Studies on Soil Microorganism Quantity and Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus varaibilis Plantations in North China

WANG Feng-qin; TIAN Li-qing; SANG Yu-qiang; SONG An-dong; ZHANG Jin-song

Volume 29 Issue 6

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2016 > 29(6): 956-961

Citation:

Studies on Soil Microorganism Quantity and Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus varaibilis Plantations in North China

1.
College of Life Science, He'nan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Enzyme Engineering of Agricultural Microbiology, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhengzhou 450002, He'nan, China
2.
College of Forestry, Agricultural University of He'nan, Zhengzhou 450002, He'nan, China
3.
Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

Received Date: 2014-03-21

Abstract

[Objective] In order to provide the theoretical basis for evaluating the effect on soil microbial properties and for establishing reasonable sustainable forest management to reduce soil erosion and land degradation, soil chemical properties and microbial biomass of main tree species-Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus varaibilis in rocky mountain area of northern China were studied. [Methods] The chemical properties, microorganism amount, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in soil of R. pseudoacacia and Q. varaibilis plantations were analyzed. The factors influencing soil fertility were also studied with principal component analysis and stepwise regression analysis. [Results] The results showed that three kinds of main soil microorganisms and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen decreased with the deepening of the soil depth. The amount of soil bacteria in the R. pseudoacacia plantation was 2.13-2.26 times that in the soil of Q. varaibilis plantation. While the amount of actinomycetes in the soil of Q. variabilis plantation was 4.48-6.05 times that in the soil of R. pseudoacacia plantation. No obvious difference was observed between the amounts of fungi in these two kinds of forest soil. The content of nitrate nitrogen, organic matter, available phosphorus and the total amount of microbes, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in the soil humus layer of R. pseudoacacia plantation were significantly higher than that of Q. variabilis plantation. [Conclusion] (1) The soil physical and chemical properties and the number of microorganisms and microbial biomass carbon/nitrogen could be used to reflect the variability of soil fertility in this area. (2) The main factors affecting the total amount of microbes and microbial biomass carbon/nitrogen are total nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium. (3) Planting R. pseudoacacia is more conducive to the ecological restoration of soils than planting Q. varaibilis.
- Robinia pseudoacacia,
- Quercus variabilis,
- soil microbes,
- microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen,
- stepwise regression analysis

References

[1]	邹军, 张明礼, 杨浩. 退耕还林(草)与水土保持若干问题的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(2): 506-512.
[2]	胡婵娟, 郭雷. 植被恢复的生态效应研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(9): 1640-1646.
[3]	Zhang B, Yang Y, Zepp H. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil and water erosion and nutrient losses of a severely eroded clayey Plinthudult in southeastern China[J]. Catena, 2004, 57: 77-90.
[4]	Zhang F L. Effect of vegetation changes on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau[J]. Pedosphere, 2006, 16: 420-427.
[5]	刘满强, 胡锋, 何园球, 等. 退化红壤不同植被恢复模式下土壤微生物量季节动态及其指示意义[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(6): 937-943.
[6]	Bossio D A, Scow K M. Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61(11): 4043-4050.
[7]	Rogers B F, Tate R L. Temporal analysis of the soil microbial community along a topo sequence in pineland soils [J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001, 33(10): 1389-1401.
[8]	胡海波, 张金池, 高智慧. 岩质海岸防护林土壤微生物数量及其与酶活性和化学性质的关系[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 15(1): 88-95.
[9]	Aciego Pietri J C, Brookes P C. Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2009, 41(7): 1396-1405.
[10]	Nobili M D, Contin M, Mondini C,et al. Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001, 33(9), 1163-1170.
[11]	于树, 汪景宽术, 高艳梅, 等. 地膜覆盖及不同施肥处理对土壤微生物量碳和氮的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37(4): 602-606.
[12]	单鸿宾, 梁智, 王纯利, 等. 连作及灌溉方式对棉田土壤微生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(4): 202-205.
[13]	Moore J M, Klose S, Tabatabai M A. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 2000, 31: 200-210.
[14]	Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Spiegel H. Long-term monitoring of microbial biomass, N mineralisation and enzyme activities of a Chernozem under different tillage management[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 28(4): 343-351.
[15]	闫浩, 赵彤, 蒋跃利, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18): 1-8.
[16]	蔡志坚, 蒋瞻, 杨加猛, 等. 环境治理视角下石漠化片区的农业发展[J]. 江淮论坛, 2014(2): 18-28.
[17]	韩克松. 退耕还林对农户可持续生计的影响探讨[J]. 绿色科技, 2014(2): 131-132.
[18]	中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室. 土壤微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985.
[19]	李振高, 骆永明, 滕应. 土壤与环境微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
[20]	全国农业技术推广服务中心. 土壤分析技术规范(第二版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[21]	李亮. 乌兰布和沙漠东北部沙区农田和林地土壤微生物及酶活性研究. 杨陵:西北农林科技大学, 2010.
[22]	薛立, 赖日石, 陈红跃, 等. 深圳宝安区生态风景林典型造林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(2): 242-246.
[23]	张笑培, 杨改河, 王得祥, 等. 黄土高原沟壑区不同植被恢复模式对土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 36(5): 149-159.
[24]	薛楚, 刘国彬, 藏全厚, 等. 侵蚀环境生态恢复过程中人工刺槐林(Robinia pseudoacacia)土壤微生物量演变特征[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(3): 909-917.
[25]	刘栋, 黄懿梅, 安韶山. 黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林恢复过程中土壤氮素与微生物活性的变化[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(3): 322-329.
[26]	Wardle D A. Controls of temporal variability of the soil microbial biomass: a global-scale synthesis[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1998, 30(13): 1627-1637.
[27]	Cleveland C C, Liptzin D. C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: is there a Redfield ratio" for the microbial biomass[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85(3): 235-252.
[28]	赵彤, 闫浩, 蒋跃利, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18): 5615-5622.
[29]	李娟, 赵秉强, 李秀英, 等. 长期有机无机肥料配施对土壤微生物学特性及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1): 144-152.
[30]	Parffit R L, Yeates G W, Ross D J, et al. Relationships between soil biota, nitrogen and phosphorus availability, and pasture growth under organic and conventional management[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2005, 28(1): 1-13.
[31]	孙儒泳, 李博, 诸葛阳, 等. 普通生态学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1993: 132-135.
[32]	邵泽坦. 刺槐栓皮栎混交林调查报告[J]. 山东林业科技, 1992, 84(3): 33-35.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(2657) PDF downloads(714) Cited by()

Proportional views

Studies on Soil Microorganism Quantity and Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus varaibilis Plantations in North China

1. College of Life Science, He'nan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Enzyme Engineering of Agricultural Microbiology, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhengzhou 450002, He'nan, China

2. College of Forestry, Agricultural University of He'nan, Zhengzhou 450002, He'nan, China

3. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

Received Date: 2014-03-21

Abstract: [Objective] In order to provide the theoretical basis for evaluating the effect on soil microbial properties and for establishing reasonable sustainable forest management to reduce soil erosion and land degradation, soil chemical properties and microbial biomass of main tree species-Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus varaibilis in rocky mountain area of northern China were studied. [Methods] The chemical properties, microorganism amount, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in soil of R. pseudoacacia and Q. varaibilis plantations were analyzed. The factors influencing soil fertility were also studied with principal component analysis and stepwise regression analysis. [Results] The results showed that three kinds of main soil microorganisms and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen decreased with the deepening of the soil depth. The amount of soil bacteria in the R. pseudoacacia plantation was 2.13-2.26 times that in the soil of Q. varaibilis plantation. While the amount of actinomycetes in the soil of Q. variabilis plantation was 4.48-6.05 times that in the soil of R. pseudoacacia plantation. No obvious difference was observed between the amounts of fungi in these two kinds of forest soil. The content of nitrate nitrogen, organic matter, available phosphorus and the total amount of microbes, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in the soil humus layer of R. pseudoacacia plantation were significantly higher than that of Q. variabilis plantation. [Conclusion] (1) The soil physical and chemical properties and the number of microorganisms and microbial biomass carbon/nitrogen could be used to reflect the variability of soil fertility in this area. (2) The main factors affecting the total amount of microbes and microbial biomass carbon/nitrogen are total nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium. (3) Planting R. pseudoacacia is more conducive to the ecological restoration of soils than planting Q. varaibilis.

HTML

Reference (32)

[1]	邹军, 张明礼, 杨浩. 退耕还林(草)与水土保持若干问题的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(2): 506-512.
[2]	胡婵娟, 郭雷. 植被恢复的生态效应研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(9): 1640-1646.
[3]	Zhang B, Yang Y, Zepp H. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil and water erosion and nutrient losses of a severely eroded clayey Plinthudult in southeastern China[J]. Catena, 2004, 57: 77-90.
[4]	Zhang F L. Effect of vegetation changes on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau[J]. Pedosphere, 2006, 16: 420-427.
[5]	刘满强, 胡锋, 何园球, 等. 退化红壤不同植被恢复模式下土壤微生物量季节动态及其指示意义[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(6): 937-943.
[6]	Bossio D A, Scow K M. Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61(11): 4043-4050.
[7]	Rogers B F, Tate R L. Temporal analysis of the soil microbial community along a topo sequence in pineland soils [J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001, 33(10): 1389-1401.
[8]	胡海波, 张金池, 高智慧. 岩质海岸防护林土壤微生物数量及其与酶活性和化学性质的关系[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 15(1): 88-95.
[9]	Aciego Pietri J C, Brookes P C. Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2009, 41(7): 1396-1405.
[10]	Nobili M D, Contin M, Mondini C,et al. Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001, 33(9), 1163-1170.
[11]	于树, 汪景宽术, 高艳梅, 等. 地膜覆盖及不同施肥处理对土壤微生物量碳和氮的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37(4): 602-606.
[12]	单鸿宾, 梁智, 王纯利, 等. 连作及灌溉方式对棉田土壤微生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(4): 202-205.
[13]	Moore J M, Klose S, Tabatabai M A. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 2000, 31: 200-210.
[14]	Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Spiegel H. Long-term monitoring of microbial biomass, N mineralisation and enzyme activities of a Chernozem under different tillage management[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 28(4): 343-351.
[15]	闫浩, 赵彤, 蒋跃利, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18): 1-8.
[16]	蔡志坚, 蒋瞻, 杨加猛, 等. 环境治理视角下石漠化片区的农业发展[J]. 江淮论坛, 2014(2): 18-28.
[17]	韩克松. 退耕还林对农户可持续生计的影响探讨[J]. 绿色科技, 2014(2): 131-132.
[18]	中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室. 土壤微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985.
[19]	李振高, 骆永明, 滕应. 土壤与环境微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
[20]	全国农业技术推广服务中心. 土壤分析技术规范(第二版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[21]	李亮. 乌兰布和沙漠东北部沙区农田和林地土壤微生物及酶活性研究. 杨陵:西北农林科技大学, 2010.
[22]	薛立, 赖日石, 陈红跃, 等. 深圳宝安区生态风景林典型造林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(2): 242-246.
[23]	张笑培, 杨改河, 王得祥, 等. 黄土高原沟壑区不同植被恢复模式对土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 36(5): 149-159.
[24]	薛楚, 刘国彬, 藏全厚, 等. 侵蚀环境生态恢复过程中人工刺槐林(Robinia pseudoacacia)土壤微生物量演变特征[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(3): 909-917.
[25]	刘栋, 黄懿梅, 安韶山. 黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林恢复过程中土壤氮素与微生物活性的变化[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(3): 322-329.
[26]	Wardle D A. Controls of temporal variability of the soil microbial biomass: a global-scale synthesis[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1998, 30(13): 1627-1637.
[27]	Cleveland C C, Liptzin D. C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: is there a Redfield ratio" for the microbial biomass[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85(3): 235-252.
[28]	赵彤, 闫浩, 蒋跃利, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18): 5615-5622.
[29]	李娟, 赵秉强, 李秀英, 等. 长期有机无机肥料配施对土壤微生物学特性及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1): 144-152.
[30]	Parffit R L, Yeates G W, Ross D J, et al. Relationships between soil biota, nitrogen and phosphorus availability, and pasture growth under organic and conventional management[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2005, 28(1): 1-13.
[31]	孙儒泳, 李博, 诸葛阳, 等. 普通生态学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1993: 132-135.
[32]	邵泽坦. 刺槐栓皮栎混交林调查报告[J]. 山东林业科技, 1992, 84(3): 33-35.

Studies on Soil Microorganism Quantity and Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus varaibilis Plantations in North China

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Studies on Soil Microorganism Quantity and Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus varaibilis Plantations in North China

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content