GCA/SCA of Oleoresin Compounds for F3 Hybrid Progeny of Pinus massoniana Younglings

DONG Hong-yu; LIU Qing-hua; ZHOU Zhi-chun; JIN Guo-qing; SHEN Dan-yu; SONG Xin-hui

Volume 29 Issue 5

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2016 > 29(5): 654-661

Citation:

GCA/SCA of Oleoresin Compounds for F3 Hybrid Progeny of Pinus massoniana Younglings

1.
Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Engineering Research Center of Masson Pine of State Forestry Administration, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China
2.
Laoshan Forest Farm of Chun'an Country, Zhejiang Province, Chun'an 311700, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2016-03-04

Abstract

[Objective] To study genetic effects of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) of oleoresin components of Pinus massoniana for the purpose of genetic improvement of oleoresin-producing P. massoniana. [Method] A half diallel cross among 6 P. massoniana clones in Laoshan Forest Farm of Zhejiang Province was used to reveal the genetic variation of oleoresin components, the correlation between growth and the content of oleoresin components and the correlation between oleoresin compounds by investigating the growth and the content of oleoresin components of each sample. [Result] Twenty three oleoresin components were identified, the Monoterpenes, Sesquiterpenes and Diterpenes accounted for 7.29%, 1.50% and 91.17% of total oleoresin content. It was found that the genetic effects of GCA were more significant than the genetic effects of SCA in the 13 major oleoresin components with higher average content and significant differences among the combinations. Most major oleoresin components were controlled mainly by the additive gene effects while dehydroabietic acid was controlled mainly the by dominance gene effects and levopimaric acid/palustric acid, 8,12-Abietadienoic acid were controlled by the additive gene effects and the dominance gene effects simultaneously. The 13 major oleoresin components were under moderate or high level genetic control with the full-sib 0.655~0.949. In addition, higher positive correlations were found between α-pinene, camphene and β-pinene in monoterpenes, which means the selection of one component can make the same increase or decrease for the other components. However,levopimaric acid/palustric acid in diterpenes were found higher negative correlations with most major oleoresin components of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and diterpenes components, and the extremely significant negative correlations were found between levopimaric acid/palustric acid and longifolene, pimaric acid, dehydroabietic acid, 8,12-abietadienoic acid, abietic acid, neoabietic acid, which mean the selection of levopimaric acid/palustric acid will restrain the increase of most major oleoresin components. Meanwhile, it was found that most major oleoresin components and growth traits were hardly relevant. So it is speculated that the two types of traits may be independent and controlled by different genetic mechanism. [Conclusion] Most of oleoresin components had significant GCA effect and were controlled mainly by the additive gene effects. These oleoresin compounds had moderate to strong family heritability. The correlation was not significant between growth and the content of oleoresin compounds, but there were significant among oleoresin compounds, which can be used to determine the optimize improvement strategy for oleoresin trait in P. massoniana.
- Pinus massoniana,
- oleoresin components,
- GCA,
- SCA,
- correlation

References

[1]	Lee H J, Ravn M M, Coates R M. Synthesis and characterization of abietadiene, levopimaradiene, and neoabietadiene:hydrocarbon precuisors of the abietane diterpene resin acids[J]. Tetrahedron,2001,57(29):6155-6177.
[2]	Manninen A M, Utriainen J, Holopainen T, et al. Comparing the variation of needle and wood terpenoids in Scots pine provenances[J].Can J For Res, 2002, 28(1):211-228.
[3]	Lieutier F, Day K R, Battwasti A, et al. Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe[J]. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004:135-176,135-176.
[4]	Tisdale R A, Nebeker T E, Hodger J D. The role of oleoresin flow in the induced response of loblolly pine to a southern pine beetle associated fungus[J]. Can J Bot, 2003,81(4):368-374.
[5]	Roberds R H, Storm B L, Hain F P, et al. Estimates of genetic parameters for oleoresin and growth traits in juvenile loblolly pine[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2003,33(12):2496-2476.
[6]	Strom B L, Goyer R A, Ingram Jr. L L, et al. Oleoresin charecteristics of progeny of lobolly pines that escaped attack by the southern pine beetle[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2002, 158(1-3):169-178.
[7]	贾洪敏, 黄大庄, 曹逸霞, 等. 松脂单萜类物质与油松对红脂大小蠹抗性的关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2008,36(1):48-50.
[8]	赵振东, 李冬梅, 胡樨萼, 等. 抗松材线虫病马尾松种源化学成分与抗性机理研究(第Ⅱ报)[J]. 林产化学与工业,2001,21(1):56-60.
[9]	李彦杰, 姜景民, 栾启福. 湿地松家系产脂力、树脂密度和松节油含量的测定与遗传分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2012,34(4):48-51.
[10]	刘青华, 金国庆, 王晖, 等. 马尾松巢式交配子代产脂力、生长和木材密度遗传分析[J].林业科学研究, 2014,27(6):715-720.
[11]	张谦, 曾令海, 何波祥, 等. 马尾松自由授粉家系产脂力的年度变化及遗传分析[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(1):48-52.
[12]	古研, 赵振东, 毕良武, 等. 马尾松松节油标准样品的定值研究[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2011, 45(1):21-24.
[13]	王振洪, 商士斌, 宋湛谦, 等. 气相色谱用马尾松松香标准样品的研制[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2007, 41(6):1-5.
[14]	岳水林, 荣文琛. 马尾松种源松脂组分的地理变异[J]. 林业科学研究, 1994,7(4):431-435.
[15]	尹晓兵, 耿树香, 马惠芬,等. 思茅松松脂松节油群体的物理及化学特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2005,29(5):80-84.
[16]	李彦杰, 栾启福, 沈丹玉, 等. 湿地松自由授粉家系松脂组分遗传变异研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2012,25(6):773-779.
[17]	庄伟瑛, 张玉英, 范国荣, 等. 湿地松松脂中单萜类组分研究初报[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2008, 30(3):480-498.
[18]	庄伟瑛, 欧阳道明, 范国荣, 等. 湿地松松脂中单萜类组分研究续报[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2009, 31(3):388-392.
[19]	金国庆, 秦国峰, 刘伟宏, 等. 马尾松生长性状交配效应的遗传分析及杂交组合选择[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(6):28-33.
[20]	续九如. 林木数量遗传学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006.
[21]	孔繁玲. 植物数量遗传学[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2006.
[22]	李力, 施季森, 曹汉洋, 等. 杉木两水平双列杂交亲本配合力分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2000, 24(5):9-13.
[23]	Jantan I, Ahmad A S,Ahmad I A. Oleoresins of three Pinus species from Malaysian pine plantations[J]. Journal of Essentoal Oil Research,2002, 14(5), 327-332.
[24]	Rezzi S, Bighelli A, Castola V, et al. Composition and chemical variability of the oleoresin of Pinus nigra ssp. laricio from Corsica[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2005,21(1):71-79.
[25]	Sprague G F, Tatum L A. General and specific combining ability in single crosses of corn[J]. Journal of American Society of Agronomy, 1942, 34(4):923-932.
[26]	周志春, 金国庆, 秦国锋, 等. 马尾松纸浆材重要经济性状配合力及杂种优势分析[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(4):52-57.
[27]	Karanikas C, Walker V, Scaltsoyiannes A, et al. High vs. low yielding oleoresin Pinus halepensis Mill. trees GC terpenoids profiling as diagnostic tool[J]. Ann For Sci, 2010, 67(4):412P1-412P8.
[28]	张培杲, 吴贯明. 森林遗传学试验新技术[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1981.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(2738) PDF downloads(704) Cited by()

Proportional views

GCA/SCA of Oleoresin Compounds for F3 Hybrid Progeny of Pinus massoniana Younglings

1. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Engineering Research Center of Masson Pine of State Forestry Administration, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China

2. Laoshan Forest Farm of Chun'an Country, Zhejiang Province, Chun'an 311700, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2016-03-04

Abstract: [Objective] To study genetic effects of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) of oleoresin components of Pinus massoniana for the purpose of genetic improvement of oleoresin-producing P. massoniana. [Method] A half diallel cross among 6 P. massoniana clones in Laoshan Forest Farm of Zhejiang Province was used to reveal the genetic variation of oleoresin components, the correlation between growth and the content of oleoresin components and the correlation between oleoresin compounds by investigating the growth and the content of oleoresin components of each sample. [Result] Twenty three oleoresin components were identified, the Monoterpenes, Sesquiterpenes and Diterpenes accounted for 7.29%, 1.50% and 91.17% of total oleoresin content. It was found that the genetic effects of GCA were more significant than the genetic effects of SCA in the 13 major oleoresin components with higher average content and significant differences among the combinations. Most major oleoresin components were controlled mainly by the additive gene effects while dehydroabietic acid was controlled mainly the by dominance gene effects and levopimaric acid/palustric acid, 8,12-Abietadienoic acid were controlled by the additive gene effects and the dominance gene effects simultaneously. The 13 major oleoresin components were under moderate or high level genetic control with the full-sib 0.655~0.949. In addition, higher positive correlations were found between α-pinene, camphene and β-pinene in monoterpenes, which means the selection of one component can make the same increase or decrease for the other components. However,levopimaric acid/palustric acid in diterpenes were found higher negative correlations with most major oleoresin components of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and diterpenes components, and the extremely significant negative correlations were found between levopimaric acid/palustric acid and longifolene, pimaric acid, dehydroabietic acid, 8,12-abietadienoic acid, abietic acid, neoabietic acid, which mean the selection of levopimaric acid/palustric acid will restrain the increase of most major oleoresin components. Meanwhile, it was found that most major oleoresin components and growth traits were hardly relevant. So it is speculated that the two types of traits may be independent and controlled by different genetic mechanism. [Conclusion] Most of oleoresin components had significant GCA effect and were controlled mainly by the additive gene effects. These oleoresin compounds had moderate to strong family heritability. The correlation was not significant between growth and the content of oleoresin compounds, but there were significant among oleoresin compounds, which can be used to determine the optimize improvement strategy for oleoresin trait in P. massoniana.

HTML

Reference (28)

[1]	Lee H J, Ravn M M, Coates R M. Synthesis and characterization of abietadiene, levopimaradiene, and neoabietadiene:hydrocarbon precuisors of the abietane diterpene resin acids[J]. Tetrahedron,2001,57(29):6155-6177.
[2]	Manninen A M, Utriainen J, Holopainen T, et al. Comparing the variation of needle and wood terpenoids in Scots pine provenances[J].Can J For Res, 2002, 28(1):211-228.
[3]	Lieutier F, Day K R, Battwasti A, et al. Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe[J]. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004:135-176,135-176.
[4]	Tisdale R A, Nebeker T E, Hodger J D. The role of oleoresin flow in the induced response of loblolly pine to a southern pine beetle associated fungus[J]. Can J Bot, 2003,81(4):368-374.
[5]	Roberds R H, Storm B L, Hain F P, et al. Estimates of genetic parameters for oleoresin and growth traits in juvenile loblolly pine[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2003,33(12):2496-2476.
[6]	Strom B L, Goyer R A, Ingram Jr. L L, et al. Oleoresin charecteristics of progeny of lobolly pines that escaped attack by the southern pine beetle[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2002, 158(1-3):169-178.
[7]	贾洪敏, 黄大庄, 曹逸霞, 等. 松脂单萜类物质与油松对红脂大小蠹抗性的关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2008,36(1):48-50.
[8]	赵振东, 李冬梅, 胡樨萼, 等. 抗松材线虫病马尾松种源化学成分与抗性机理研究(第Ⅱ报)[J]. 林产化学与工业,2001,21(1):56-60.
[9]	李彦杰, 姜景民, 栾启福. 湿地松家系产脂力、树脂密度和松节油含量的测定与遗传分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2012,34(4):48-51.
[10]	刘青华, 金国庆, 王晖, 等. 马尾松巢式交配子代产脂力、生长和木材密度遗传分析[J].林业科学研究, 2014,27(6):715-720.
[11]	张谦, 曾令海, 何波祥, 等. 马尾松自由授粉家系产脂力的年度变化及遗传分析[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(1):48-52.
[12]	古研, 赵振东, 毕良武, 等. 马尾松松节油标准样品的定值研究[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2011, 45(1):21-24.
[13]	王振洪, 商士斌, 宋湛谦, 等. 气相色谱用马尾松松香标准样品的研制[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2007, 41(6):1-5.
[14]	岳水林, 荣文琛. 马尾松种源松脂组分的地理变异[J]. 林业科学研究, 1994,7(4):431-435.
[15]	尹晓兵, 耿树香, 马惠芬,等. 思茅松松脂松节油群体的物理及化学特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2005,29(5):80-84.
[16]	李彦杰, 栾启福, 沈丹玉, 等. 湿地松自由授粉家系松脂组分遗传变异研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2012,25(6):773-779.
[17]	庄伟瑛, 张玉英, 范国荣, 等. 湿地松松脂中单萜类组分研究初报[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2008, 30(3):480-498.
[18]	庄伟瑛, 欧阳道明, 范国荣, 等. 湿地松松脂中单萜类组分研究续报[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2009, 31(3):388-392.
[19]	金国庆, 秦国峰, 刘伟宏, 等. 马尾松生长性状交配效应的遗传分析及杂交组合选择[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(6):28-33.
[20]	续九如. 林木数量遗传学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006.
[21]	孔繁玲. 植物数量遗传学[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2006.
[22]	李力, 施季森, 曹汉洋, 等. 杉木两水平双列杂交亲本配合力分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2000, 24(5):9-13.
[23]	Jantan I, Ahmad A S,Ahmad I A. Oleoresins of three Pinus species from Malaysian pine plantations[J]. Journal of Essentoal Oil Research,2002, 14(5), 327-332.
[24]	Rezzi S, Bighelli A, Castola V, et al. Composition and chemical variability of the oleoresin of Pinus nigra ssp. laricio from Corsica[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2005,21(1):71-79.
[25]	Sprague G F, Tatum L A. General and specific combining ability in single crosses of corn[J]. Journal of American Society of Agronomy, 1942, 34(4):923-932.
[26]	周志春, 金国庆, 秦国锋, 等. 马尾松纸浆材重要经济性状配合力及杂种优势分析[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(4):52-57.
[27]	Karanikas C, Walker V, Scaltsoyiannes A, et al. High vs. low yielding oleoresin Pinus halepensis Mill. trees GC terpenoids profiling as diagnostic tool[J]. Ann For Sci, 2010, 67(4):412P1-412P8.
[28]	张培杲, 吴贯明. 森林遗传学试验新技术[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1981.

GCA/SCA of Oleoresin Compounds for F3 Hybrid Progeny of Pinus massoniana Younglings

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

GCA/SCA of Oleoresin Compounds for F3 Hybrid Progeny of Pinus massoniana Younglings

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content