2012,34(4): 730-735.
[19]	李雪,徐迎春,李永荣,等. 薄壳山核桃不同品系开花物候期特性观测[J]. 江苏林业科技,2012,37(6): 19-21.
[20]	房瑶瑶,陈兴彬,杨克强,等. 核桃实生群体物候的观测[J]. 经济林研究,2011,(3):98-101.
[21]	李永荣,吴文龙,刘永芝. 薄壳山核桃种质资源的开发利用[J]. 安徽农业科学,2009,37(27):13306-13308.
[22]	佟海英,吴文龙,闾连飞,等. 薄壳山核桃优良品种及其栽培技术要点[J]. 林业科技开发,2005,19 (6):47-49.
[23]	张雨,董润泉,习学良,等. 云南美国山核桃引种栽培试验[J]. 西南农业学报,2004(Z1):467-470.
[24]	王曼,李贤忠,宁德鲁,等. 薄壳山核桃研究概况及发展趋势[J]. 林业调查规划,2009,34(6):93-95.
[25]	熊新武,习学良,范志远,等. 3个美国山核桃优良品种生物学特性调查[J]. 西部林业科学,2006,35(3):81-86.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(2904) PDF downloads(1204) Cited by()

Proportional views

Observation and Comparison of Flowering Phenology of Different Carya illinoensis Clones

1. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang 311400, Zhejiang, China

2. Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, China

Received Date: 2014-05-29

Abstract: Flowering phenology of thirty-two Carya illinoensis clones was observed and compared. The results showed that there exited some differences in flowering phonological phase from 2011 to 2014 and the duration of blossom process of all the thirty-two clones was from April 24 to May 21 in 2013. The lasting days of male flower of the thirty-two clones were 11-18 days and the whole flowering period of female flower were 9-17 days in 2013. The duration of receptivity stage of female flower and pollen shedding stage of male flower of thirty-two clones were all 3-8 days. According to the time order of blossom of male and female flowers, sixteen clones could be determined as protogynous type, ten clones were protandrous type and six clones the homogamic type. Eighty-six feasible pollination combinations could be selected according to the observation results. The best configuration scheme of clones was proposed. No significant difference was found in the length of male inflorescence among the thirty-two clones, but the differences among the clusters of male flower in a single branch, the number of pollen sac in a single male inflorescence, the total number of male inflorescence per plant, numbers of female flower per branch, numbers of male inflorescence per cluster and numbers of female flower per plant reached a significant level. The range of whole variation in the total number of male inflorescence per plant was the biggest, the coefficient of variation was 75.51%.

HTML

Reference (25)

[1]	胡芳名,谭晓风,刘惠民,等. 中国主要经济树种栽培与利用[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006: 66-71.
[2]	姚小华,王开良,任华东,等. 薄壳山核桃优新品种和无性系开花物候特性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2004,26(5): 675-680.
[3]	张日清,吕芳德. 优良经济树种——美国山核桃[J]. 广西林业科学,1998,27(4): 202-206.
[4]	张日清,吕芳德. 美国山核桃在原产地分布、引种栽培区划及主要栽培品种分类研究概述[J]. 经济林研究, 2002,20(3): 53-55.
[5]	吴国良,陈丽霞,段良骅,等. 美国山核桃[J]. 山西果树, 2005,1(1):35-36.
[6]	侯冬培,习学良,石卓功. 我国薄壳山核桃研究概况[J]. 山东林业科技, 2007(4): 53-55.
[7]	贾晓东,王涛,张计育,等. 美国山核桃研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2012,28(4):74-78.
[8]	Polito V S,Pinney K. The relationship between phenology of pistillate flower organogenesis and mode of heterodichogamy in Juglans regia L. (Juglandaceae) [J]. Sexual Plant Reprod,1997,10(1):36-39.
[9]	Ares A, Reid W,Brauer D. Production and economics of native pecan silvopastures in central United States[J]. Agroforestry Systems,2006,66(3):205-215.
[10]	李俊南,李莲芳,熊新武,等. 薄壳山核桃无性繁殖技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(33): 16226-16228.
[11]	夏根清,翁春余,王开良, 等. 薄壳山核桃嫁接技术试验[J]. 经济林研究,2007,25(4): 109-112.
[12]	常君,姚小华,杨水平,等. 美国山核桃不同品种接穗对嫁接苗木根系生长发育影响的研究[J]. 西南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 29(10): 104-108.
[13]	常君,姚小华,王开良,等. 不同无性系美国山核桃种子对其苗木根系生长影响的研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 34(1): 109-114.
[14]	杨建华,习学良,范志远,等. 不同美国山核桃品种的发芽及开花习性研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2008,37(1): 87-90.
[15]	李川,姚小华,王开良,等. 12个薄壳山核桃无性系果(核)性状以及产量的比较[J] . 西南大学学报: 自然科学版,2011,33( 6) : 40-44.
[16]	莫正海,张计育,翟敏,等. 薄壳山核桃在南京的开花物候期观察和比较[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2013, 22 (1):57-62.
[17]	姚小华. 山核桃高效栽培技术[M]. 北京: 金盾出版社,2012.
[18]	常君,李川,王开良,等. 薄壳山核桃无性系开花物候特性观测[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2012,34(4): 730-735.
[19]	李雪,徐迎春,李永荣,等. 薄壳山核桃不同品系开花物候期特性观测[J]. 江苏林业科技,2012,37(6): 19-21.
[20]	房瑶瑶,陈兴彬,杨克强,等. 核桃实生群体物候的观测[J]. 经济林研究,2011,(3):98-101.
[21]	李永荣,吴文龙,刘永芝. 薄壳山核桃种质资源的开发利用[J]. 安徽农业科学,2009,37(27):13306-13308.
[22]	佟海英,吴文龙,闾连飞,等. 薄壳山核桃优良品种及其栽培技术要点[J]. 林业科技开发,2005,19 (6):47-49.
[23]	张雨,董润泉,习学良,等. 云南美国山核桃引种栽培试验[J]. 西南农业学报,2004(Z1):467-470.
[24]	王曼,李贤忠,宁德鲁,等. 薄壳山核桃研究概况及发展趋势[J]. 林业调查规划,2009,34(6):93-95.
[25]	熊新武,习学良,范志远,等. 3个美国山核桃优良品种生物学特性调查[J]. 西部林业科学,2006,35(3):81-86.

Observation and Comparison of Flowering Phenology of Different Carya illinoensis Clones

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Observation and Comparison of Flowering Phenology of Different Carya illinoensis Clones

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content