• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Comparative Study on Quality and Palatability of Rhizome Shoot of Phyllostachys prominens and Phyllostachys edulis

  • Received Date: 2014-09-28
  • Phyllostachys prominens with high potential of rhizome shoot production and strong elongation growth of rhizome is an excellent bamboo species used both for shoot and timber. The appearance quality, the contents of nutrient substances, flavour substances and amino acid in rhizome shoot of Ph. prominens were compared with the rhizome shoot of Ph. edulis to access the quality and palatability. The results are as follows. 1. The length of Ph. prominens rhizome shoot was slightly longer; 2. The individual weight, shoot diameter and contents of protein, tannin, oxalic acid, total acid, cellulose, lignin of Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were significantly lower than that of the Ph. edulis; 3. The edible rate, ratio of sugar to acid, contents of soluble sugar and fat of Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were obviously higher; 4. The content of total amino acid and its components except delicious amino acid in Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were dramatically lower, while the proportion of delicious, sweet and aromatic amino acid in Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were markedly higher than that of Ph. edulis; 5. The bitter amino acid proportion in Ph. prominens rhizome shoot was significantly lower than that of Ph. edulis. All the results indicated that there were significantly differences on rhizome shoot quality and palatability between Ph. prominens and Ph. edulis. The rhizome shoot of Ph. prominens with high edible rate and low roughness was relatively larger and more palatable. Overall, the rhizome shoot quality of Ph. prominens was better than that of Ph. edulis.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 方伟, 杨德清, 马志华, 等. 高节竹笋用林培育技术及经济效益分析[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 1998, 17(3): 15-20.

    [2] 胡国良, 俞彩珠, 楼君芳, 等. 高节竹梢枯病发生规律及防治试验[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2005, 24(5): 38-41.

    [3] 张稼敏. 高节竹丛枝病研究初报[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2000, 20(5): 38, 53.

    [4] 余学军, 陈庆虎, 吴家森, 等. 保鲜处理对高节竹笋采后生理的影响[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2004, 23(1): 46-48, 58.

    [5] 白瑞华, 丁兴萃, 杜旭华, 等. 套袋栽培对高节竹笋品质的影响[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2011, 31(1): 64-67.

    [6] 中华人民共和国卫生部. GB/T 5009.6-2003 食品中脂肪的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.

    [7] 中华人民共和国卫生部. GB/T 5009.5-2010 食品中蛋白质的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.

    [8] 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1278-2007 蔬菜及其制品中可溶性糖的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.

    [9] 俞乐, 彭新湘, 杨崇, 等. 反相高效液相色谱法测定植物组织及根分泌物中草酸[J]. 分析化学, 2002, 30(9): 1119-1122.

    [10] 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1600-2008 水果、蔬菜及其制品中单宁含量的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.

    [11] 中华人民共和国卫生部. GB/T 12456-2008 食品中总酸的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.

    [12] 莫润宏, 汤富彬, 丁明, 等. 氨基酸分析仪法测定竹笋中游离氨基酸[J]. 化学通报, 2012, 75(12): 1126-1131.

    [13] 王玉万, 徐文玉. 木质纤维素固体基质发醉物中半纤维素、纤维素和木素的定量分析程序[J]. 微生物学通报, 1987, 5: 81-84.

    [14] 赵树田, 张士青. 草酸代谢酶的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报: 医学版, 2007, 27(10): 1274-1277.

    [15]

    Vander Wall S B. The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal[J]. The Botanical Review, 2001, 67(1): 74-117.
    [16] 宁正祥, 赵谋明, 邝荣泽. 新鲜果蔬保健作用的探讨[J]. 营养学报, 1992, 14( 3): 260-265.

    [17] 王海霞, 彭九生, 曾庆南, 等. 江西毛竹笋营养品质区域分异性研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2012, 31(4): 22-25.

    [18] 朱元洪. 施肥和土壤养分对毛竹笋营养成分的影响[J] . 土壤学报, 1992, 28(1): 40-48.

    [19] 李伟成, 王树东, 钟哲科, 等. 覆膜对酒竹笋营养元素与成分的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(4): 732-735.

    [20] 刘耀荣. 毛竹笋期的营养动态[J]. 林业科学研究, 1990, 3(4): 363-367.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(2792) PDF downloads(1103) Cited by()

Proportional views

Comparative Study on Quality and Palatability of Rhizome Shoot of Phyllostachys prominens and Phyllostachys edulis

  • 1. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China
  • 2. Forestry Technology Extension Central Station of Tonglu County, Tonglu 311500, Zhejiang, China

Abstract: Phyllostachys prominens with high potential of rhizome shoot production and strong elongation growth of rhizome is an excellent bamboo species used both for shoot and timber. The appearance quality, the contents of nutrient substances, flavour substances and amino acid in rhizome shoot of Ph. prominens were compared with the rhizome shoot of Ph. edulis to access the quality and palatability. The results are as follows. 1. The length of Ph. prominens rhizome shoot was slightly longer; 2. The individual weight, shoot diameter and contents of protein, tannin, oxalic acid, total acid, cellulose, lignin of Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were significantly lower than that of the Ph. edulis; 3. The edible rate, ratio of sugar to acid, contents of soluble sugar and fat of Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were obviously higher; 4. The content of total amino acid and its components except delicious amino acid in Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were dramatically lower, while the proportion of delicious, sweet and aromatic amino acid in Ph. prominens rhizome shoot were markedly higher than that of Ph. edulis; 5. The bitter amino acid proportion in Ph. prominens rhizome shoot was significantly lower than that of Ph. edulis. All the results indicated that there were significantly differences on rhizome shoot quality and palatability between Ph. prominens and Ph. edulis. The rhizome shoot of Ph. prominens with high edible rate and low roughness was relatively larger and more palatable. Overall, the rhizome shoot quality of Ph. prominens was better than that of Ph. edulis.

Reference (20)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return